We will now begin with the question-and -answer session. The first question is from the line of CA Garvit Goyal from Nvest Analytics Advisory LLP. Please go ahead.

Good evening, sir and congrats for decent execution in a tough quarter. My first question is on the geopolitical event considering these kind of events are happening and our growing exposure in the US where there is a rising risk of tariff on pharma, so, how Caplin is going to mitigate the same and do you think like is it going to result in any slowdown in our growth in the near term at least?

In general, I know it is better to actually cross the bridge when we reach there because he has not announced it and it is not going to be that easy for him to announce this one. If he wanted to do it, he could have done it also, is it not? And then second issue is if you look at our business, especially the bottom line is not very high. It is easy for us to actually handle that kind of actually profitability with one more country or two more countries actually in Latin America or even actu ally in West Africa. So, it is not going to affect our growth. As you know well, there are three stages for any company , growth, status quo and decline. The decline and status quo will not happen. Definitely, there will be growth. In a worst case scenario, there will be a slowdown on the top line, not on the bottom line of cash flow.

Yes, in addition to Chairman's quote, please note that today, over 90% of our business in the US is B2B where we supply to the larger companies and distributors that buy our products and then sell to other buyers in the US, t he wholesalers and hospital networks and things like that. So, technically, the tariffs do not fall on to us. It is actually paid by the person that is going to be importing the product into the US, #1. #2, remember that whatever tariff that happens to everybody, not just one company. So, while there may be some amount of realignment that we will need to do when it comes to Caplin Steriles USA, that is still about 5% of the business only right now. So, like Chairman said, I think we need to cross the bridge when we get there. There is also I think a lot of information available online. There is something called the Sec. 232 investigation that is going on, which will probably be concluded in sometime in the future, after which the Trump administration will take a call, we suppose. But again, anybody's call and nobody really has a right answer to any of this at this moment.

One more thing I would like to add. I think I have seen a news in the media that 30 companies are the ones who control I think 80% -90% of the business, which is happening actually in the US. And we are not part of those 30 companies. So, the impact will not be that severe to us. When a company goes to the extent of selling 50%-60% of their business in the US, then it is not going to be that easy actually to wriggle out and create another market. I hope you would agree with me.

Understood, sir. And that means for now, whatever the rate that we are growing, we will continue that, right?

Yes, definitely sir.

Yes, one other information also that just is on top of my head, i n fact, when the tariffs were first routed out, we started doing a little bit of a study as to what our portfolio looks like and how this can be replaced by onshore manufacturing. So, we are in a position where less than 10% of the products in our portfolio currently has US manufacturing. So, that gives us a little bit more comfort level that even if tariffs were to apply, most likely it is going to be applied to everybody that is on the market. Because like I said, 90% of all the products in our portfolio are not really manufactured by others in the US at this point. So, how that will change in the future is anybody's guess. But once again, goes back to our original statement that we will be one of the last ones to get affected or the least ones to get affected.

I also would like to actually mention that in the course of my speech, I only said, we are not going to focus on the vanity metrics. Top line is vanity, bottom line is sanity, and cash is king.

Thank you very much, sir. And secondly, on our CAPEX side, our OS D facility, last quarter, we mentioned the timeline as Q4 FY26 and now it is Q3 FY27. It is a big change. So, can you please explain some reason for it?

Are you talking of our Onco facility?

This is the Oral Solid Facility.

Yes. Okay.

Yes. So, basically, let me just explain. So, over the last three, four months, you can all imagine that we needed a very careful wait-and-watch approach. We need to understand what would be the right strategy for us and where we would be utilizing our next round of CAPEX, where we will be utilizing our cash in the next level of projects that we need to be putting together -- should it be in India, should it be closer to the market, should it be actually at the market? All of these things, I think it is a very dynamic environment that we are all living in and we need to make sure that we take the right decision. Because typically, what happens is these CAPEX take about three to four years to complete all of the validations and then churn out products from there. So, we do not want to hurry and then make a mess of it or we do not want to hurry and then get to a situation where we leave it half done and then we need to move from there. So, I would say that we are adequately covered. In fact, one other big advantage that we have is we have been able to connect with a lot of Chinese and also a couple of Indian companies that have the necessary approval and scale that is available for us to do contract manufacturing for OSD products. So, I would say that even if it gets delayed by a further one year also, we are not going to be affected by that delay.

Correct. I would like to mention here that I told you about the recent trip to China , there are plenty of companies who have completed actually the entire facility , t hey also registered some of the products, but they have not been in a position to do business. China is very good in terms of actually hardware. When it comes to regulation and marketing, they are very keen to associate with actually some Indian companies and we have been having an office for the last 18-years , hence, we are in a position to reach to many companies. I have found as actually the COO has told , it is better to delay rather than actually hurry up and invest your money, which is not a real asset li ght model. We have to go for asset heavy when it is needed and when there are opportunities to go for asset light model. If you look at all the big companies like multinationals, they prefer to go for generic outsourcing. If it comes to innovation or incremental innovation, they think of their own. So, it is not the facility which is going to give us actually the returns. It is the business model and the number of registration. Today, we are getting a lot of dossiers from the Chinese companies and some other even one or two actually other companies from Turkey also they showed their interest to associate with us. Hence, we are focusing more on North and South America. After the announcement of Trump, of course, we are sure that it is not going to affect us. We do not want to be judgmental. Our focus will be much more on Latin America because we know this market, especially the bigger geographies like Mexico, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, then smaller geographies where we are expanding into in the form of Paraguay, Uruguay, these are capable of giving us the best of the best business for our company.

Understood, sir. And lastly is on GLP-1 side. So, can you spend two, three minutes on explaining the opportunity for Caplin in this particular area and how exactly are we going to capitalize that?

So, in Latin America, if you see, we already have a wide portfolio of antidiabetic products. So, this will be an add-on to our portfolio. But the truth is, this is a product that has had a lot more visibility in the larger market such as US and Europe, etc., So, for us, it is important that we launch this because of the fact that it is a good portfolio product, but also the trust that Caplin as a brand has built up over there puts us in a very good position to make this successful. Now, the differentiation in how we formulate the product in terms of usage is it going to be a pen device, is it going to be something else that we are going to be launching in the market is where we need to be a little bit creative around. But if you ask us what will be the market size and all of that, it is a difficult question to answer because there has been a lot of shortages , there has been a lot of new products that are entering the market. Even now, I think a very small percentage of the population that is supposed to be using it, is still using it. So, we would probably know a lot more after we have launched the product next year.

Got it, sir. That is it from my side and all the best for the future.

Thank you.

The next question is from the line of Aryam aan Agarwal from Money Storage Asset Management. Please go ahead.

I was seeing the previous presentations that you were mentioning about M&A opportunities. I want to know if you are still looking out for those opportunities or anything in the pipeline?

So, the question was about any potential M&A opportunities. Are we working on anything right now?

The acquisition actually, yes, definitely we will be interested if it is meaningful. When there are opportunities in the form of acquiring the products, that will be our first actually choice. The reason is currently we are not in a position to understand geopolitics and geoeconomics. And if we acquire a product, then we know what will happen. We will be in a position to understand whether we can market this product in the US or in Latin America or in other markets. If you acquire a facility, unless you have the right people to manage and also without even understanding what will happen in the deglobalized world. As I told you in the course of my talking, many more countries will also follow the path of protectionism. At that point of time, one has to look for acquisitions. Now, as I told you, we will go for facilities in two countries. These countries are Mexico and Guatemala. And that itself actually will make us invest money in such a way that will help our business in the long run.

Got it. And what growth rate can we expect going forward from here on in terms of your bottom line?

Yes. At this juncture, we do not want to tell you what w ould be the growth rate because if you ask me after 2 , 3 years, we will be doing very well. We are very sure that we will do very well because the markets which we are into is and we know the pattern. Anything which is predictable is repeatable. And in every market, as you know well, when you get into smaller to larger geography, the registration time actually is the most important factor. Once it is registered, we are sure that in another one and a half, two years, we will have 200- 250 products in Mexico itself. When that happens, we will keep the goods in the warehouse. In Mexico the Government supports local companies and they hold strong influence in the market. That is the reason most of the foreign companies may not be in a position to supply. Whereas when we complete the registration, we actually decided that we would keep the goods actually in our warehouse. In 1% if we do not get the tender, then we can supply the products in the private market. So, this is the strategy. So, we are very sure that we will not only sell in the private market, but also in tenders. That will increase the business manifold.

All right. Thank you.

Thank you, sir.

Thank you.

The next question is from the line of Tushar from Motilal Oswal. Please go ahead.

Thanks for the opportunity, sir. Sir, just with respect to these PFS lines, which more or less are complete at Caplin Steriles Phase 2, so, while we sort of register it for regulated market, but till that time, is there a scope for utilizing this facility either as a CDMO and for the other markets where this GLP opportunity is opening up maybe before the opportunity in the regulated market?

Yes. So, a couple of points here. #1 , Tushar, is we are actually looking at launching many of our vial products into PFS products, converting them from vial into a PFS product, where they will go by what we call as a post -approval supplement in the US. So, typically when new products take about 10 to 15 months to get approved, a post-approval supplement takes only six months. So, for XYZ product, if we have a vial already or a bag already approved, our idea is to convert several of these if the case may be feasible into a prefilled syringes. #2, we are also going to be doing our GLP product for our current markets from this facility and also our CP-1 facility because some of the new countries that we are entering into, like Mexico and Chile, will require regulatory approval, which we already have from this site. #3, I would say that when it comes to CDMO, we are always open. We are not against it. The only thing is we feel that there is adequate capacity. In fact, if you read some reports, it says that there is probably overcapacity when it comes to this GLP -1 CDMO space. So, I d o not know how much of that is accurate, but we are open to it. We are not against utilizing our capacity for CDMO for GLP.

Understood. So, that is helpful. Secondly, now these API facilities are sort of upgraded and completed. So, will that start reflecting in the margins given that this is more like backend integration for us?

Over a period of time, not immediately. What we are going to do is we are going to secure our supply chain as much as possible by filing second sources for many of our key products in the US and Latin America. But for it to reflect in the bottom line and stuff, I think we are still talking about some time away. I would say that at least 2 years away, not now.

Understood. This is like alternate source filing typically takes 6 to 9 months.

So, we will need to do some amount of development, not full scale. It will probably be a couple of months of development. We will need to do batches and then put them in stability for 6 months and PAS would take another 6 months. So, typically it is 12 to 15 months for the approval to come through. But there are also products where it is going to be a primary source as well. But again, we need to complete US FDA approval, EU approval, whatever it is, and then only go for all this. So, this is, I would say, a mid-term kind of a target, not short term.

Understood. And just lastly, if you could, maybe I missed in the opening remarks, which you already highlighted, Caplin Steriles sales, EBITDA, PAT for the quarter?

I will request Mr. Sathya or CFO to take this thing.

Yes, thanks, Vivek.. So, for the quarter, Capl in Steriles consolidated turnover is Rs. 108.48 crores with EBITDA of Rs.27.99 crores, PAT is Rs.7.95 crores.

Thank you. That is it for me.

The next question is from the line of Vedant from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.

Great. So, thank you for the opportunity. I just wanted to know the management comments on the LATAM market performance for the quarter and how could we see this market shaping up in the coming year or two?

Okay. See, coming to the performance of LATAM, I would actually request the CFO to give you the numbers so that you can understand that we have continued to do well actually in LATAM market and the best is yet to come because we are just entering the bigger geographies as I told you before. However, I will ask the CFO to give you the numbers.

Thanks, Chairman. We have got the full number and also the US number. Reminder is all coming from the LATAM. Of course, Africa has a very nominal contribution to that. So, we have grown 7% in LATAM market for the quarter over the last year corresponding period. Okay? So, in terms of profitability, out of Rs151 crores, barring with Rs.8 crores from USA, the rest all came from there.

My second question is about the GLP-1 product. So, I think the launches of our GLP-1 products will take place in LATAM market, correct?

Correct.

Yes. In which quarter could we see the ramp-up or their effect on the revenues?

Yes. As I explained to a previous person on the call, this is a new product, right? And the area itself is quite new. The segment itself is quite new, especially for Latin America, which did not really have consistent supply of the brand because they had multiple shortages and issues in the US and Europe market also. So, this is an evolving space. We will definitely have this as one of the products in our portfolio, especially because we have quite a good presence in Latin America in the anti -diabetes range, including insulin in one of the countries, and we are also getting insulin approved in some of the other countries where we are operating in. But we do not have any sort of numbers when the ramp-up will happen, etc. , We will be certainly within the first wave of products going in. But different countries have different approval times, right? Some countries it is about 6 to 8 months, some countries can take up to a year. But I think we will probably need to evaluate it as and when the launch happens. And there is no specific numbers or anything that we are targeting with it at this point.

Any timeline could be helpful if at all there is?

In terms of launch, we are probably looking at next September to October is when the launch is going to happen. But remember, there is a lot of competition here. I think even within India, even exporters from here, there will be a lot of competition. We are not worried about the competition because, like I said earlier, C aplin as a brand is very well established there. So, there is a lot of trust with the product that we bring to the market. But the market in itself, is it large enough, is it growing? All of that we will only know after we launch.

Thank you so much. That clears my question. I will get back into the queue.

The next question is on the line of Deekshant from DB Wealth. Please go ahead.

So, sir, in the last two quarters, we have been talking about our growth. And Mr. Chairman had mentioned that the growth will not be marginal going forward. And I think in Q3 call. And we have also talked about that in the next 18 to 24 months, it is going to be somewhat of a similar trajectory of growth. But, sir, we have never talked about what kind of growth can we see post this two and a half, three years timeline. So, let us say that 24 months from now, what kind of growth can we see and what is the opportunity size for us? Can you paint us some sort of opportunity picture here, what picture would really be helpful for us?

Yes, I would like to convey this way. See, currently our strength is actually the cash flow. You must have seen the liquidity and the liquid assets. Wherever we are building actually all this is going to be in the form of actually keeping the goods next to the customer. So, that happens actually in bigger geographies like Mexico and other countries in South America, Latin America, in fact, we just started our warehouse in Chile. So, maybe after two years, We are 100% sure of doing a business of say $50 million in that country alone, Chile. Mexico is still a bigger country and we are only waiting for the registrations to be completed. It is too early for us to understand how long it would take to complete the registration in Mexico. This is one country where big companies can influence registration process. So, we are waiting and we are also networking with some of the important people to help us to complete the registration and all. So, after we start doing this type of countries like Mexico, Colombia, Chile and later in Brazil, I am sure maybe after three years, we will have double-digit growth and it should be, in the form of 20%-25% also after three years. That is for sure, a). b), How it is possible? When you have surplus cash, when we focus more on actually Latin America, definitely we will go for some acquisitions. That will also multiply our revenue and profits. Is it okay or you would like to ask any other questions, please?

So, sir, last three years growth has been around 14% -16% and from what I can infer, you have mentioned that this year and next year would be somewhere in the similar line. So, is it fair to say that FY28 onwards, our growth is going to be around 25%?

20% to 25%, yes. After FY 2028-29 , yes.

Sir, secondly, there has been some change in the management in the last six months, which is the senior management, a couple of them have resigned and there has been one new appointment of Mr. Vinayak Dinkar and three resignations have been there in April, May and July. So, what is happening in our senior management team , is there a reshuffle happening? Could you just give us some light here?

Coming to the R&D person who left, we in fact have good people, actually, who are capable of going for complex products and some of the products are very unique also for our future business. So, there is no concern in this. One other person, of course, it is something unexpected. We expected something extraordinary but then realized there could be mismatch in expectation vs performance. So, we had to separate. Other than that, actually, there was an other person taking care of external work in the form of meeting the offic ials and getting the licenses and all. It was these people at the senior management level who got separated. No Company wants the employees to separate, that too at the senior management level . Sometimes what happens after having stayed in the company, there are people who are asset to the company. They love the company. We also know we love the people. We understand we have to actually have a very good relationship with our employees and customers. Retaining them is the most important thing. At the end of the day, if it is not going to help the company, do you think that we will be able to keep them?

Got it, sir. So, we are now looking to bolster up our senior management even better?

Thank you.

The next question is from the line of Ketan. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi! Thank you for the opportunity and many congratulations for a good set of numbers. Sir, I have got two questions. One is, we are a largely generics company and for a generics products company, I feel the margins are very high. So, are these sustainable for the mid -to-long term is my first question, sir.

Okay. As I told you in course of my actually conversation with our investors, it is not the generic that really gives you the money, it is the business model that actually makes you this kind of actually cash flow and profits. Of course, in fact, I had to tell this to one of our investors, we keep our goods next to the customer. Initially, when we went to the smaller geographies, it was more of a physical risk. Now, of course, we are used to it. The pattern that has helped us we understand, and we continue to do the same business and we are doing it actually, now that we started in Chile like one month ago, we started our warehouse, which is nothing but stock and sell next to the customer. Same we will do actually maybe in one year's time in Mexico. And then the front end, which was started in US, I think the CEO will tell you when exactly it was started. These are things which really helps you to increase your cash flow and profit. It is all about business models.

When it comes to US business as well, I know that we cannot paint multiple people with the same brush. But what will be pleasantly surprised is the injectables continue to give decent margins. And as long as we keep compliance levels very high, as long as we are able to maneuver all of the issues that we face at the facility, etc., with a high degree of compliance and keeping the patient at the top of our head, I think there is definitely margins that is left to be achieved. And in the pas t, we have had to share 50% of our profits with front end partners. And typically, what happens is some of these very large companies, when the gross profit goes below a certain level, it is us that need to shell out something from our pockets to make sure that their margins remain whole. So rather than that, some of these slightly more commoditized products, we have been able to launch them in the US and our gross margins are upwards of 50% over there. So, I think margins are not so much of a concern for us in both areas.

I would like to add one more thing. After six years, I have been to China in the recent past. And China is the one actually where we started our outsourcing initially. Now, of course, we do in India too. The second stream of revenue in the form of asset -light model will start actually from China. That will also add to our bottom line. That will help … that will create a healthy bottom line. The products that we are outsourcing, we are going to outsource actually in China are value-added generics in the form of biogenerics a nd some of them actually are biological products too. So this definitely, we are very confident of actually our bottom line. It may take a little time t o increase the top line and our cash flow and profits will continue to be good actually. That is for sure.

That is very heartening to know. My second question, sir, is we started the warehouse in Chile. So in this quarter, Q1, do we have some revenues? And if not, we expect some good revenues in this financial year?

Yes, Chile, of course, we can not expect extraordinary business from Chile in the first two years , because Chilean market, 80% is tender and 20% is private market unlike Mexico. So in Chile, what happens, we select products , we do not go for all the products where the margins are very meager. And that is one of the reasons, we are more a bottom line -driven company, not top line -oriented company. So yes, definitely we will do some business which will be better than before.

Okay. Thank you so much, sir, and wish you all the best.

The next question is from the line of Aristak from ICICI Bank. Please go ahead.

Hi, sir. Congratulations on the results, sir.

Thank you.

So wanted to know about the CAPEX plan, sir, like you have already allocated more than Rs.1,000 crores in CAPEX, sir, with 50% already spent. So can you break down the remaining allocation and what will be the expected ROI for the same, sir?

Yes, I think when it comes to the remaining part, our t hree pending CAPEX that we have on hand, one is phase -III of our injectable plant, which internally we call as COL2. This would be close to around Rs.283 crores, but around Rs.80 to Rs.100 crores is already spent on that one. Our oncology API facility also is likely to incur around Rs. 85 to Rs. 90 crores. And then our OS D with a design drawing and very early stage civil. So we need to work out what will be the CAPEX outlay for this, but we expect this to be around the Rs. 150 crore s region. ROI, look, when it comes to pharmaceuticals, I think it is very difficult to put a figure on it , because these are all going to be multi-product facilities and the market is very, very dynamic. So we cannot really give you a specific number, right? If it was an API plant that did only about three or four different products, then you will have a little bit more stability in terms of pricing, output, capacities, et c., But I think ROI is something that not just us, I think most companies will get to know that only as and when it happens.

Understood, sir. S ir, about your CAPEX programs, which are ongoing, your API facility in Vizag was gaining a lot of attraction, sir. So apart from that your oncology and injectables CAPEX are also underlying, sir. So only on the oncology part, I wanted clarification, sir, like how will it contribute to your bottom line strengthening? Like oncology is very much developing market space in India also, sir. We see a lot of new players coming up in this department. So what will be Capl in's contribution to that, sir?

Our strategy is actually to have a mix of various products. Rather than putting all our eggs in one basket, we will have actually different buckets that will add volume and value actually in one basket. Today, we are into the specialty injectables and generic injectables. Oncology, what we are doing is 15 to 16 products actually, they are working on that. Whatever mistakes we have done in the US market in the initial days, we will not do it here. Rather than filing one or two products, we w ould like to file actually at least five, six products at a time so that it becomes easy for us to generate some revenue. And coming to the R oW market also, as you mentioned, once we complete actually registration in the R oW market, there are also opportunities for supplying these oncology products to the government. But this may not be very fast. I do agree with you. These are things which, of course, is selective. Although the disease is on the rise, this product cannot be sold like any other generic. But we have opportunity. We know markets where we will be in a position to sell. We are waiting for that to happen.

Thank you, sir. In the past, we have seen you delivering on your promises, sir. So, we expect you to take care of your shareholders this time also, sir. Thank you, sir and all the best.

Thank you. Thank you very much.

The next question is from the line of Avnish Barman from Vaikarya. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi! Thanks for taking my question. My question is again on the oncology part. I mean, sir, your plans are getting commercialized in FY26. I just wanted some color on the profitability front on the oncology side. When this business scales up a little bit, does it improve your overall margins of 33%- 34% or is it expected to be a little lower than that?

Initially, we do not want to tell you that we will be in a position to make huge money. In fact, this is something which happens. Sometimes it happens like last year in one of the markets. We never expected we would get that kind of orders. We made it and we made good profits. And we are working on actually in a different market, not in the same market. There are people who also supply at lower prices to the tenders and reasons best known to you also, because tender is one thing where the government decide. And some of the governments, they think of the quality, some governments, they think of only the price. And the bigger geographies as we enter into markets like Chile, which we already told you, when it comes to supplying to these tender markets, these are the straightforward countries, there is an opportunity, we will do well, but again, it takes time. Then markets like Costa Rica, although the markets are small, they want us actually to sell in Europe or US. After that only, they will allow you to enter into the tender. Coming to Mexico, we in fact registered three or four products through our associates from China. And we are trying to register many products through our associates in China, then change those registration to our own facility in India. So we have certain models that is going to help the company. When and how actually is too early for us to tell you now.

Okay. Understood. Sir, if you can give me some idea of the timelines between, let us say you file a product today, on an average, how much time does it take to, one, get the approval and two, basically to ramp up to the potential of that product?

Yes, it depends from country-to-country. See, if you look at actually, see, those days when we went to the Central America, the fees was lower and we used to get the registration in three to four month’s time. The same Central America, it takes one year. It is not a regulated market. The regulated market, it takes 15 to 18 months. That is the most important one. And once you are registered, then the most important is actually you need to have at least 40, 50 products to open up actually your own warehouses in the form of stock and s ell. And then if you have that kind of a product, then the bundling, like most of the big companies that they do in US, you may not make money in 10, 12 products, but what they will do is if they have actually 100 products, they will try and make money actually in some 80, 90 products and bundle it. The product that they do not make money also get bundled and supplied to the cust omer. The same we do it actually in Latin America to Central America. We have registrations to the tune of 400, 500 products, of which 20% will give us the 80% of the revenue. However, the customer who comes here, he may buy one or two products very rarely. He still prefers that product also to be there so that he does not have to go to another warehouse to buy the product. So these are the things which really contribute to the business. So, we want this type of situation, the situation in such a way that we have accumulated the registration in the current business. Same things will happen in the bigger geography. So what we are doing is we are also buying products rather than acquiring the facility, we are acquiring products , that will also add actually some value to the kitty. We are sure we will do it. That is the reason I said. In the next two years, we may not be in a position to tell you like we will do extremely well, but two to three years after, yes, we will do extremely well. That is for sure.

So sir, let us say 15, 18 months in a regulated market to get the approval and then how much time to basically reach like ramp up that product?

Typically when it comes to the US, it takes us around three to four months for us to launch the product. In Latin America, we actually do it in slightly quicker time as well, because when it comes to US, most of the time, the bottleneck seems to be in the API side, because especially injectable products that we deal with, where the API is on a campaign basis, and it is not in tons and tons, right? So they have typically shorter campaign run. So that planning to be very, very carefully done . But you can assume anywhere between 90 to 120 days for the product to hit the market after registration.

Okay, understood. Thank you so much.

Thank you very much.

The next question is from the line of Vaishnavi Gurung from Craving Alpha Wealth Fund. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, sir. Thank you for taking my questions. I just have two questions. The first one was regarding the market share in Latin America. If you can give us that in terms of numbers, please?

Yes, our products do not figure in the IMS, except in one country, Guatemala , where we are next to the multinationals , because that is where this is a country where the population is only 17 to 18 million. But we do a business of $50 million there. The rest of the countries, the profitability is good and the business is good, but the population is hardly 6 to 7 million or 9 million. Here, we do not do anything in the form of actually IMS or other this thing because they do not do anything in this country. So to give you something in the form of percentage of market share is very difficult in all other geographies , except Guatemala.

Understood. Thank you, sir. Sir, my second question was regarding the plans to increase outsourcing from China. Currently, our outsourcing, if I am not wrong, is around 30%. So what is our plan to extend it or to increase it by the next two years? And if so, what impacts are we going to see on the margin side?

Yes. The idea of outsourcing now is not to increase the top line. It is mainly to add value to the bottom line. So what we will do, it may be 10% or 5% or 15%, which may happen actually over a period of time. Whatever we outsource, that will add value. For example, recently in one product, which of course, there are not many manufacturers in the country, whether it is in India or China, in fact, we were able to locate it from one corner of China and they supplied the product and our customers are happy, we also made money and the country also, the government also are very happy because we were able to identify that product. So , we are going for products which are always in scarcity and we are going for some of them like blood products, some of them are actually biosimilar, some of them are actually products which have just come out of the paten t. So these are the things which will add value to our company. That is for sure.

So sir, in terms of numbers, so in the next two years , FY2030, what can we expect the outsourcing numbers to be to China?

It will continue to be on the rise because outsourcing from China will increase compared to the outsourcing from India. Because the difference between India and China outsourcing is there is one company called CSPC in China, i t is considered as number one or number two in the country. We have been doing outsourcing with them for the last 18, 20 years. But whereas in India, the bigger companies go for outsourcing to the smaller companies. That is not the case with China. China, they only look at actually how much is the profit I get out of this business ? Is there any consistency? Initially, they may not give you exclus ivity. And if the people are known to you, they give you exclusivity. Then when you go for different kind of models, which I told you in the course of my actual speech, in the form of like 50 -50 partnership, they will take care of the R&D and manufacturing, we will take care of the regulatory and marketing, then the profits will be high and it will be also consistent.

Understood. Thank you, sir.

Thank you very much.

We will take that as our last question for today. I now hand the conference over to the management for closing comments.

Thanks to Dolat Capital for hosting the call. Thanks to all the participants that took time out to attend the earnings call and we hope to stay in touch with you in the future also. Thank you so much.

Thank you. Thank you very much to all of you.

On behalf of Dola t Capital Market Private Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us and you may now disconnect your lines.