Thank you, Abhishek. Let me answer one by one. Starting with the deflation number, 3% to 5% that I shared is mostly based on the industry mix of services. And for the specific question on how it changes with respect to the model effectiveness, I think most of the enhancement in models are really driving more and more velocity and efficiency in the SDLC lifecycle. I think that piece could go through a little higher deflation based on the model outcomes. In rest of the areas, it is Agentic, it is human -in-the-loop, and even the latest model on Anthropic's Mythos, ability to run production environment fixes without human -in-the-loop is very limited. And this has been acknowledged even in their own release n otes. It depends on the service mix. For us, we called out 2% to 3% and I think that holds true even now. In terms of new services, I think that's a great question. We have obviously called out 5 key areas, which is Physical AI, AI Factory, Custom Silicon Engineering for Inferencing, AI -led Marketing Services, and IP and Platforms. Of course, IP and platforms are integral to a lot of service transformation. It has a very small component of IP embedded into it. AI Factory is where we are seeing tremendous traction. One of the large deals that we called out this quarter is a $100 million+ AI factory deal for design, implementation and support of a next-gen AI data center for a large Technology company. So, I think we are seeing good traction. We are already now into two major clients for this, and we hope to get to another three or four more in this coming year. Similarly, Semiconductor Engineering, we also announced a new deal this quarter on Physical AI, which is really some ASIC development work on advanced nodes, which is also the cutting -edge work, and these are the areas which we are doubling down and we see great traction. Coming to the guidance, what it takes in, I don't want to kind of say that geopolitics is driving this. I would want to be more specific. Of course, there has been some impact in March, which is what is reflected in our significantly lower revenue in Q4. A nd as I said, two large Telecom clients have cut down on the discretionary spent for this calendar year. I see that continuing till end of the year. A couple of SAP programs got discontinued. That will also have an impact. We are seeing some softness in Europe, and the US seems to be quite robust except for this specific client situation that I called out. For FY’27, we see a half a percent reduction due to two clients and their own business challenges. We continue to have a very high wallet share, but their own business pressures have reduced significant spend and that is what is driving the overall guidance.
Two Telecom clients and the two other clients are completely different. The two other clients where there is a half -a-percent decrease in FY'27 guidance, one is a large Manufacturing client, other one is a Retail client. So there is no overlap in these clients. Now, what gives us confidence? This is restricted. As I said, in the lower end of our guidance, we are baking in that the softness continues. That is what we have baked in at the lower end of our guidance. And I think, given it is a well -known fact that 2% to 3% deflation happens, I think barring this, getting to 2% to 5% is a reasonable growth in the given environment and in so much of uncertainty. I think it is good and this of course does not include any acquisitions and they will get closed sometime during the year and we will call it out separately.