Congratulations for a good set of numbers. Just a couple of questions from my side. The first one is regarding your recent strategic investment. So, while Brahmani River pellet makes sense around 50%, but just wanted to understand the rationale for acquisi tion of 19.4% stake in MRPPL. What is the rationale behind it? It doesn't give us any control over material or a meaningful stake as well. So if you could explain the rationale behind it? And whether the recent pellet strategic investments signify that we are going to be a meaningful p layer in the pellet market or later on as our steel capacities develop, these can be back-ended to supply our steel plants?

Could you repeat the second part of the question? I couldn't understand it.

Yes. The second part of the question is that what is the final -- what you're looking at basically after the acquisition, whether you want to be a meaningful player in the external pellet market or this pellet investment, essentially these pellet plant will feed into your own steel plant?

So let me answer the first question -- the second question first. With 25 million ton s of regular mining and sellable -- 26 million ton s of regular mining and around 5 million ton s of steel production, we'll always have a 16 million ton roughly excess pellet/iron ore. And that if it is marketed in a blended way, it will always be the right strategy, number one. Number two, so we would always be having pellet output as a long-term strategy. Number two is also that the BRPL asset would mostly be using iron ore from that area itself and marketing the iron ore also -- the pellet also in that area itself. So, there ar e also talks with the long -term consumers utilizing the pipeline and the pellet asset there. Number three, regarding the Goa, like you are aware, we had a foot in the door earlier by having a conversion contract. We are selling them iron ore, and that continues there. So the asset purchase, if you might have noticed, is at a very, very low valuati on, mostly at a book value, basically because it's a long-term thought process to have a foot in the door in the Western Coast as well, especially when we look at the export market from there. Right now, export is unviable with $6, $7 premium over iron ore. Once that will change over a period, then that asset will be more viable. And answering your last -- first question, why only 19.5% or whatever is what was available for us.

Okay. Got it. Got it. The second one is essentially in your prepared remarks, you mentioned that the company might be looking for some other mining investments maybe overseas. So if it is not too early, is it possible to give -- drop a head that what could be -- whether we would be...

It is too early. Even internally, it is too early. We have been scouting, like I said, across metals and across geographies. It is too early to commit anything on that.

Okay. So if I just squeeze in one more, and that is an offshoot from the last question. What kind of profitability we are looking at pellet considering that our iron ore is of higher grade with low silica alumina content? So, what kind of profitability you are working with? I mean, preferably there will be some good buyers for it in export market as well?

Right now, our sales is totally in the Indian market. We have produced around 2.5 lakh ton s, 3 lakh tons till now in the last 40 days. And we are sold out till mid -September or so, mostly in the Indian market. The profitability is around -- extra from iron ore of around INR 1,500 to INR1,800 per ton on an EBITDA basis. The advantage to that pellet plant is also the pipeline. So, we save on the iron ore transportation as well.

Our next question is from the line of Vikash Singh from ICICI Securities.

Sir, my first question pertains to our guidance of 22 million tons of iron ore mining. We did 3.5 million and currently monsoon is going. So, our asking rate for the second half could be anywhere between 7 million to 8 million ton s per quarter, assuming some impact for the monsoon in 2Q. So, just wanted to understand how confident we are on this? And what is the evacuation plan on -- because evacuating 8 million to 9 million tons in the last quarter would be difficult, right?

Right. So having completed the 2 quarters, let's say, around 8 million tons -- 7.5 million to 8 million tons, we'll be left with around 14 million tons in the 2 quarters. Out of the 2 million tons will be evacuated -- 2.5 million tons will be evacuated by pipeline to the Konsari plant. We hope to sell some concentrate from there as well. And balance is around 12 million tons, 11.5 million to 12 million tons, which leaves around 45,000 to 50,000 ton s a day of transportation by truck to customers as well as by truck to the railway sidings. We have got 3 railway sidings fully operational with full-fledged stockyards near the railway siding. We have the truck and the full network available to be able to do that. We have been doing on good weather days up to 60,000 ton s per day on a stretch of 3, 4 days. So right now, it's possible. We haven't achieved that quarterly figure, but daily, weekly figures have been achieved beyond this limit.

Noted, sir. Sir, my second question again pertains to your 2 strategic investments. Just wanted to understand, is there any clause already there, which allows us to buy the remaining stake or for the time being, it is just the minority stake which we are picking up?

I couldn't understand the question.

So in this 2 strategic investments basically, the MRPPL and BRPL, is there any clause which allows us to take further stake in these companies at a later stage achieving certain milestone? Or this is the only transaction, which we are doing and there is no plans for further increasing the stake in this company?

Yes. See, currently, we weren't looking -- we were trying to get in more and more whatever we could achieve, but we could achieve only 49%. The balance 50% remains with our partner, that is TEMPL only. So it's more or less in the same group. Yes, if there is a requirement of taking over that, we will be able to do that.

And just, sir, what about Mandovi?

Regarding Mandovi because 19.4%, that too in Goa where there is a low grade availability and you are predominantly dependent on export market to be good, while there's a lot of news coming that the Chinese capacity might get cut. So the low versus high- grade premiums m ight also shrink going forward. So, I still didn't get the rationale why you gone to that geography? Because you are already creating a good pellet capacity by yourselves, sir. There was no basically exact reason for us to go for a small plant like that.

The Mandovi asset have been purchased at book value, at their procurement value. And so that is a very low price asset. We are supplying them iron ore. And it's a strategic investment. I mean, it's an investment not -- you will not get involved in the operations apart from what we are right now doing. The pellets if exported will be through us, like we have been doing earlier. So that would continue. It's an additional partnership with the promoters there. They would not be interested in selling more, like I mentioned earlier. And at the moment, we are very, very going to continue on the same basis.

Yes, sir. So exactly, that is why my concern was since we don't have control and we are -- ourselves is a very dominant player in that space, what was the need to just go and buy minority stake? Because I don't think that this would contribute significantly into our financials as well.

It does not contribute to our financials. It's a INR16.5 crores investment by a company, which is worth INR85,000 crores. And we believe that it's an investment which will pay in the long run, which strategically, we have now a foot in all the 2 -- both the coasts and the central part of the country. That is a very strategic decision. We have -- I mean, there's nothing else I can really say on this. INR16.5 crores is the investment. There's no management stake.

The marketing contract continues, what we are still doing. The export is through us only. We'll be doing that. We'll continue doing that.

Our next question is from the line of Parthiv Jhonsa from Anand Rathi.

Sir, my first question pertains to the entire cost optimization. Considering our per ton EBITDA has been better compared to the hike in ASP or realization, is it fair to assume that we have started getting some benefit from Thriveni already and this will continue going forward? Further, you have mentioned on one of the slides, if I'm not mistaken, Slide 19, that once 85- kilometer completely wraps up the slurry pipeline, you would have about INR 500 to INR 600 per ton kind of a cost saving and captive logistics would be about INR100 to INR150 per ton. So is it fair to assume that this about INR 2,200 EBITDA per ton can easily be close to about INR2,700, INR2,800 in next 2 quarters?

The benefit of Thriveni would come in automatically with the consolidated figures. The slurry pipeline advantage for 10 million ton s out of 26 million ton s will be there. So therefore, the advantage would be INR500 into 10 by '26. So, that will be a little lesser. I hope that answers the question.

Yes, no. So just wanted to understand, does this INR2,200 EBITDA per ton include anything or does it -- has it started including anything from the Thriveni benefit or it will completely accrue in Q2?

See, the Thriveni benefit will start coming in only in the next quarter, the running quarter because consolidation, it will be -- the consolidated numbers will show you that. Till now, it wasn't there. It was just an effect of the slurry pipeline, which we just commissioned for almost an end part of the last month of the quarter and the realization as well as the work what we have been doing on the cost front. So, all these things have helped us in improving our EBITDA.

Let me add one item on this logistics question. We have started in this quarter our logistics company, which would also be more in the Thriveni group of companies -- under Thriveni rather than directly under Lloyds. That will also...

It will be a step down subsidiary.

Step down subsidiary. And that will also add 2 things to the cost saving exercise. One is reduction of costs by having internal control. Number two, the profitability of that company would remain within the group -- within the company. And number three, the early gentlemen, Vikash mentioned about the evacuation that is also supported by that company. And number four, of course, is also the greening of the whole exercise. So, logistics is a very, very serious aspect of us, and we are looking at all aspects to make sure that logistics are green, are saving money and are efficiently evacuating the product.

Sure. That is quite helpful, sir. Sir, my second question is pertaining to the MRPPL 19.4% strategic stake. Right now, I believe it's about 2 million ton kind of a capacity. Just because you are supplying a high- quality ore to them apparently, is there a possibility for them to hike this 2% to, say, 4%, 5% if the export opportunity or the domestic opportunity in that belt increases? Is there a good opportunity to increase the capacity there? Any idea on that?

I believe that the company would be looking at beneficiation assets in that Goa because there are a lot of dumps that are being auctioned. And there is a beneficiation plant available with the Chowgule's, erstwhile owner of this company. So the strategy is to use that more, beneficiate it in the Chowgule plant and bring it to this pellet plant and mix it with our -- blend it with our ore and get a very acceptable quality of pellet for the domestic market.

And sir, if I may just squeeze in a quick one. You have given guidance till '27. Just wanted to understand by '28, your BHQ 15 million tons would come on stream, that would give about close to about 5 million ton s of equivalent ore, right? So is that fair to understand that your iron ore production would drop down from '25, '26 guidance to, say, 20 number and your BHQ would be 15 million? Is that understanding correct?

We are accelerating our BHQ program from input of 15 million ton s in the first phase to -- 30 million tons in the first phase. So, that will give us 10 million ton s output and the DSO sales would come down by same amount. So, we'll be able to execute the 26 million tons that is allowed under the EC for the life of the mine.

Got it. So 16 plus 10, correct?

16 plus 10. Yes.

Our next question is from the line of Siddharth Gadekar from Equirus.

Sir, first on the operational performance, can you give a split between the fines and the lumps this quarter in terms of volume and the realization?

It was around 11% of lumps and balance was fines.

And realization for both?

The realization was INR6,500 for the lumps and around INR 5,900 for the fines.

Sir, secondly, for this quarter, how are we looking at the realization?

The markets have -- I think if I look at the average price, it will be a little INR 200 more at the moment, our current market price, and we see that it will continue. Nobody can really predict the iron ore pricing. But given the fact that steel demand growth is 8%, 9%, production is similar 9% and iron ore is up by 8%. We see the continuous gap increasing and also seeing it in the market by seeing that there is lesser exports, a little more imports of iron ore and some pellets coming. So with all that, we think that the market would be quite strong for iron ore.

Okay. Sir, secondly, in terms of our volumes for 2x, where we are guiding for around 14 million tons in the second half, sir, have we already started negotiations with the customers to actually supply the entire volume?

Yes, we have. Our largest two customers have been getting 31%, 35% from us that would continue on the same ratio, and that has been negotiated on some index basis. The other products are internally, like you said, pellet. Pellet is going to a brand-new geography because earlier, we didn't have enough lumps. So the pellets is going to the southern geography where there's a good demand. So, that is actually taking away 2 million ton s going forward, 2.5 million tons of our pellet of our iron ore away from the market, away from our sales liability and going to a brand- new market. I see pellet and lump as competing with each other. So, that's why we are very careful of that. The rest of the market basically grows in the same ratio, and we are very, very confident of able to evacuate the material and sell the material at similar margins, if not better than the last quarter.

Lastly, on our wire rod capacity also, we have started any discussions with customers? Any primary market that we would be targeting for wire rod?

We are -- this is the first plant in our area in the Western region in the Maharashtra region. We have a very clear cut marketing strategy tied up. Number one is that we are doing 3 service centers in 3 different areas. One is very near the plant. One would be near Hyderabad again and one would be near Bombay, Pune. So with these 3 service centers, we'll be able to sell a large quantity of TMT, even though it is wire rod, we would sell it in coil form and the service centers would be able to sell TMT. The wire rod itself, we are talking to some wire rod manufacturers as well as to LRPC manufacturers to be able to get into that field, especially LRPC is growing at the rate of around 25% -- 20%, 25%, and we want to partake in that. It will be very, very partnership -oriented marketing for that product. Thirdly is that we have 3 products that we'll be selling from our mill. One is wire rod, which is around 700,000 to 800,000 ton s. TMT, both in wire rod form and in straight form, around 300,000 tons. And alloy steel bars, carbon steel bars, which will be around 200,000, 300,000 tons. So, we have a whole range, very, very flexible thought process in our marketing and in our product mix as well as the mill configuration.

Got it. Sir, lastly, on the capex for this year, how should we think about the capex, including the acquisitions that we are doing?

See, for the acquisition, we have that cash flows are built in within the company internal approvals, plus some shares is what we have to be doing. So it will be an issue of new shares. And the balance capex, what we are already there in our pipeline, that is all the thing we've done around INR1,300 crores to INR1,400 crores in the first quarter. And going ahead, we should be on an average doing over the next 3 years at around INR 7,500 crores to INR8,000 crores. And plus, we have the 65% of the warrants, which is pending. So, around INR1,770 crores is pending on that. We should be getting that.

Our next question is from the line of Bhavin Chheda from ENAM Holdings.

Sir, congratulations on overall good set of numbers and getting EC raised to 26 million ton s. Overall, good...

Sorry to interrupt. Bhavin sir, your voice is a bit low.

Can you hear me now?

Yes.

Per year.

For the projects, which are already going on?

Per year, yes. That would be per year.

Okay. So for the projects, which are already going on for expansion of steel and pellets, so we are pending -- it would get over in INR24,000-odd crores.

Correct.

Right. And this includes a greenfield 4 million pellet capex also to Ghugus, which is there in the presentation right now?

Yes.

And the new slurry pipeline.

Yes, sir. Yes.

Okay. Second question, I just missed out on the 14 million evacuation plan for second half you had mentioned. I just missed out 2, 3 points there. Can you repeat that, sir?

Okay. Around 2.5 million tons would be evacuated by the pipeline, leaving around 11.5 million tons. If you divide that by 180 days, it leaves around 50,000 ton s per day. We have been doing 60,000 tons regularly on dry days in the rainy season as well after the EC. And we are very confident that we can complete the 22 million tons that is the capacity allowed by the EC in this financial year.

Right. And the last question on BHQ grade, the capex, what we are doing, as you said. Now, Phase 1, you are doing 30 million tons at one go. And how would it be commissioned in phases?

So the 30 million tons would be 6 trains.

6 trains?

There were 3 modules of 3 trains each, so 9 modules. The 3 modules are 3 trains each. So, there are 9 trains. We'll be commissioning -- we are doing -- going ahead with 6 trains in the first phase.

Will give you a total of?

Each train would be commissioned, say, let's say, every month, every 15 days or 1 month, 2 months. But the overall infrastructure will be ready for the 30 million tons input and 10 million tons output.

Okay. And the first train should be next year?

Okay. By March '27 or so, or Jan '27 basically.

Yes. December '27.

FY '26 -- FY' 27.

FY' 27, yes. Sorry.

Our next question is from the line of Vinit Thakur from Plus91 AMC.

I had a couple of questions. Could you tell me about what our IPS benefit will come on stream? Is it from this year or next year?

The IPS paperwork has started. We will be able to credit the IPs for the pellets in this year itself.

And sir, how much are we expecting?

I don't have the figures on hand. But essentially, the pellet plant divided by 12, and also the DRI plant when it gets commissioned.

Okay, sir. And sir, I had one operational question. Sir, we completed our pellet plant in 18 months, whereas industry size is around 3 to 4 years. What gives us the moat to complete the plant in such a fast pace?

One of the reasons is focus, focus, focus. Number two is we have got our own internal company. When I say internal meaning Lloyds Engineering and their associate, LICL, which has hired all the equipment, not -- which owns all the equipment for the pipeline as well as the erection. Many of the employees, the workers are employed by this company. So it's essentially like a full-fledged construction company itself. We are depending on ourselves rather than anywhere else in the outside. And number three is the total support from the local authorities as well as equipment suppliers because all that is very important. Number four is continuous cash flow is going without any hiccups. So, all these things add to this execution strategy, which will continue in all our projects.

Our next question is from the line of Divy Agrawal from Ficom Family Office.

Congratulations on the great set of numbers. Sir, firstly, in Q1, our total production was around 4 million tons. And in Q2 due to monsoon, it is expected to be around 2 million tons. So, we are left with around about 16 million ton s, which translates to around 2.7 million ton s per month. So, my question is, do we have the capability and the resources or the machineries to produce 2.7 million tons per month?

Actually, it is 4 million tons in this quarter as well. And this question has been answered earlier, including the pipeline and the fact that we have done 50,000 to 60,000 ton s on a single week -- on a daily basis on a single week, we are very, very confident that we can evacuate the full 22 million tons that is required under the EC in this financial year.

Sure, sir. That was helpful. And second, sir, I just wanted to know about the price hike. So, were there any price hikes in this quarter? Or do we expect any price hikes in coming quarters as well?

There has been a price hike around 15 days back when the quarter started. And like I said earlier, I cannot predict what the price hike would be like. The market has a supply- demand issue for iron ore. And so we are hoping to succeed in that way.

Just if I can squeeze in one. So what are the margins for Thriveni Pellets and MRPPL? And what kind of synergies do we expect from these acquisitions that Lloyds would incur?

Thriveni Pellets, like I mentioned earlier, is looking at -- not Thriveni, BRPL is looking at a long-term agreement where at one end, the mine is available with one company. And at the other end, there is a steel plant. So, we are looking at that conversion type of agreement. We can make it consistently INR600 to INR800 margin well within the investment area that we have. And MRPPL is a little more troublesome, and that's why we have only 18% to 19% stake in that -- 19%, 20% stake in that.

Our next question is from the line of Harsh Shah from Seven Rivers Holding.

Sir, first question is that we are envisaging investment of around INR600 crores in Dubai. So if you can elaborate about the time line and what kind of opportunities are we foreseeing there?

We were just -- as Rajesh ji has also mentioned, we are looking into other geographies and other minerals and all those stuff, what we are looking in for expanding. So, this is just a preparation for that. We can -- we incorporate a company. And if any opportunity is available, then we can go through it on a quicker note. That's why this company is happening.

Okay. And sir, we have raised...

Nothing specific at the moment. Yes.

Sorry. Can you come again?

Nothing specific at the moment.

Okay. Okay. And sir, we have raised -- we are raising INR2,500 crores through debentures. And last year, we had taken enabling resolution. We expect the remaining part of INR 2,500 crores also to come in sometime in the current year?

See, we're not looking in for any further dilution as such. This is the NCD what we felt should be more than enough for taking care of all our projects, any -- the volatility associated with the industry. So, we're just going in for INR 2,500 crores. So as of today, it is only this much. If anything comes up, we'll be letting you all know.

Yes. So sir, I have two questions. First is like we are projecting our top line to be somewhere around INR40,000 crores in a matter of 4, 5 years down the line. So coming on to our backward integration, that is slurry pipelines and the acquisition of Thriveni. And today, as of now, our EBITDA margins were like somewhere around 33% in the quarter. So, do we exp ect the operating margins to be somewhere north of around 40 percentage in next 4, 5 years?

No, I think the steel margins would normally be much lesser. I don't have the figures off-hand.

The cost saving -- with all the cost saving steps what we are taking, we are trying to achieve, if not beyond 40%, we'd like to close to 40%.

Close to 40%.

And we will compound these figures more properly as the industry is progressing as our macro improves.

Yes, sir. And sir, second is like this -- on the pellet pricing, so are we planning to supply pellets towards Raipur market as well? I mean from the industry sources, there is a lot of DRI capacity that is coming over there. So, do we have any plans to supply pe llets over there? Or we will be looking for a different location for supplying pellet in the market?

We have already started our pellet output, mostly in the south part of the country because there was a bigger supply-demand gaps there and a lot of DRI units are there also. We do not exclude Raipur from our thought process. At the moment, that margin is a little more crowded, and we look at geographies which give us the best realization without disrupting the overall market.

Yes, sir. And sir, like coming on to our -- the overall production and the pipeline that we are having, so are we optimistic on the steel pricing like overall market outlook? I mean, iron ore is pretty stable. So coming on to pellet, like do we expect pell et to be stable somewhere around INR9,000 to INR10,000 per ton?

Right now ex-factory are around INR 8,700, INR8,500. And we see that moving with the iron ore market going forward. I think the worst of the pellet industry -- the pellet industry as well as the smaller steel players suffer a lot in the rainy season. So, I think in the next 9 months, we foresee a very steady demand for pellets and pricing should reflect based on iron ore and iron ore pricing, like I mentioned earlier, cannot be predicted by anybody.

And sir, our top line guidance of INR40,000 crores remains intact for next 4 years?

We have given such a guidance? I don't think so.

In the May '24, 1, in the last con call.

4.2 million ton s steel plant itself gives you INR 25,000 crores and 10 million ton s of iron ore gives you the balance. So, that's where that INR40,000 crores top line comes from. Yes, it does – if the projects are all online.

I just have a follow-up question on the iron ore production. Like we are guiding for 22 million tons in FY '26. So correct me if I'm wrong. Like 4 million ton s is going for pellet plant, 0.5 million tons will be going for DRI. So, we are left with around 17.5 million ton s over the -- for the open market side, right?

A little more because it's not 4 million tons, it's annualized 4 million tons. It's around 2.5 million tons for the pellet and around 800,000 tons for the DRI.

For the DRI?

800,000 tons. So, we are left with 3.3 million tons, which is around 18 million tons.

And we are not seeing any issue on the demand side like absorption side over there?

No, I'm not seeing that at all.

Okay. Okay. And sir, one more question, like over the DRI part, just wanted to know like how do we see going forward because we have seen realization have come down despite of volume going up. So, can you just comment over like how do you see it?

So, DRI and the steel sector is undergoing its annual problem of the rainy season. Unfortunately, it started a little before that because of the international problems of China. Now, I'm seeing the DRI is still under pressure and margins are still under pressure, still positive over and above iron ore price or pellet price for that matter, but under pressure. Margins will remain under pressure for the next 6 to 8 months, I see. And yes, pellet is more stable and demands are better. The demand of steel has gone up by 8% over the last 2 years, 3 years. It was a little more in the 2 years back, and now this year is around 8%, 9%, which is still a very, very strong demand. The problem is that the supplies are even stronger. The supply gr owth is even stronger, and it will take some time to stabilize till the steel market stabilizes. DRI is a factor of the steel market.

Our next follow-up question is from the line of Vinit Thakur from Plus91 AMC.

One more question I had is since we have moved towards 100% green mining, are there any plans to venture into green steel as well?

Definition of green steel is not fully understood by me. The taxonomy revised by the government of India, our steel plant would be in the 5-star rating.

Our next follow-up question is from the line of Parthiv Jhonsa from Anand Rathi.

Sir, my first question is pertaining to the couple of coal blocks, which were auctioned in the nearby vicinity. I believe those blocks are not yet operational. So, any chances those would come out for reauction and you would be able to participate in that because they're in very close vicinity to the existing mine?

Ore. Iron ore.

Iron ore. There were six blocks, which were auctioned in the past. I have no exact status of what is the exact status of that. Those were exploratory consolidated blocks. I have no idea what is the status of those blocks.

Okay, sir. Sir, my last question is pertaining to the capex . I believe you said that your yearly capex for next 3 years is about INR7,500 crores to INR8,000 crores. Just wanted to know, in the near term, you're going to see some amount from the warrants. And I just wanted to check like would we be open to take debt just to fund these capex or it will completely be from internal accruals?

So, we have taken some debt.

We have taken some debt in the last year also, this year also. Wherever we feel there is a shortage or wherever we feel there would be a stress is when we are planning and going ahead with that. Now, we've taken an NCD approval of INR2,500 crores. This is something, which we are looking at over the next 3 years, which should give me a buffer. It could be a long- term type of a thing is what we are targeting at. And it should be a buffer, which should be taking care of all our debt requirements till t he time of capex what we have announced.

Our next question is from the line of Amay Sharda from Purnartha Investment Advisors.

So, I just had a question on Thriveni Earthmovers Limited. So, I just wanted to understand whether we'll be using this company for our captive purposes? Or will it also have its own outside business?

It already has outside contracts. They are operating in -- we are operating in Odisha for iron ore around 14 mines, in Jharkhand with the NTPC mines, in Indonesia, in Andhra in 2 mines, 1 mine in Barite. So, we are already doing that. We continue to do that, and we'll also continue to look at other MDO opportunities and any international assets as well. If we go into that, the asset will be owned by Lloyds Metal and the MDO would be done by Thriveni. So, we have the double engine growth for future projects is what we are planning.

So sir, like what kind of margins does the company earn on these contracts? And what kind of revenue expectations do we have from this company for the rest of the year?

Roughly, the revenue currently is around -- last quarter was around INR7,500 crores.

Okay. And the margin, sir?

One minute, sorry. INR750 crores. The difference between millions and crores, I got confused. Sorry. EBITDA is around 33% of that. Going forward, the tonnage of Lloyds Metals would be added in this year for sure, which would take it up from INR 750 crores per quarter to around INR1,100 crores per quarter going forward.

Okay. So before this, we were not a client of Thriveni Earthmovers?

We were the clients of Thriveni Earthmovers. We were also the -- yes, we were the -- not this particular company. This is a break -off from the original company. That structure is explained in our previous presentations as well.

Our next question is from the line of Prateek Singh from DAM Capital Advisors.

Just a last bookkeeping question and following up from the earlier question. So, earlier when we had announced acquiring 80% in Thriveni, so we had given projections for the next few years basis, existing business operations. So, are we at a point where we can give a new estimate if we have won any new order wins? Or should we still assume the same numbers given earlier?

Since the last quarter, they have not won any new contracts. They are all busy in consolidating these 2 companies and getting the right mix of people. And the integration of 2 big companies is always not an easy job. So, we are all busy there. That integration process is well underway, and we are very happy with the way the integration is going and...

We are looking for new opportunities.

And new opportunities are being looked at.

Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question for today. I now hand the conference over to the management for closing comments. Over to you, sir.

Thank you, everybody. Hope we have replied to all your questions, all your queries. If anything else remains pending, you can always get in touch with us. Mr. Chintan Mehta, he is the Investor Relations Officer. You can always get in touch with them, and he'll be providing with you all the replies. Thank you.

Thank you. On behalf of DAM Capital Advisors, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines.