Thank you very much. We will now begin the question and answer se ssion. Our first question comes from Piran Engineer from CLSA. Please go ahead.

Congrats on the quarter, decent numbers in a tough quarter. Firstly, how should we think about slippages in the coming quarters? If you can give us a sense of m aybe what percentage of your customers are overdue, but they ’re still paying their EMIs, or what percentage of your GNPA customers are paying in EMIs that will give us some color on future asset quality?

So, broadly, see, given that overall industry narrative, Q3, our slippages will remain elevated. While in our portfolio, we see the bigger problems are in specific geographies and not necessarily the entire state, in parts of a particular state. But in terms o f percentages, Rajeev, just tell what the percentage is.

So, if I can answer, Rajeev here. Piran, I think, as we have mentioned, we have seen the slippages a little elevated in this quarter itself by Rs. 225 crores. What we have also highlighted is the DPD pool, which is the SMA -0, SMA -1 and SMA -2 buckets, where we have seen an elevation, especially in the EEB book, which is the microfinance sector by almost Rs. 500 crores. So, these are, I think, indications. The team will work hard to make sure that we are able to stem and improve our collections and stem this kind of an increase. However, I think with the elevated risk in the industry, I think we also expect some bit of an impact could come through. Overall, as we have guided our credit cost, our credit cost for the first half of the year has been 1.8%. We had 1.6% in Q1 and 2% in Q2. We had guided that we will be in the range of 1.8% to 2% of credit cost for FY5. At this point of time, we continue to have the same guidance with the belief that, yes, in the third quarter, the slippages could be elevated and the credit cost could be elevated further. But by the fourth quarter, we would believe that the market would start showing some signs of positivity returning back. And on an o verall basis for the financial year, we would still like to be within that range. However, we will continue to monitor this and in the next quarter, be able to provide a closer update on how we are seeing the market.

Could you also just share what percentage of your customers are unique to you? How many have 1 additional lender, 2 additional lenders?

So, Bandhan Bank Unique is 60%; Bandhan + 2 is nearly 80%; for us, Bandhan + 4 and above is ~4.5%.

We are more secured because the Bandhan + 4 and above is ~4.5%. So, mainly 60% is basically, we are the sole lender to the customer.

And also just on Slide 24, given the breakup of your other income. And there is this others line item which has more than doubled YoY. Just want to understand what is that? Is there something lumpy in that line item, which is Rs. 184 crores?

Piran, sorry, just correcting this. Unique to Bandhan is 60%, Bandhan + 1 is 80%, Bandhan + 4 and above is ~4.5%.

Yes. On the noninterest income, I think your question is on the others where we are seeing a figure of Rs. 184 crores. This actually includes a portion of income that we have seen from the treasury teams, which is basically profit on sale of certain investments and the revaluation gains, which totals to about Rs. 80 crores, which is not a sort of regular feature every quarter. So, this can be taken as a one-off for this quarter. And in addition to that, I think there are usual charges like the average quarterly balance charges, which are about Rs. 19 crores, and I think that constitutes the reason why exactly some of this number is higher.

And just lastly, one confirmation. Your Tier-1 decline of 50 bps. That’s just because you’re not adding the profit of the quarter, right?

Yes. So, if we add the profit for the half year, our total CRAR is at 15.6%.

The next question comes from Gaurav Bansal from Pvc Consultants. Please go ahead.

So, we have not taken any decision of that sort at this stage. So, the simple answer at this stage, no.

Gaurav, I would request if you just stick with the quarterly related questions, that would be great, please.

The next question comes from Prabal from Ambit Capital. Please go ahead.

Sir, some of your peer banks have mentioned that the forward flow rate this time has been quite high compared to the previous cycle. How is your experi ence on the ground, meaning if the account is turning into SMA, is the possibility of it becoming NPA has increased compared to the previous cycle?

Yes. Just give us a second.

Okay. I will take that. Vishal here. I manage the EEB business. So, overall, if you see, whatever elevation we have got on our SMAs, those typically, we’re able to always collect 50% and above. And like what Ratan said earlier that our total state -level problems would be there also in parts of states. Overall, on a pan-India level, we are not that much on delinquency front simply because we took prior action. So, parts of state s of Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, where we have seen some stress on our EEB book. Having said which, I would say that 50% of that, whatever got elevated, Rs. 500 -odd crores, we typically collect. So, Rs. 250 crores is something which we would like to work upon even more and get that amount collected over the times to come.

Further in totality, our SMA book incl. SMA-2 book are well under control and being better than the last year. No doubt, in September, a little bit mo vement is there. But if you compare September to the last year, the SMA -1 book was 1.1%, this year, it is 0. 9%. So, plus/minus is there. So, we’re much better placed as compared to last year same quarter.

And my second question was, we have seen a very strong growth in our Commercial Banking book. Just 3 to 4 years back, the NPL in this particular segment was as high as 10%. What is your feedback from the ground on asset quality in this segment? And how should we look at this going ahead?

So, our asset quality in commercial book as of now is pristine, I would say. In fact, 93% plus is A- and above. So, the book quality is absolutely strong. The reason why we are growing commercial book are twofold. One, clearly, we want to be growing a bit more secured. We also won some of these customers to be in our kitty to be able to do whole lot of other income businesses on trade, CMS, FOREX and transaction banking businesses. So, that’s a clear rationale. On retail book, it ’s growing at 90%. The NPA levels are at the same steady to improving. So, to that extent, I think retail is also looking quite good.

And how much of our Commercial Banking would be to NBFC MFI corporates?

Total Rs. 3,000 crores.

Rs. 3,000 crores is the NBFC MFI corporate exposure?

Right. Yes.

Sir, just last one question. On Tier-1, even if we include profits, which at 14% and industry - wide, we are seeing asset quality, too. Would you like to have more capital? Or say, would you be okay slowing down the growth in terms of capital? How to look at that?

See, as of now, our growth targets of 18% (+-/1) with more secured buyers will continue to happen. And given the profit -generating capabilities that we are demonstrating, we are fairly comfortable at 15.6%. Having said that, we will continue to watch this space and keep evaluating and then take a call at some point. As of now, for the next 4 quarters, we don’t see any need for us to do that.

Sir, on the Slide number 18, there is a table of vintage analysis. Just curious as to the disbursement done in the previous quarter, the June quarter. How ar e these disbursements becoming SMA and NPA? I mean what has changed in 90 days of customer assessment that accounts are becoming NPA and SMA?

So, the collection efficiency, if you look at it, our collection efficiency on the full paying customer, that has come down by 130 basis points as overall level. The partial paying and the nonpaying customers has gone up by that extent. So, that’s the reality. It’s an overall reflection of the over-leveraging and the overheating in the overall market. Although West Bengal, which is our largest territory, we are holding at 99%, but rest of India has come down by 100 basis points. So, it is a reflection of that. Clearly, while in my book, Bandhan + 4 is just about 4.5%. But after taking an exposure from me, somebody would have taken exposure outside. So, it’s an overall market liquidity issue. Some of these sales will flow into us. But as of now, it’s just about 0.02%, which is not very alarming.

Just for the further update on the vintag e analysis of the disbursement, disbursement of the Quarter 4 and the Quarter 1. Basically Quarter 1, the SMA -1 is 0.35%, SMA -2 is 0.17% and NPA is just 0.06%. So, whatever the book we created in the Quarter 1.

The question was that just in 90 days of disbursement, even having this much amount of SMA and NPA --

SMA-1, SMA-2, sir.

No, SMA-1, right? 0.02% number is what you are speaking here?

The totality, SMA-1, SMA-2 and NPA.

So, let’s go quarter -by-quarter. If you see first, let me tell you, whatever we have disbursed quarter-by-quarter, over the years, if you see, there is a marked improvement. If I see quarter of ‘24, if I have to compare it with quarter of ‘23. Similarly, the last 2 quarters of our disbursal of Rs. 13,000 crores, Rs. 14,000 crores, our total SMA is around about 0.5% and NPA is 0.06%. And that 0.06% also got a component of link loans. That some other relationships could be there, 1 or 2 loans here and there, which has resulted into NPA. Otherwise, fresh NPAs in the last 90 days have been 1 or 2 loans out of 15 lakh loans we would have disbursed. And deposits too, this 0.02% is something what Ratan again spoke of that there are customers who have taken a loan. These are 4 months vintage of a 12-month loan book. So, 0.02% of that would have also gone bad outside and similarly with us also, they have not performed. So, within giving a loan million 4 months, they have become delinquent. That is 0.02% of loans. So, we track this number very closely and take action as well.

The next question comes from Jai Mundhra from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.

Congratulations on decent number. I have a couple of questions. First is, so how do you look at the disbursement in MFI going forward? I mean it has been coming down and maybe the first half is usually a bit weaker. But as we go into October and fes tive season, how do you look at the disbursement in the MFI in the near term?

So, one, as a Bank, we have decided to be a bit more secured, which means that micro will grow, but the other businesses will grow at a much faster pace. So, that’s at one level. Second, generally, Quarter 3, Quarter 4 are better quarters for us traditionally. Having said that, this year, we have, in a sense, have been bucking the trend by growing well in Quarter 1, but Quarter 2, purposely, we have decided to be a bit more watchful and careful across various states and specific pockets and even specific BUs. And given the elevated risk in the industry, we would like to maintain similar watchful posture in Quarter 3 as well. In October, we are already seeing some bit of a better uptick, both in terms of collection efficiency in the regular pool. And if, therefore, it turns around positively by January, we will then have an opportunity to grow that book. So, as of now, I would say we will be more careful in containing the portfolio quality rather than focusing too much of a growth in the microfinance portfolio.

I think just to supplement, Jai, Rajeev here, 2 more points. One is, on an overall basis, as Ratan had mentioned, while the advances growth we’re expecting at 18% plus minus 1%, I think EEB, we will be working towards a growth of between 10% to 12%. And I think that is the broad range that we have seen in the first half, and we would continue to see. At the same time, I think the risks which ar e there are elevated. But we are also clearly evaluating the risk in which particular geographies and which particular states within the country and within that, which particular cities. And therefore, those targeted actions have been done for portfolio co ntrols in those areas. But other areas where the risks are lower, the team will clearly be looking at the opportunities for growth. And I think that ’s within the overall guidance that we mentioned of between the 10% to 12% growth.

And sir, on asset quality, I mean if I look at the slippages for this quarter for MFI that you mentioned at around 700 plus, this turns out to be around 5% on an annualized basis. Is there any difference in individual and group delinquency or you would believe that bo th are more or less operating in the similar band within MFI?

While both are operating in the similar band, but clearly, individual is doing better than the group at this stage for us. And that ’s the reality, and that ’s almost expected that when a bit of an industry overall issue happens, generally, the individual behaves better than the group.

And sir, a related question with growth and asset quality. So, in the last 2 years, you have been calibrated in the MFI loan growth, right, if I look at last 2 years, CAGR will be single digit, maybe 5%, 6% in MFI growth, whereas other players which have grown at a much faster pace. And hence, the industry itself has grown at a very higher clip. Would you believe that the lenders which have grown slower are better placed? Or because this time around, the asset quality issue is not in your assessment and you ’re not in your underwriting, but maybe the marginal lenders or the third, fourth, fifth lender, the issue possibly has come up from their side. Would you believe that the lenders which have grown slower are better off or there is not too much a preference?

I think, frankly, your question has an answer built into it. It ’s a fact that over the last 2, 3 years post COVID, the industry has been growing, our view is that, rather at a significantly higher rate of growth while you ’ve been growing moderately. And more importantly, we have also been taking a lot of guardrails and to improve our portfolio quality. So, some of t hese have been helping us to improve. Having said that, while we have 60% unique customers to Bandhan, 80% is Bandhan + 1, but we still have ~4.5% or let’s say, about ~6-7% as Bandhan + 3. And some of these are going to come back. And when the borrowers ar e coming back for renewal, we are obviously taking steps. We have also taken a few more steps in improving our bureau score, etc. etc. in specific pockets and geographies. Having said that, yes, we will still be holding on. That ’s why our credit cost guidance continues to remain in the 1.8% to 2% for this year. And we will look at it, review it and then come back to you with more information as we get it by end of Q3. But I would say that we are not isolated. We will still be better than others, hopefully, but we are not isolated.

Just adding to Ratan, basically, our main aim is for this quarter because keep in mind the current situation, we will more focus on our existing customers because we know they are the regular customers paying us fo r the last so many years. So, our main focus for the growth will be our existing customers as compared to the NTB.

And sir, just related to this, RBI has recently banned 4 MFI lenders. And if you want to put together the combined AUM, it is a higher single digit at the system level, right? Now they will probably not disburse loan incrementally. Is that an asset quality risk at the system level? Or you believe that is not a problem even from asset quality perspective?

So, these entities who have received that regulatory sort of guidance show of action are very strong entities per se. And our belief is that they obviously are taking corrective actions and quickly go back and ensure that suitable steps are undertaken. Having said that, a certain amount of disbursement moving out of the industry, definitely would pose a risk to the overall industry to an extent. But given the size of these entities put together, may not necessarily be too high. So, the risk may not an additional risk given this fact. But overall, over-leveraging and its impact, how long it sustains is something that we are still also observing.

And last question, sir, from my side, is we have grown significantly in the secured book this time. I mean MFI has been degrowing and there is a significant growth in secured. And still, the yields for the margin impact has been very resilient. How would you explain this that MFI degrowing and some of the secured assets growing at a very fast pace and yet the yield s have not been impacted too much? I mean, is that the pressure likely in the coming quarters? Or the yield of those products are also relatively comparable?

So, the short answer is yes, that in the coming quarter, we may see some stress in the overall yield, but we will still remain in the range of guidance that we have been providing. Rajeev, if you could give a bit more color to that?

Yes. So, I think 2, 3 factors. One is within the secured book, obviously, we are also lo oking at the products which can give us good yield. So, I think there is that calibration that the business team continuously looks at. Second is on a year -on-year basis, if you look at it, while quarter - on-quarter, the slippages may have been elevated and the portfolio quality of the credit cost might be elevated. On a year-on-year basis, we still see an improvement compared to the levels that were there last year versus the levels now. And therefore, there is that much of fillip that comes through on the net interest income or net interest margin and the interest income as well from a year-on-year perspective. So, I think that comes through as well. But as Ratan rightly mentioned, some of these do have a bit of a lag effect. So, we should see, I think, som e moderation in the next quarter. Albeit we still, as we have guided, our broad range of net interest margin between 7% to 7.5%. Our endeavor is to be within that particular range, and we feel confident about that.

The next question is from Param Subramanian from Nomura. Please go ahead.

Most of them have been answered. But on Slide 6, you ’ve given your loan mix and the last 2 years, we have seen a sharp increase in the retail loan mix. I think over the last 2.5 years, the number has gone up about 4x. So, if you could just remind us what are the products that contribute to this retail mix, which are the predominant products? Yes, that’s question 1.

Yes. So, I think within retail, the growth is coming through primarily from secured assets, which is gold loans, the auto loans, which is both 4 -wheeler and 2 -wheelers, as well as commercial vehicle, commercial equipment. So, these are the key drivers of the growth within retail assets. And we have a team, which is really spread across the entire country. We are looking at sourcing across the country. And clearly, the progress in terms of the year -on-year growth as well as the sequential growth has been quite remarkable.

So, I just want to add that we will continue to see a significant growth in retail portfolio because 1,700 branches that we have, we still have enormous amount of opportunity to sort of leverage that, do cross -sell through these existing branches, as also tap some of the other potential, including digital lending channels and others. So, to that extent, I think that portfolio will continue to grow. But albeit, our focus is to grow more secured in the re tail portfolio as well while maintaining the portfolio quality.

And Param, Slide #10 in the deck actually gives you more details. It has the breakup.

Secondly, the credit cost guidance that you’ve given for the full year includes the write-back that we are going to get from CGFMU or how should we look at it?

No. No, the CGFMU money that will come through, as we have mentioned, will be part of our other income because the associated portfolio was already techn ically written off in the March quarter. And on written -off accounts, if you get an income, it ’s actually going to the other income. So, that’s not part of this. So, this is on the current sort of NPA books that we are basically guiding you the credit cost.

The next question comes from Nitin Aggarwal from Motilal Oswal. Please go ahead.

So, a few questions. One is on, if you can talk about how much of the yield differential between the EEB book and the rest of the segments, like the retail and the small enterprise loans? Because if I see like, there is a 400-basis point drop in mix of MFI and CD ratio has also declined sharply, but margins have been very resilient and dropped just 20 basis points. So, just explain this math actually.

But then why the NIMs or the yields have held up so well because there is a 400 basis point exchange with EEB going down, then the impact on margins?

Two points, as Rajeev mentioned. One is this l ag effect. Second is clearly the slippages on the credit cost has been better compared to the previous year. So, these are the 2 broad factors.

My question is on the experience that we had with the CGFMU claim and the audits that happened. So, what will our approach be to the CGFMU cover on an incremental basis? How do we plan to go about that?

So, the CGFMU audit, the experience has been a little bit exceptional. I will tell you why, because this whole portfolio is FY 21, which was a peak of the COVID period. And therefore, we would believe for the sake of humanity, that similar experience doesn’t happen to anybody in the future. Having said that, in general, we believe that if there are opportunities available in terms of participating in the government schemes and the grants and in some of these valuable schemes, we will continue to participate in that in future as well. How, how much, which way, that obviously the future will tell us.

And last is on the ret ail assets, which you ’re seeing a healthy growth. So, how many products have you really broken even in this segment? And what is the ROE that you make in this portfolio?

I think retail assets’ journey started only a couple of years ago for us. It’s been 2 to 3 years. So, as part of the journey, it ’s still early stages, the business is ramping up quite well. And I think any new business, which gets started does take time to break even and increa se profitability. Having said which, I think year-on-year, we are seeing the overall contribution of this business improving. But it takes time for our business to fully mature, like we have some of the other businesses, which have been there for some time as mature businesses. We are working in that direction for retail as well.

The next question comes from Prakhar Sharma from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Congratulations and best of wishes. I wanted to ask you, you had made material changes to your underwriting policies introducing the cooling off period, the 30-day, 60-day, 90-day period. So, can you discuss how much of your book has actually gone through this change of underwriting standards? And do you think that’s one reason why the book will behave well? And secondly, can you discuss what sort of investments you have made in the broader collections and recovery platform?

So, I will answer both. So, one is that out of the total Rs. 60,000 -odd crores roundabout book that we have, Rs. 3,000 crores will be pre -April 2023 regime when we started putting those cooling period guardrails. So, that’s a limited size of the book that we still have outstanding in our book today. Therefore, is it one of the factors? Definitely, yes. That cooling period that we introduced has definitely an impact on our portfolio quality. But I will still maintain the fact that given the overheating, overleveraging in the industry for the remaining percentage of 4.5% - 5%, we are not isolated. To that extent, it will still remain elevated for us in the next quarter. We believe that Q4, it should turn around and turn positive. The second question that you had was?

Investment in collection.

Investment in collection, we are implementing the best -of-breed collection system. I will not name it, but that’s something which is the best-in-class system, which is used by the very scale players. We hope to go live with that pretty much by end of this quarter. Also, we are deploying more collection resource across the entire network of banking outlets that we have because not only that we are seeing putting a dedicated collection officer helps in improving the collection in the early buckets as well. So, we will continue to make that investment in that area.

And is it possible for you to share the exposure, the EEB segment exposure for the top 5 states individually? You’ve shared for West Bengal , but is it possible for you to share for the other states, the top 5?

Top 5, we have given that.

Sorry, have I missed it?

If I have to add here, we have really invested quite a bit on our credit structure. We are one of the very few organizations who have got an independent credit vertical across our EEB segment, which is not there if you see in many of the organizations. In terms of the bureau scores also, we have been stringent in terms of the areas where it has not performed well. across the industry. So, these proactive measures of ensuring stringency on our growth and being conservative has helped us in good stead if I have to compare it to the other market players. So, that’s one. Other thing what Ratan spoke in terms of collection. The entire setup is there, which distinguishes between 60 DPD, which business is responsible for collection, and beyond 60 DPD, it ’s independent collection vertical augmented with collection system coming up. With these good practices, we have ensured that we have to compare to my peer growth, even with an elevated SMA bucket numbers, you have to compare a much better off in terms of last year comparison, vis-a-vis, my peer group comparison. On the top 5 states, just to add up.

So, maybe I can just read out. So, the top 5 states that we have is West Bengal, which has roughly around 36%.

Rajeev, this is only the EEB part, right?

Sorry, can you give the percentages also?

Yes. One second. We will just provide that.

We don’t have it ready. But what we have on the back of the call, I could say, West Bengal is the top in chart. Then we have Bihar. We have Assam, Maharashtra and MP, in that order.

Got it. Probably Bihar is the one where, among the top 5, where you have the highest level of stress building up?

So, Bihar is holding up pretty well for us. West Bengal is doing very well. Assam, as you see, is doing extremely well for us. Odisha is a little bit of a problem. Parts of UP, bit of a problem. Maharashtra, parts of Rajasthan, bit of a problem. So, it’s like not the whole state, it’s just parts of it.

Interestingly, you are saying that in the top 5 states, 5 states are holding up well. It’s outside the top 5 states where you are seeing a higher elevated sort of --

Maharashtra is elevated, in parts like what Ratan spoke. Bit of UP, Eastern One is also elevated and that’s one of the markets as well. Our good state that’s still continues to hold good is West Bengal, which is our state, which we have good strength here. Bihar for us is doing very well.

That’s interesting to hear.

And these are 2 large big states for us.

Assam is also doing well.

Assam is doing very well. So, the top 3 states, the ones that are really doing well.

And my last question. It’s slightly contextual. Can you give us a sense of what ’s happening on the ground in terms of getting access to credit because this segment of customers do rely on getting access to slightly steady state of credi t flow. But if lenders are always cautious about whether they will be the last ones to be paid off. So, is there a credit freeze in the market? Is there a probably more rationed credit, but not a freeze? So, can you give us some flavour of what’s happening on the ground?

There’s no freeze per se. Look, the SRO guidelines have been sort of adopted by most of the MFIN partner players. 10% to 12% drop in disbursement is clearly sort of seen in the overall market for the 4-plus lenders. So, to that extent, if someone is already overleveraged with 4-plus lender exposure, that clearly, there is a bit of a guideline and most of the players have adopted to it.

The next question comes from Abhishek M. from HSBC. Please go ahead.

I have just one question. Your credit cost guidance for the year, how much have you assumed for EEB or for MFI basically?

Around 3% plus.

And do you think that is sufficient given whatever slippages, et cetera, you have seen so far?

Yes. So, like I had said earlier, I think this is within assumption that whilst we are clearly seeing that the risk is elevated and we have seen the impact of that in second quarter, and we expect that impact to come through in the third quarter as well. We do have a belief that by fourth quarter, the situation should start to turn around to some extent. That is a belief as of now. However, as we have said that we will continue to monitor this. And if this becomes prolonged, we will certainly come back by the next quarter with an updated guidance.

Ladies and gentlemen, we would take that as the last question for today. I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Ratan Kumar Kesh, MD and CEO, for closing comments.

Thank you, everyone, for joining the call, and thank you for your continued support. We look forward to your support in future as well as we welcome our new MD and CEO and take this brand to a new level. Thank you so much.

Thank you, everyone.

On behalf of Bandhan Bank, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines.