Hi, Amit. Thanks for the opportunity and appreciate the color you have shared on restructuring of lower margin business and agree with you on all the logic that you spoke about. But my question is, when the SWC acquisition was announced roughly three years back, most of the analysts and investors have expressed the same concern at that point in time. So, three years out, what has changed for us to sort of claim that it's a great strategic trade to going to the level of saying that a lot of these businesses may become obsolete and that's why we are now restructuring it?
Sure, sir. I appreciate that context. So, I agree with you that over 10 -15 year time frame technology changes and a lot of things which were very relevant then might not be consequential anymore. But given that this is fairly recent, it's a three-year-old acquisition, and most of us have expressed this concern when you have actua lly refuted all these concerns and given a comfort that this is very strategic for you. So, in that backdrop comes my question of what is the incremental discovery here that led to this rationalization? That is part number one. And part number two, I am following up on this question because I think Vibhor and Sandeep asked the same question in a different form. And from your response to them, I was not very clear whether this entire restructuring is happening entirely out of SWC or there are other parts to it also. So, based on these two aspects , I am repeating this question. My apologies if there is a misunderstanding on my end.