Hi. Thank you for taking my question. Can I come back on the ECL? Perhaps an academic point, but why was LGD different in Stage 1 and Stage 2? I would have thought it would be the PD that would be different and not the LGD. And presumably, that means that like a future credit cycle might look different. If you had the last three years and the next three years, it might -- the trajectory might look different on the credit cost. And I know you said it jokingly, the 165-175 basis point credit loss guidance, but the analysts have occupational hazard of picking that up. Is that kind of more like a business outlook because things are looking better? Or is there something more tangible that you are seeing in the business?
Yes. I might have misunderstood you then before. And perhaps one last one on LRS since we didn't get a chance to question on that. What were the main deltas for you, both positive and negatives as you did your LRS and -- to the last year? On the LRS, what were the main delta, positives or negatives?