The first question is on the overall biosimilar landscape in the U.S. We see recent developments, which are all aimed at improving affordability and accessibility, which is good, structurally positive for us as well. But at the same time, it is also going t o make market more competitive. So, how should we think about what will be those key factors which will determine our success? You mentioned about having that cost advantage, but I'm assuming a lot of Indian companies would have that. So that's number one. And the second is we also see PBMs having their own brands or bringing their own labels in the space. That adds to the competition, right? How do you think about that relationship?
And just a second question, which is a clarification on Mirabegron. If I think about USD 90 million of payment, is it more or less what we have earned so far on this product or much lower than what we'd have made? That's number one. Second, with the settlement until September '27, does it mean that we should not anticipate any generic players to come in this period, or they could come and settle with similar terms, that is paying royalty, etcetera, on the sales that they could do?