Thank you Vibhor for that question. Look, let me start by saying that, we've seen this macro duality for some time . The degree keeps shifting every few months and sometimes every few weeks. One thing to bear in mind is that the traditional business process services are not as linked to discretionary spend as the traditional IT services side; that's one part of it . A substantial part of the business therefore ends up being annuity and recurring, giving a greater visibility if you will. What I will say is that in some sense the recent developments and the pace of advancement on the AI side, if nothing else, has structurally expanded the addressable market for players such as ourselves. And one of the things I talked about is what we have been seeing over the last few months where we are perceived as a consulting partner who doesn't just advise but also implements, doesn't just implement but also runs, and doesn't just run but also transforms. That's the core of what "Intelligence that operates" represents, that we're able to do this in one single continuous motion. And I think when we're doing that, what it does is it expands the surface area of what is available for us in terms of the TAM itself, because we're getting called in for deals that maybe three years back, if we were perceived as a deep domain BPM player in regulated markets, today I think we're seeing a lot of opportunities that cut across different areas itself, and that expansion o f surface area is certainly something that I think clients appreciate because they want one single continuous motion towards underwriting the business outcomes. So I think that's one part of it. I think the second part of it is related to the opportunity to expand share and take share from competitors itself, and I certainly we're seeing opportunities out there where the ability to play on offense -- and that has been a consistent theme that we've been saying now for at least ever since I've been at Firstsource, that look, when you end up having technology and macro shifts, it creates a dichotomy in terms of how different players operate. And certainly challenger brands such as ourselves have the opportunity to play on offense and adapt sooner, and that in turn allows you to take share away from other players in the marketplace on the back of very specific value propositions targeted towards the industries in which we have domain depth etc. And I think that combination is certainly yielding results as well. And I think third is in certain, some of the markets in which we operate, the degree of insourced that might have existed in the past, people are probably willing to look at many more options and as long as you're willing to go to them with a compelling proposition and a creative commercial construct, I think those are certainly again allowing them to evaluate different opportunities and maybe give us a sizable part of the pie as well. So, I think it's a combination of all these three: the value proposition, the share shift that we can impact, and the expansion from potentially what might be an insourced portfolio to a larger share of the pie.
We certainly think, Vibhor, the opportunity exists and here's why . I mean, if you talk to folks in Silicon Valley, I think they will assume that everything can be automated overnight. And that's what sometimes paints the scenario that hey, what does this mean for the industry and you've seen this with data that's reported that the industry is continuing to hold its own, certainly for some players in the market in terms of growth and so on and so forth. But a lot of it is because when you get under the hood of client operations, particularly go to a large bank, go to a large telco, go to a large health plan and I'm just giving you three distinct sectors which are regulated in nature, data quality is not w here it needs to be. So you can't just go overnight and automate their operations or even have agentic operations run autonomously etc. So, there's a significant amount of scaffolding work that needs to happen to ensure that the operation is ready for prime time. The determination of which processes are legible for even an agentic operation requires work. The determination of what kind of sec urity guardrails need to be in place is an opportunity. The determination of where should the process overrides be with a human in the loop is an intentional exercise. All of these are the scaffolding that needs to be put in place to ensure that you can actually truly get to the end state itself. And our view is that that's creating, expanding surface area in terms of the places where we can play.