Thank you very much. We will now begin the question -and-answer session. First question is from the line of Abhishek Singhal from Naredi Investments Private Limited. Please proceed.
Anupam Rasayan India Limited analyst Q&A
Sir my first question, how many orders have we won since January to till date?
January of till date of this year right?
Yes.
Yes, so there has been no order finalization in this month January. But we hope a large portion of it to be finalized in probably next couple of weeks. So, we are working on as I said, right almost 900 crores kind of an inquiry pipeline. There were many exports, which were about to get finalized. But, because of the year end and the Western part open up quite late into the year. So, we expect those finalizations to happen anytime in February and March.
So, what kind of order book are you expecting at the end of the financial year FY24?
So, for the order book that we have on record so far we should be adding anywhere close to 100, 150 crores to that. And as I mentioned in my call, we are actually calibrating the order intake for FY26, as I am sure you understand that our delivery timelines for any order is average 11 to 12 months. And looking at our plan for next year and the pending order book on hand, we are calibrating it very cautiously, because for us on time delivery performance is of paramount importance. And that’s where I said that we are collaborating our order book for FY26 actually now. Sorry to intervene, we need to keep some buffer capacity for short term shutdown jobs which we always keep about 5% to 7% kind of capacity booked for that.
Okay. And what is the impact of the Red Sea crisis on revenue and margin?
So, practically no impact for us, because largely the orders that we executed most of them had indigenous item procurement. And our deliveries were mostly either ex-works or FOB. So, from that perspective, I can confidently say we had absolutely no impact on our revenues or margins.
So, on FOB basis buyer immediately book revenue and delay for booked ship?
So, most of our equipment’s which have gone have already passed, loaded, and moved out of the ship, and quarter four we h ave some of the equipment’s were customer is already into booking the ship mode, and we should be able to move those equipment out from the shop. So, largely we were at a risk from the perspective of raw material intake. But we were able to maneuver that quite well. And we were able to get most of our raw material within the time that we needed for project execution.
Thank you. Next question is from the line of Atharva Bhutada from Purnartha. Please go ahead.
So, I have just two, three questions. First would be, will our revenue booking will be similar to what it has been last two years where March has been a heavy revenue booking in quarter?
Yes, so March definitely would be better than Quarter 3 for sure, because generally quarter four is definitely loaded. But to be frank with you, it will not be as in the past because if you have heard us we have tried to mai ntain a very consistent quarter -on-quarter performance through largely focused on t he execution side. So, it will be higher than Quarter 3 but not the kind of loading that you would have seen in the past. So, as I said we should be ending the year comfortably just over 530 crores.
And so, last quarter the order book was standing at 872 crores in October and right now in December it was 814 crores. So, have we increased our execution or taken a slowdown what’s going on in the market?
No, I would not turn the word slowdown, largely if you se e as you know December is always slow month because most of the exports in Europe and US doesn’t operate during that time. And also January early a couple of weeks we lose on that. But, having said that, this is a trend which we see every year. So, we shou ld see now the order booking as I mentioned 900 crores the inquiry pipeline which we have , which as per our timeline should be closed within next two months. And based on the strike rate, we should be able to book as I said 100, 150 crores comfortably.
Okay. So, there is one technical question. So, I just want to understand how do you all reduce your scrap because steel like stainless steel will be your biggest material and heavy scrap would also like cause a lot of problems in p roject deliveries. So, how do you all manage to reduce the scrap project?
I would not say we reduce, but what we do is as you know all our material procurement is project specific, we don’t have any common material probably which is just lying in stock and we use it for any project for every project once the order comes in and the engineering drawings are made there is something called as material planning which is done specific to that pro ject and based on that we procure material. So, for every project a plate while layouts are made, we upfront know when we have bought the material what would be the scrap percentage out of it, because we use the software to do the perfect lay outing on the plate. So, by and large, before even we start cutting the plates we very well know what is the scrap percentage coming out of it, because we try and utilize the plate to the maximum extent possible based on the shape and size of the components. So, it’s not about probably reducing the scrap it is possibly probably of getting your yield highest possible depending on the shapes and cuts of the components.
So, just a couple of questions, the first, is it possible with reference to heat exchangers, are there any heat exchangers that we manufacture which don’t kind of require any license and they are common in the industry?
Sorry, can you just come again, please?
So, basically, just trying to understand like how we have a license , the helix license for a heat exchanger, I am just trying to understand if there are any heat exchangers that don ’t require particular licenses and are common for the industry to make?
Yes, there are many in fact, so what I understand is, we are talking about referring to helix heat exchanges, where we have licensee tie up with Lummus Heat Transfer . So, I would say yes, there are many common heat exchangers which do not need any specific licensee agreement. But having said that, your capability and your plan needs to be qualified with the customer to be able to do that. So, I would say on average in a year heat exchangers that we make only 20% to 25% would be licensed product and the balance would be the common heat exchangers with any of the qualified vendors into the customer list can bid for it.
Okay, understood. And just a follow up on this, like you mentioned that only 25% of our order book is kind of with license. So, is that kind of countable number of licensees across the world where we can license them?
Yes. So, that will be lot o f technologies which the licensor will license out. So, for example, helix heat exchanger, there’s only one licensor in the globe, which is Lummus Heat Exchanger, but they have many licenses around, so similarly there are as you know we have three technologies where we have tied up one is helix heat exchangers , one is MFL technology for heat exchangers and one is polymerization reactor for reactors and vessels. So, there are many more such which are at the higher end of the segment. As I mentioned in my last call too, we are in the process of discussions with those licenses to be on board to be able to make those complex equipment. It takes time of course to get qualified, but we are on that path.
Okay, thank you for that. Just my last question, in our overall product portfolio if we remove the heat exchanger what kind of market size are we targeting?
In terms of numbers?
Yes, numbers in terms of how big the market is.
So, as I said, overall, the market that Anup Engineering that we are interested in. There could be something higher in the segment where we are yet not qualified and we wish to get into , but there is a very large component of product segment which is down the line where we don’t intend to participate, because they would be small in size, smaller in thicknesses and based on our kind of a capability put in place we may not be competitive. So, if you look at only the segment that we wish to be part of it, roughly about 20,000 crores annually is the kind of opportunity that we see globally and out of which approximately about 50% to 60% would be heat exchangers and balance would be reactors and vessels.
Thank you. Next question is from the line of Vijay Kumar, who is an Individual Investor. Please proceed.
My question is, what kind of order book we are seeing in Blue Hydrogen, and can you give some picture on the EBITDA margin on hydrogen side?
So, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, on the hydrogen side we see a great push you would have seen that almost 33% of our revenue for Quarter 3 came from that. Also going forward the order booking that we have we see largely export orders coming from Blue H ydrogen side on the Western side of the world largely United States of America and Canada. So, the equipment in those remains the same for us, as we are making today, there are a large number of heat exchangers, reactors and vessels. So, th at portfolio remains the same except that the designing is a little different. There are some different specifications that we need to apply. But from capability perspective and manufacturing perspective, nothing changes for us. So, we will have from product side heat exchangers, reactors and vessels. And on the EBITDA profile, we don’t see much profile changing between hydrogen and oil and gas and petrochemica ls or any other sector except that, we generally see a lesser number of competitor profile participating for those because you need to get qualified with those reputed customers. So, the number of people competing would be a little lower. But on the margin profile, we don ’t see much change. So , short answer to your question, the EBITDA almost remains the same for us whether it ’s hydrogen or oil and gas.
Thank you. Next question is from the line of Aditya Agrawal from Ambit GPC. Please proceed.
Sir first is, wanted to understand what will be our current capacity utilization and what could be our CAPEX outlook for the next two, three-years?
So, when we talk about capacity for our kind of a business, normally we would talk about in terms of tons of fabrication that we can do. So, with our both facilities in Ahmedabad and Kheda, we roughly have about 15,000 metric ton nes kind of capacity. And the orders that we have are in the tune of 10 to 11,000 metric tonnes. So, we are roughly about 60% to 70% kind of capacity booking, we still can update about another 20% roughly to the capacity. In fact, as we said, we have already started the extension of our phase one where we had left one d ay manufacturing we partly build, so we are going to complete that , that would take about 15 crores to 18 crores so roughly about 18 crores kind of a CAPEX into the next year.
Understood. And sir the other question I have is, in terms of exports. So, currently it’s about 1/3rd about 33%. So, going forward, what kind of a number you are looking at would it be similar to this or with hydrogen, the share going up probably exports could also go up forward from here?
So, this year we will end at about 30% around that number next year, we will be 40 % to 42% kind of an export company. And that’s sure because we already have full visibility of orders in front of us. So, pretty confident that we should end just above 40%?
Alright. And sir my last question is in terms of margins, the guidance that you have, so currently we are still at about 22.5%, 23%. So, let say for FY25-26 would it be in a similar range, or could this go up going forward?
So, as I mentioned, in terms of EBITDA percentage we would not see it going up too much. As we are growing, we will have to get into more and more product segments to fuel our growth aspirations and what we feel is, as I have given guidance that we would wish to grow at 25% to 30% growth rate with a (+20%) kind of EBITDA. So, that’s the profile that we want to maintain, growth along with a decent EBITDA.
Next question is from the line of Ajaykumar Surya from Niveshaay Investment. Please go ahead.
Sir, my question is on , sir if you can just explain us the order cycle like do we get the orders from PPP player or direct customers and also in which part of the cycle do heat exchangers get deployed on the refinery field so, is it towards the end of the cycle or towards the beginning of the cycle?
So, to answer your first question on the order booking cycle. So, any orders that we take on an average our execution cycle time is 11 to 12 months, that’s kind of a product portfolio we are in, of course if there are large size equipment’s it may go even up to 14 but on an average it is anywhere between 11 to 12 months kind of an execution. And when do they get, and the customer profile, largely we get the orders from EPC companies or end customers. But having said this, if you look at probably a three- year average, you will find a 50%, 50% kind of a breakup that is 50% from tender business, which is generally PSUs, in India like Indian Oil, BP, HPCL and others and 50% would be from either end users, direct end users or EPC companies. So, it fluctuates year-on-year but if you look at the three-year average you would find this kind of a breakout 50%, 50% kind of a breakup. When does the heat excha ngers go and actually get commissioned, in the project cycle of course the civil takes the longest time civil and other piping and others and probably the heat exchangers would go and sit in the plant. Of course, it would again vary because it will depend on the sequence of installation which part of the corner of that whole project depending on the accessibility, but largely I would say probably about one and a half year before the commissioning or a year before the commissioning is where the heat exchangers would go and get installed on the foundation.
Sir you said that our heat exchangers get deployed during the end of the commissioning of any refinery and in the Indian context if I see the oil and gas CAPEX has been towards the last two, three-years have been p retty good. So, do we see any slowdown over there or what is that is giving us confidence of this 30% growth?
So, this confidence on the 30% growth comes from two fronts. One is, as I said, on the export side, the geographical spread that we are trying to get. If you have heard my calls in the past, the precise reason why we wanted to have this geographical spread is because we know this CAPEX cycle is cyclical in nature. So, having a larger spread would help us de-risk that simplicity, and all the efforts that we put into getting into exports are manifesting into real orders now, as I said 57% of our orders come from export. And what we are seeing is the projects and export largely on hydrogen account. And also, gas account is only increasing day by day. So, we see a lot of traction coming from United States, and a huge traction on the gas side from Middle East side. So, that’s something which is fueling a lot of inquiries back home. And again, on the Indian context, as I said you would have heard the announcement in the India Energy Week, the largest investment is going to be in the energy transition phase for next few years. That will be largely into doubling our refining capacity which India wants to do it befo re 2030. India wants to be a leader in petrochemical, so we are seeing a lot of pet chem plants coming up both in the public as well as private sector, we see a lot of PVC polysilicon , PTA plants coming up, which is a manifestation of that. And also, on th e energy transition towards greener side, be it in the hydrogen segment where we don’t have to do much difference it is the same product portfolio. So, for us getting into hydrogen business is a very seamless transition. So, on account of good visibility in terms of the projects globally, especially on hydrogen and the gas segment, and also back home. The projections and the investment committed by the government, we see a good traction on the investment, at least for next two to three-years on oil and gas, petrochemicals and fertilizer side including hydrogen.
Thank you. Next question is from the line of Romil Jain from Electrum PMS. Please proceed.
I just had a couple of questions. One is, you guided about 535, 540 crores of roughly revenue in FY24. So, just want to understand, that would mean largely single digit kind of growth on a Y- o-Y basis in Q4. So, I understand we have met it will be more than 30% growth for the entire years. But is there any constraint or does anything stop us from growing faster in Q4, or that will get accommodated in the coming years, which is FY25. So, just if you can help us understand that?
I would say it’s more about rationalizing our entire revenue for the year, with an equated quarter- on-quarter performance. And this is something which we have been talking about, rather than having quite a high spikes in quarter, we had planned the project planning was such that that we get a consistent performance on delivery, becaus e that is something very crucial to us. So, the quarter plan that I talk about is largely based on the contractual delivery dates of the order on hand to be delivered to the customers. So, it’s largely based on the order input and the contractual delivery dates from the customers and also coupled with our execution in terms of how much we can execute in a quarter. And of course, this will see a little bit of change from next year onwards when Kheda really gets into full steam, which is expected to get into full steam from quarter one with close to 150 crores kind of an order booked for that plant already, you see a change there from quarter one onwards.
Okay. So, what kind of growth are we looking for the next two, three years in terms of top line?
So, we stick to our guidance of 25% to 30% growth that we are looking at and with an EBITDA of +20%.
Okay, got it. Sir, the next question is on the day that we are going to add at about 15, 18 crores. So, as you mentioned 15,000 tonnes metric tonne is the capacity right now, so, how much will this new CAPEX add in terms of the capacity?
So, this 15,000, 16,000 metric tonne s on an average. Of course, it will again depend on the product portfolio that we choose, but it should take our capacity to about 16,000 metric tonnes.
16,000, okay. And lastly on the 12 c rores number in terms of revenue that you mentioned actually, I was not very clear on that, can you explain that part again?
So, what happens is largely if you see our revenue generation would be on the order book that we take from the customers based on the material being procured by us, that is we buy the material and we execute the equipment. Now, there was one order from a reputed EPC in India, where the material was on free issue basis. So, what happens is the material content is given free of cost by customers, so the value that we see is only our value addition. So, we do all the work, we execute it, but it doesn’t reflect in the top line because the free show material content is there. So, just for an understanding of execution, where we stand it why that is like-to-like if you add, if the material was in our scope, our revenue would have looked like (+12) crores than what it is looking like today, it was like-to-like comparison.
Okay, that means material has been given by the client, and hence it doesn’t get reflected in our top line?
That is correct.
Any impact you see on the Red Sea going ahead in terms of exports, because our exports are increasing. So, maybe till now we have not seen much of an impact, but going ahead do we see anything?
So, we have been talking to customers, in fact over the last month we had some results from the customers to discuss about it. So, the point is, even though our customers know the fact of this, customers know the fact that if they have to avoid this route, then they will have to take a longer route, they will have to book ships in advance. And they are already on the ir job. So, based on our deliveries, they are planning, they are shipping, either at Kandla M udra Port. So, it’s a fact which is now known. It’s not a hidden fact, people know, and customers based on their project importance and what we understand from most of the customers is this project, their project is very critical to them in terms of execution, and they are willing to go out and look at alternate shipping arrangements to take these equipment’s and be loaded there. Hopefully, this Red Sea concerns should go off quickly. But having said that, if it continues, then I am sure customers have got alternative options to take the equipment ’s. So, all in all I don ’t see based on my communication with the customer so far, that we should be impacted much. And when it comes to raw material imports, that’s in our control. We are trying to indigenize as much as possible or buy from Asia, alternate options wherever it is available for us.
Thank you. Next question is from the line of Prateek Giri from Subh Labh Research. Please go ahead.
Sir, needed a little bit of assistance in understanding the domestic , in understanding the order book numbers. So, in domestic this quarter, we have reported around 245 crores of order book. Vis-à-vis 259 crores last quarter, in September quarter this year. So, I just wanted to understand, should I add the DV SEZ order book also when I am taking domestic order book because I can see there’s a good downfall in domestic order book from 330 crores in June quarter to 245 crores in December quarter. So, am I getting it right or?
You are comparing June versus Sept?
No, I am just trying to u nderstand it sequentially. In June, we had 330 crores order book in domestic, then we had 259 and then this quarter we have reported 245.
You are reading right. So, the supply to a domestic market is higher than the order intake during this period. Yes, what you are saying is right, execution in the domestic is higher than the new orders. If you see in the June quarter, the export day and SE Z we were showing it combined. This time we had shown it separately. So, in 30th June 2023 , the opening order book was 319, which is now 570.
Okay, understood sir. So, I get that the execution for the quarter domestic business was a little higher. What, are you seeing any softness in domestic demand?
Practically, I would say no, of course it has not transpired into the order book, account directly. But there ’s a lot of traction that we are seeing, from private players. To other big private conglomerate, we see huge traction in terms of order finalization s probably in February and March. That will be pretty good, and I am sure you will see in the results when we come out at the end of the year. On the R &D, on the PSU side, yes, because there was sudden rush of so many projects finalization we have not seen them in the past, but now we expect it to come because there are a couple of projects lined up. So, by the time the tender comes out, it is going to take probably three to four months of time that we probably get that order.
That’s correct.
Understood sir, because even if you look at this quarters domestic top line, it is actually lower than the last quarter because last quarter we did around 110 crores in domestic and this quarter we did 96 crores.
So, this is all the order s which we have booked in the past, so they have a particular contract delivery date. So, based on that, we are executing. So, depending on which projects CDD falls into that particular quarter, we can’t compromise because there will be otherwise LDs on it. So, so we go exactly by the contractual delivery dates, and that’s how it reflects quarter-on-quarter. But having said this , pure manifestation of the demand should be what ’s the kind of inquiry pipeline that we are looking at, at any given point in time. So, if you have heard me even the last I said that we were around 900 crores to 1100 crores kind of a real time inquiry on hand. So, today as we speak also, we are about 900 crores of inquiries. Now, it’s a mixture of both export as well as domestic. That is on the card, so it augurs well for us, as long as the inquiry pipelines which is looking good, based on our appetite for the strike rate, depending on our order book and the capacity, we take the call to take it in a particular month or no t. But overall, inquiry pipeline should give us a lot of confidence.
Understood sir, very helpful. My second question on EPC and end customer is already answered.
50 on a two-year, three-year basis. Is that right sir?
Yes, so year-on-year it will change because sometimes you would find PSUs to be almost 70% and private customers and EP C 30. The next year you would just see the reverse. So, on an average three-year basis we would find about 30 plus, 50%.
Understood. And margin profile is again, is roughly similar?
Yes, I said it’s roughly similar, that’s correct.
Thank you. Next question is from the line of Atharva Bhutada from Purnartha. Please proceed.
I just had one question. So, since we are saying that, from the last three years , there is a 50:50, between PSU and EPC. And because we need a lot of working capital, is there any cash flow in terms of getting money on time when we take PSU orders or are we seeing a lot of delays?
No, we are pretty happy with the cash flows. We are getting our money ’s on time, whether it’s PSU or private customers, we are working with most of the reputed customers globally, and we are getting our payments on time, both advances as well as final dispatch payments. And that ’s exactly the reflection that you see on our working capital returns if you look at we have 4.3 tonnes in this quarter, which is I believe very good, if not the best, and that ’s a pure reflection of collections of money and also receipt of advances.
Thank you. Next question is from the line of Bhavya Sonawala from Samaasa Capital . Please go ahead.
Just one question, when we talk about probably our e xpertise of strength or the skill that we have, is it possible to explain the importance of design and fabrication is one more important than the other, if you can just throw some light on that?
I would say both are important , because as I said we don ’t have a standard product, we have every order that we get is a customized order sort of made to order to customer requirements. So, it all starts from engineering, which is an extremely , extremely important phase, because it is quite technic al in nature, you need to understand the details of the parameters that the equipment will operate in, which country it is located based on the ambient conditions that our parameters would change. So, design is definitely important and to add it to that, manufacturing because as I said this is a manufacturing which we make and the ASME code and we need to abide by all procedures and processes that align with that. So, the welding is extremely crucial , NDT that is you can’t have any defects it has to be defect free. So, I would say engineering and manufacturing both are equally important for execution of the projects on time.
Okay. And when we probably talk to our customers is it on these two levels engineering and probably manufacturing or is it one whole, is it like a particular order given as a whole, there is no different two segments to it?
No, we get a complete order right from engineering to procure of material, manufacturing and delivering to the point of their call.
Okay. And have we had any order where we have to only do the manufacturing and probably the design or the engineering part is given to us by the client?
Yes, sometimes we do especially when there is a repeat project l ike for example, if they have commissioned phase one or train one and they are putting an exact replica of the second then they would give us a drawing and then we would make as per that drawing . As possible, but I would say for 100 it could be one or two cases in that nature rest all we would be designing to fabrication to delivery.
Thank you. The next question is from Saket Kapoor from Kapoor Company. Please go ahead.
Firstly, sir for the Kheda part you mentioned that we are preponing, it has been mentioned in the press release that we are preponing the CAPEX, and we will be ready by Q1 of the next financial year and order booking is to the tune of 150 crores, this understanding is correction sir?
Yes, order booking so far for Kheda is approximately 150 crores for next year.
All would be in the 12 months period, so you should see a 150 crores kind of a turnover coming from Kheda next year.
Okay. And that will cover our fixed cost sir, 150 crores?
We will be surely profitable.
Okay. Sir when we look at our Q-on-Q numbers, if we compare our December quarter with the September numbers, we find a dip in turnover, and I was just listening to your answer where in some of the order that we have executed there in we have not taken the impact of the material costs. So, that is the only reason why we have seen a dip in turnover fro m 140 to 128 crores or is the order mix that has resulted in the same?
Largely it is because of that, but historically also if you see and I am sure you would have heard me on the call that, Q1 and Q3 this will be the two quarters which will be marginally lower than Q2 and Q4, on a lot of things like in Q1 it is more of holiday time right schooling and other, so we see an absenteeism of 30%, 40% of the skilled labor. So, that’s the reason why Q1 will be a slight dip and Q3 also because we have Diwali. So, the plant is shut for seven days of the quarter. So, Q3 and Q1 historically and also going forward you will find it a little lower than Q2 and Q4, but not like what was seen in the past that we had a very large spike, we are moderated, we are planning such that we don’t see a large impact. So, on that count, if you look like to like probably the Q3 has been better.
Yes, sir whatever you have committed in terms of the vagaries in revenue quarterly basically that has now been evened out, and we are getting the same set of execution for quarterly basis given the minor aberration. So, thank you for that. So, for the year as a whole we are likely to close at 540 levels, this is what you have committed earlier in the call.
Yes, we are +530 so around that number.
Okay. Sir, when we look at the last point on the other expenses part that has gone up Q -on-Q basis even on the lower revenue, so what explains this 4 crores increase in the other expenses?
So, you are looking from Q2 versus Q2, or Q3 versus Q3?
Q3 versus Q3, September ‘23 versus December ‘23.
Okay, so one major factor would be , so sometimes on some of the product which we sell, it is subject to a royalty. So, Helix Heat Exchangers whenever we make a supply we have to pay a royalty. So, probably that’s the number which you see in our result and in Quarter 3, we would not have paid much royalty as compared to quarter two.
So, the royalty, so some of the equipment like our Helix Heat Exchangers whenever we make and deliver such equipment’s we h ave to pay royalty to the licens or as that comes as other expenses.
Okay. So, this was the case for this quarter, we have Helix Heat Exchangers being delivered.
That is one reason other than that power and fuel cost has gone bit up because Kheda operation has reinstated well. So, these are the two major factor for higher other expenses in this quarter.
And the finance cost part sir, that has also been quite a bit different number although very small base but if you could explain?
So, till now, on the loan part is Kheda plant was under commission we were capitalizing the finance costs as per the accounting standard, as Kheda plant has commission that course is now coming to a P&L, right now the date is at roughly 40, 41 crores of which 20 crores is paid in the month of January. So, I assume that cost would come probably the 50% of what it is in Q4.
And lastly sir on the cost of material consumed to the revenue , this percentage depends on the order mix part but what should we penciling-in in terms of the cost of material consume to the revenue profile?
So, based on the current product portfolio that we are executing, we should see it in the region of 50% to 55%. Of course, as we keep moving up, probably next year and year after we get into more and more niche segments, this percentage could go up. But as we speak, based on the current profile, it should be anywhere between 50% to 55%, depending on the product portfolio.
Thank you. The next question is from Naysar Parikh from Native Capital. Please go ahead.
The first one is that, in your order book obviously, the domestic export mix is very different than what we have currently. So, just can you talk a bit about between domestic and exports in terms of the kind of product we are selling, or margin, et cetera is there a significant difference or how should we look at it?
Yes, so on the export side, we largely see the orders coming in from hydrogen projects, Blue Hydrogen especially, and it is coming from the regions of the United States of America, Canada and Nigeria. That ’s a major inflow w hen you look at the order book numbers, in terms of margins, I would not say that there ’s much difference between domestic and export. But as I said, in the past two, exports always give us a percentage or t o better margins at the end of execution on two counts, one is the advances are better. So, advances are better as compared to domestic projects. So, we end up making some money there a nd also on the FOREX side, generally when we estimate we are conservative on the FOREX side, so by and large we tend to make money at the end of execution. So, at the order book level, both would look the same, but at the end of execution, yes, export would turn out to be a little better than domestic.
Got it. And y ou mentioned that there is obviously some slowdown on the order intake on the domestic side. And you obviously said that there are inquiries good. So, generally, can you just give, can you talk about like are you seeing that the next few quarters, we will see separate demand at the domestic side will take some time to catch up or how should we think about it . Because generally for others, we are not seeing this kind of a domestic order book slowdown, at least on the capital good side?
Yes, so as I said there is a big inquiry pipeline even for domestic, especially for pet chem projects. And what we see based on our discussions with customers, we should be seeing them materializing in the month of March, pretty larger pieces of inquiry, the order intake should start flowing from March up till next month onwards. And most of it is coming from private players, large private conglomerates in India.
Got it. A nd on the heat exchanger side what proportion of your revenue was generally replacements versus actually new clients, new orders?
Again, would fluctuate year-on-year but, I can say probably about 7% to 8% is replacement rest goes for greenfield or brownfield expansion projects.
Thank you. Next question is from Saket Kapoor from Kapoor Company. Please go ahead.
Sir, a small point in terms of how we closing this year, if we look at our quarterly performance, it has been more or less stable as reported also in Q1 and Q3 having a slight impact on the lower side. But when we just do the back envelope calculation, Q 4 last year was closer to something like 144, 140 and this year also we are contemplating an execution of in a similar . So, what are the constraints, why are we not able to close the year on a growth rather than being very flat , if you could just explain that point?
So, it is largely as I said earlier, it’s all about how we have planned at the beginning of the year, we had a good overview of the entire booking for the year. So, we had a substantial order book position based on the contractual delivery date, we have planned the execution such that we don’t land up into any delays. And that’s how it has been planned. So, we are very clear of, what are the kind of equipment’s which are the orders that we are going to execute in Q 4. So, it’s a pure reflection of the order intake and their execution capabilities. So, of course having said we could try but as we see this is what the number looks like based in the planning and the context of delivery dates of those equipment’s.
Sir, you spoke about strong order pipeline in the pet chem segment and also for the PVC part, sir if I heard you rightly?
Inquiry pipeline, yes.
That’s correct.
And sir so what kind of, what could be the size of the order that we may be bidding for these and these are long gestation period so for pet chem and PVC. So, if you could give some more color, what are we eyeing sir?
So, even for pet chem and PVC, the product portfolio that we deal with it will be somewhere around 11 to 12 months kind of an execution for us , because that’s a product portfolio segment we are in , the overall inquiry bank, as I said as we speak now, we are standing at an inquiry pipeline of about 900 crores to be finalized in a couple of months period.
Okay. So, on closing order book of 813 crores and an executable of 140 crores for the next quarter, we will be replacing our order book to that extent, what should we contemplate to close FY24, 31st March closing order book to be in the likelihood.
So, as I said we should be adding about 100 to 150 crores of order book based on the choices that we make, because we also have to take care of our deliveries. So, based on that, if you look at the execution we should be maintaining this pending order book position.
We should be closing somewhere in this level only 820?
If you execute about 140 around and we add 140 so it will remain the same, only thing is, out of which closed to about 700 should be executable in the next year and balance would go into the year after. So, we would maintain the growth trajectory that we mentioned. So, we should be comfortably doing 25% to 30% growth even next year.
Okay. And does this includes 150 from the Kheda facility?
That’s correct.
Thank you very much. That was the last question, I would now like to hand the conference back to Mr. Reginaldo Dsouza, for closing comments.
So, thank you. And I once again, take this opportunity to thank my wonderful team, the Anupites, I call them and to each and every one who has contributed to this performance. A big thank you to all of you, our shareholders for your trust and standing by our side always. Thank you, and on behalf of my team at Anup, I wish all of you a very happy, healthy and prosperous life ahead. Thank you. Thank you so much. Bye, bye.
Thank you very much. On behalf of The Anup Engineering Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us . Ladies and gentlemen , you may now disconnect your lines. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This is a transcription and may contain transcription errors. The Company takes no responsibility for such errors, although an effort has been made to ensure a high accuracy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------