The first question is from the line of Gao zhixuan , Schonfeld Please go ahead.

Yes. thank you so much for the opportunity. The first question is on the gold AUM growth . I just want to understand, if we look at the gold customers, that's about 1% increase quarter -on- quarter. So the AUM growth is very good at 23%. So how should we think about how much of that is gold price driven? And how should we think about the gold AUM growth when the gold price starts moving up going forward?

The ticket size during the quarter, we have seen an increase, especially our strategy with a lower yield for a high-ticket customers. So the AUM growth is almost 22%, but the growth in number of customers is not that much because of our strategy by shifting to higher ticket borrowers.

And if I would just add to what Bindu has stated, I mean, I think we must take into cognizance 2, 3 other facts also which come into play in the gold loan business. There is something called customer prudence also which comes into play because these are th e jewels of the family and which are very auspicious in our country, right? If you look at the LTVs, both weighted average and simple average LTVs of our portfolio, they remain the same prior to gold price increase and now. They all hover between 57% and 60%. So it's not that because the gold price is going up, our LTVs are going up. But to your question, do you see significant risk? Now let's say, the price of gold falls significantly, then we have got a short temporary period of time, yes, there could be a small correction that we had, but that is always temporary. It has never been beyond at the most 3, 4 months and 2, 3 months at the most. So we are not -- we don't get too concerned about that. I must say also, let me say, worst -case scenario, gold price comes down also. I would say that our company is very strongly poised to be able to manage the situation because we have an advantage in our online gold loan portfolio. The online gold loan app, which most of our customers transact on, it's very easy for them to repay and make sure that LTV, regulatory LTVs are met. And they don't have to -- and our customers don't have to keep rushing to branches, which a lot of our comp etitors will have to do. So I think we are fairly strongly poised. You know, even if there is a correction, it seems unlikely today, but you never know because the price has gone up, it shouldn't really be too much of a worry to us other than, as I said, 1, 2 months. We should be fine. Another thing I must state is gold loan as an asset class has got fully established in India today. Over the last 1-year, it is the largest retail asset lending class in India. So gold loan is today a great product, not just for negative times in the economy, where normally in negative times in the economy is when the price of gold goes up. It's a great product for negative economic times. It's a great product even for normal economic times because customers are saying it's a fabulous product for them to take. It's easy to avail. The repayment obligations are in their control how the product is structured. So -- and that's how we've already established as the largest retail lending class over the last 1 -year. So largely on gold, I think we have a good story in the country.

Yes. That's very clear. Thanks so much. And just on the yield perspective, how you think about the gold yield going forward? Should it go down further to 18% as we talked about earlier? Or how should we think about that?

Yes. The yield will be similar to whatever is the yield in the market, which is being judged by leading gold loan players, we will be with that. We are already in that range. So we continue to be with the market. We were, I mean, to answer -- Yes, please go ahead.

So it's 18.3% in terms of gold yield already in line with the market or your segment or because we are also on a shift to larger ticket size customer, right? So I just want to understand 1, 2 quarters down the road, how should we think about the gold yield?

This is similar to the other leading players in the market. So we'll be maintaining, as I told, we'll be maintaining more or less the same rate as other leading players. So they also have these larger tickets. So the average will be like that. So we don't expect much change.

Got it. Sorry, just one last question on the borrowings. If I'm not wrong, it seems that the borrowing has went up a lot this quarter much more than the loan growth. I just wonder, given that the Bain is expected to inject capital, why do we need to take so much borrowing this quarter?

So, Bain approval is in the final stages with RB I. So we got some interim approval, but -- we have -- Bain has sought some clarifications in that regard, etcetera, etcetera. So -- and they have made some submissions also. That's why the final approval is yet to come through. So we expect the final approval to come through without much delay. Maybe we expect that to happen within another 1 month.

Got it. Thank you so much. I will join back in the queue. Thank you.

Yes, hi, team. Congrats on the quarter. Just a couple of things on the opening comments. So Mr. Reddy, when you said that you all are conducting like price sensitivity tests to improve the scheme mix, can you just elaborate on what you mean by that?

Yes. So in the past, we used to be -- we have taken a strategy of pricing at the upper end of the market. Now over this year, we realized that we had to, as our Chairman said, we benchmark with competition, which is what we have done. And we are running va rious tests and that's a constant process, but we run it very closely here. In terms of geographies, customers, locations, tiers and to check what the sensitivity levels are and which is what we have been doing to fine-tune it because we move from a position of being priced higher than market to a strategic call to be priced at market.

And so does this mean that in geography one, let's say, Tamil Nadu, hypothetically, you're offering a INR50,000 loan at 19%. And in Maharashtra, you'll offer it at 18% because the crowd in Maharashtra is different. That’s the difference.

Yes. I mean, competition is definitely there . Competitive factors, density of branches, how evolved the market is in the state, all of these go into pricing decisions. Typically, the early stage was South Indian states of, let's say, Kerala and Tamil Nadu, where density of competition about branches is very high, competition levels is very high. And then you'll take different pricing strategies for different locations. right? And as I said, we are getting ready for -- we are already showing very strong growth. We are getting ready for much more significant growth. And there's a lot of tests that we're doing. But I think -- but the takeaway you can take back is from being priced above market, Manappuram, you can be expect to price at market going forward. We have shown that in the last quarter. And the results will come through. I mean you'll see leverage benefits to come through very strongly in the quarters to come.

Got it. So on a scale of 1 to 10, where are we in the journey of getting priced in line with peers? We are already at 10, is it?

I mean that's a tough question to put a number. So I don't want to put a number. But you ask me, I would say around 8 or 8.5, I would say we are almost there.

Got it. And then secondly, you also mentioned a number of initiatives like transforming the branches next year to improve the customer experience. You're working with a consultancy firm to develop the tech stack. How should we like these are obviously very good initiatives for the long term and they're important. How do we think about how opex trends in that regard in FY '27 and maybe beyond?

There will be some investments, a lot more capital investments that we are going to put in. But I don't think -- and we are in the process of making our budget for next year. I don't think you should be overly worried about that. I mean, of course, there will be some investments. But the initiatives will also result in cutting of opex where required, in optimizing of opex where required. And also leverage benefits coming in as opex as a percentage, you should see all those leverages coming in. So I don't think you need to be overly worried about that. Let's say, the new structures we're putting in, new people putting in will have to pay for themselves in much higher productivity.

Understood. And just lastly, just repeating the same question of this one earlier, and this is probably to Bindu, but like borrowing growth being higher than loan growth, is it just simply back-ended because borrowings have grown like at 28%, 29%. I'm just talking stand -alone balance sheet. So is it just like an end of period phenomenon? Or was it like just throughout the quarter? And if it was throughout the quarter, then why was it so high?

It is end of the quarter only. And if you see our liquidity position, we have almost from INR1,500 crores to INR2,000 crores to INR4,000 crores as we were getting a lot of limits at the end of the quarter.

Okay. So just the end of period phenomenon?

Yes.

The next question is from the line of Abhijit Tibrewal from Motilal.

Congratulations on a strong gold loan growth. Again, kind of circling back on the yields, our yields have actually declined from 19.7% last quarter to 18.3% this quarter. So I mean, while these are portfolio yields, what I'm trying to understand is what that essentially means is the gold loans that you would have done in this quarter would have been even lower yields, right? Basically somewhere around 17%, 17.5%. And earlier when CEO sir said that maybe on a scale of 1 to 10, we are at 8%, 8.5%. So eventually, you expect these yields to stabilize around that 17.5% mark is it?

No, we would expect the yields and the way the market is operating today, our expectation is in the range of 18%. But I mean that's where we expect it to be. Right, I mean the question is, let's say, I must say because we have a very unique and a very strong customer proposition in our online digital gold loan app, OGL app. And so that -- as a result of that, our pricing transmission between onboarding and book yield is much faster than that of competition. So I view that as a positive thing both for customers and us. So our expectation is in the range of 18 up to maybe 18.15%, depending on how things go is my expectation as such.

Got it. So essentially, that also, I'm guessing would be done by the end of this year. And then from next year onwards, we should look at stable yields there?

That's correct.

Got it. The other question I had was on this Bain transaction. I'm sure earlier in the call, Nandakumar sir commented on it saying that we received some kind of an interim approval and the final approval is expected to come through in the next 1 month. But sir, I'm just trying to understand, you remember also a media article that came out. And then we also refuted it or we clarified on that on the stock exchanges. But at least -- I mean, that problem which was highlighted in that article of RBI not being okay with Bain having a majority stake in 2 NBFCs, has that part at least been addressed with the regulator?

Yes, it is not majority stake, controlling interest. Controlling interest...

Right. I'm sorry Controlling interest in both the NBFCs.

Controlling interest. But that part of Bain is working out, something whereby this is addressed. So we are in discussion with RBI. And whatever RBI has told Bain is ready to go by that. So that will not create any problem with regard to promised investment in Manappuram as well as the joint control in Manappuram.

Got it, sir. So essentially, sir, I mean, if I understand this right, whatever the RBI suggested, Bain is happy to go ahead with that so that you can get a control in control in Manappuram?

Yes, whenever we get the information…

So one thing is very clear, Bain is interested in Manappuram.

Got it, sir. And sir, last 2questions. One is we discussed about this customer -- number of customers earlier. But today, all I'm trying to understand is when we look at gold loan NBFCs, right, this thing around number of customers not growing lot tonnage, we understand, like you've explained to all of us in the past that when gold prices go up. It is not important that the tonnage also goes up because customers are prudent and they borrow only as much as they want. So the fact that the gold loan customers are also not increasing at the industry level. And despite that, if we are seeing gold loan growth, how should we read that? Is it like more number of gold loan players coming and which is where no one is seeing a gold loan customer growth? Or is it like these are the same set of customers who are taking gold loans, just that they're taking higher ticket sizes now, which is what is driving the gold loan industry growth?

So if I can take this question. It's an interesting question. And I think I request you to view it from a perspective of growth cycle. So as I mentioned, in the past our pricing was slightly higher than that of competition. And at that time, we thought it was prudent and right thing to do. And as a result, there were some of our customers who for years were very loyal to us, some of them may have moved out of us. Now the price loan growth -- the gold loan price has been going on for almost 1 year right now. This quarter, you would have seen a significant take-up rate and catch up with our growth rates, a big uptick in happening. That's the first part of the cycle. right? Now the second part of the cycle is once the business growth comes, branches being infused, right pricing that we have in the market. Then the second cycle will now lead to much higher new customers also being acquired because the whole teams are getting galvanized. So I think what you're seeing last quarter growth of significant growth compared to our previous quarters is Step 1. Step 2, you will move into this. But we are fairly enthused at this stage.

Got it, sir. And then I just want to squeeze in one last question. While we have shared that our yields are now comparable to other prominent gold loan players and likewise, the margins and spreads are also comparable to the other gold loan players. But si r, this opex bit, right, I mean, if I look at our ROA thing right, versus the ROA thing of our peers. I think it is that opex, right, which is significantly lower for some of our peers, right? So what is it that we are doing on the opex side? Is it just scale you think which will help you bring down the opex and then translate into better ROAs going forward and better ROEs as leverage comes? Or are there also other things that you are doing -- steps that you're taking for opex rationalization?

I think the answer is in your question. It is all of it. It is both scale, which is very important, of course, but also a significant process improvement, which as a result, brings down our costs also are things that we are working on. So I mean, the answer was in your question, sir.

The next question is from the line of Rajiv Mehta from YES Securities.

Congrats on stable numbers. My first question is on the non -gold portfolios. So how deep can this asset quality NPA recognition phase go in vehicle and equipment finance, in MSME, personal loan, housing finance because we are seeing spikes in the NPAs. So when do you -- at what levels can they peak out and by when they can peak-out? And just to understand the credit cost impact incremental because of that, what is the current PCR that we are holding on the existing NPAs on each of these books? And would it be right to presume that you would want to address this in terms of provisions or recognition largely in Q4 itself? So that you can start FY '27 on a lighter note?

So on vehicle finance, if you see as the disbursement has slowdown, it is more on account of the residual impact. So the quarterly increase is only some INR40 crores in the vehicle finance book on which the provision currently we are doing ECL around 27%. So that is the provisions we are doing. But at the same time, we are doing a current valuation of the assets and any kind of shortfall we are providing and about 730 days also, we are taking 100% write-off. Similarly, for MSME, all unsecured loans, the net NPA is 0, digital personal loan or the small portion of un secured, we took 100 write-off. And on the secured portfolio as the average LTV is very low and the ECL with a 5 -year realization period is around 5%, 6%. But the asset in case of vehicle finance, comparatively easy to repossess and sell, we will see improvement. But of course, MSME will take more time and the customers are servicing the EMI with delay.

Okay. And in Asirvad, can you share the bucket collection trends? And if I were to look at your Stage 2 and the net NPL figures, would it be right to assume that the credit cost in Q4 itself will come meaningfully down from what it was in Q3?

Yes. So we have shared the details in Page 25 of IR PPT on Asirvad bucket-wise details. And if you see the Stage 2 as on 31st December is only 106. So the trend shows a drastic improvement in decline in NPA in Q4.

No, no, I was asking about ma'am the ex -bucket collection efficiency in Asirvad in recent months, how much that is? I know that we have a lesser amount of new portfolio, but how much is the leakage still happening?

Yes, Manoj here. So I'll just answer the ex-bucket efficiency. I would rather answer that question to address both the new book and the old book. In our collection efficiency in our new book is at 99.78%, which is about -- which is roughly translating to one-third of my book. And how the CEO had mentioned earlier, in the next 2 quarters, we expect this to reverse in the sense that we should be looking at two-third of our book, our entire book running at similar collection efficiencies. So that is how robust it is currently. So that's on the ex-bucket. Having said that, even the balance of the one-third, which is the old book, we are seeing a collection efficiency increase about 2% quarter -on-quarter, which establishes the fact that we have not let the old book slip away. So we have put together a collection team from within the loan officers spread acro ss our branches where they're dedicated to focus on this so -called old book and the hard book. That should take care of our collection efficiencies.

Okay. Clear. Just one last one on cost of borrowing. Your standalone cost of borrowing has declined by 30 basis points Q-on-Q, but the consol only declined by 10 basis points. And when I look at Asirvad also, the cost of borrowing is actually flat. If you can just reconcile this?

Yes. So almost 85% of the borrowings standalone at INR880 crores. And the balance Asirvad is around 12% of consol borrowing at INR1020 crores and home finance at INR950 crores. So the weighted average is coming to INR898 crores.

But ma'am, that has actually declined only by 10 basis points because the stand -alone cost of borrowing has actually come down by 30 basis points and Asirvad is flat. So I was thinking that the delta improvement in consol level should have been higher than that?

So one reason is towards quarter end, we have done a lot of borrowing. So we will reconcile and get back to you.

The next question is from the line of Gao zhixuan , Schonfeld Zhixuan: Just some follow-up questions. Number one is on the consolidated statements. Under the revenue, the others line, which was INR27 crores last quarter. In the December quarter, it jumped to INR79 crores, almost INR80 crores. Just wondering what's that about? Is there any one-off in there?

Could you repeat your question, please? We just missed you in between.

Yes. In the other revenue, if I look at the financial statements consolidated under the others under revenue from operations, there's a INR79 crores revenue over there, which was INR27 crores in the September quarter. Just want to understand why the large jump and any one-off in there?

INR27 crores.

We will share offline if that is okay.

Okay. Sure. And lastly, on the standalone ROA, which is something about 3% right now. It's 1 years to 2 years, how should we think about this ROA going forward since our yield is just continue to stay here. How should we think about our trajectory on the standalone business?

ROA going forward?

Yes. We hope to maintain and improve upon ROA because per branch business is growing. So this year also, we have seen growth, and we expect that momentum to continue. So there will be a huge volume push in the branches. So the opex ,i.e, the HR cost, et c., will not have much impact. We don't expect much increase in the borrowing cost. So the ROA there will be…

I would say, yes, we should definitely be looking at 4.25% to 4.5%.

Yes.

4.25% to 4.5% standalone ROA.

Yes.

Yes.

The credit cost...

So that means...

Credit cost issues in the non-gold books will also come down. So that will...

I mean, is it where we want to be? I mean the specific answer is no. But as I said, we have a non- gold book of vehicle loan MSME, which is, of course, there will be some amount of impairment that we will see for 1, 2 quarters. So that's why we are factoring this when you talk to 4.25% to 4.5%.

The next question is from the line of Gaurav from Capital Farming Consultants.

So a couple of questions. First question is to Mr. Deepak, you mentioned that you are also working on co-lending, right? And this week only you had made it live. So just a clarification on that. Is it the co-lending agreement with the Asirvad that has been done? Because I think on the website of Asirvad, something like that has been displayed that co-lending agreement…

We are working with multiple partners right now, and Asirvad is one of them. And all 3 partners that we are working on, hopefully, the minimum of 3 partners should go live over the next 2 weeks, I would say, or 3 weeks at the most.

That's great. Second, I was referring this Slide number 9 of our presentation, right? So gold loan, everyone in India who is taking financial sector now is aware that gold loan is booming, right, as an industry. But for us as a company, right, every other segment where we are operating, whether it is vehicle finance, right, equipment finance, MSME lending or even housing finance, our NPA level, GNPA level, right, in housing finance, we are approximately 5%. vehicle finance, we are approximately 14%. MSME now we are touching around 6%, right? Where things are going wrong because such an elevated level of GNPA, right, coming from a lender like who is focused on gold loan, right, who knows that asset quality must be pristine. So where things have went wrong, have we analyzed that part while we have done the old the course correction in the last 2 quarters, 3 quarters or something -- some kind of accountability has been set up? Or how you would like to assure that whatever the balance assets we have, they are now remain in the pristine quality and not some other surprises which we might expect in a quarter or 2 down the line? Yes, that was my second question.

So you could see our -- the importance and seriousness of our thinking. In the fact, when I laid out my priorities, my first priority was accelerate gold. And my second priority was to follow up consolidate gold -- consolidate and growth strategy for non -gold, right? That's the order of the priorities to tell you how seriously we are taking it. I don't think we don't have to dwell on a post-mortem of what went right, what went wrong. It's a learning. We have obviously studied our entire model from acquisition to underwriting, to risk, to systems. We are taking that all into cognizance, and that's what we are strengthening -- till that's fully in place. That's why I told you MSME and vehicle loans, you will not see much growth even in the current quarter. It's only as we get into next year, you will start seeing growth , and we will correct it. And have we taken specific questions that you asked, have we seen why, what went wrong? Obviously, yes, because the starting point was if it is high, why is it high? What do we have to do to control it? What are the controls we have to put in place, what are the systems we have to put in place what are the different processes and credit polic ies, underwriting policies, risk policies, all of these have been taken into consideration, that's what we're working on. And that's why I said it will be a slow take-up. It is not -- these businesses are not something that we are going to overnight accelerate. We will get our process in place. We'll be comfortable with it. And of course, then we will grow them. These are -- we intend to grow these businesses. But when we are confident that we have learned from the past and our go forward is strong.

That's great. If you allow me one question. Within this, just a follow -up on this. Can you give some clarity what percentage of within this GNPA segment across the products that we have, what would be the percentage of customers, those who are defaulting in each of these categories, right? One customer who is defaulting in HFC housing finance also and to whom we have given the vehicle finance also to whom we have given the MSME loan for their business purpose also, right, or microfinance loan also. So are there any certain set of customers in percentage terms who are defaulting in more than 2, 3 categories? Or these are exclusively a different set of customers, no correlation over there?

No. So you're talking about customer level NPAs of customers across the group. I mean they're very, very miniscule. Oh sorry, I don't have the exact number with me offhand, but that's something that we look into very closely. And those are things which are monitored also very closely by us. It's very miniscule. I mean the -- and our customer level NPA policy takes that into consideration.

Yes. Great. My last question. I have asked in my couple of interactions also in last con calls on branch expansion, right, specifically on the gold loan side. So is it like there is something which is stopping RBI to give us branch expansion approval? Or is it related to Bain transaction once that is done by RBI , then only the RBI will give us approval for branch expansion? Or we are not going to the RBI for seeking approval for branch as of now. So what exactly is the road block or short stopper, which is not giving us an opportunity to expand the branches, specifically for the gold?

I think I explained that the point in our previous earnings calls also. This is, of course -- I mean, I can't speak on behalf of the RBI why they're giving or not giving , that's not what I can speak about. But I believe this also because there's a very significant transaction with a new co - promoter coming on. And I think that's the first priority, which probably the regulator is also looking at. We don't see any reason why we will not get approval shortly. We hope to. We have put up our proposals to RBI, which we hope will be favourably decided upon. And any specific reason that you think that we have, why we are not getting anything? The answer is absolutely not, nothing like that.

The next question is from the line of Shubhranshu Mishra from Phillip Capital.

Hi Deepak. Good to hear your voice here at Manappuram. Given the fact that you're pretty much outlining to change the organization at various levels, one, if we can maybe in the medium term, 2 to 3 years from now? Second is you also spoke about LOS, LMS transformation. So which are the tech partners we are looking at to have this changed? Would this have different kind of LOS LMS for various kinds of asset classes that we would be working on? The third part is, are we rationalizing the manpower or having a different orientation for the manpower if that would be the concern.

Good to hear your voice too. Two, 3 questions. One on -- I mean a lot of your questions, I must say, came a little gabbled to us. I hope I'm answering the questions right. One was, of course, on the strategy, which you told us and Shubhranshu, my request is please bear with us for -- as we move into FY '27 when we'll share our well thought through strategy. I request you to bear with us. On our tech architecture, what it is going to be will be premature at this stage because that's the journey we have just started with multiple tech partners. The whole study is going on because we have to take into consideration multiple factors. One is what is the market today. Two, what is the market expected to be in 3 years, 4 years. And so we have to build a tech platform, not just for today, we have to build a tech platform that is going to last us for the next 10 years. And with the advancements which are happening out here, the solutions are quite complicated to make. It's not just plain cookie cutter, but we are working toward s that -- to put that in place. We're working with multiple partners. It's not one partner. Specific to your question on LOS, LMS, will different products have different LOSs, LMSs. I think that's an output of our entire exercise, then we will know. But all I can assure you is whatever it is, each individual product will have individual workflows customized for themselves. It will not be one standard workflow that we will use for all -- I mean, for all products. We will have strong LOSs for different asset classes, which are also figurative of how our competitors also use it with a forward-looking lens also. And manpower was your next question. I think that's a constant one, right? You will always have options to optimize technology will come in. Can you optimize manpower? All that is, yes. But will the absolute manpower come down? Obviously, no. Because if you're going to talk abo ut our AUM continuing to be INR 50,000 and then we are putting in technology and then people will come down. I don't think we are looking at that. We are looking at a very, very strong future for the company where our AUM and our growth is going to be multiples of what we are today. So I don't think there's too much to read into this at this stage. It will be steady state, well thought through, well calibrated. And we'll take the long- term approach. It will not be a short-term approach. It will be a medium- to long-term approach that we take.

One last question, . Bain Capital also holds a controlling stake in Tyger Capital , which was erstwhile Adani Capital Okay, do Manappuram Finance to have that controlling…

Sorry to interrupt, your voice is not audible properly.

So Bain Capital holds a controlling stake in Tyger Capital, which was erstwhile Adani Capital. Is it possible to have that company merged into Manappuram so that they continue to hold a controlling stake in that entity as such?

So are we are open to that merger.

Shubranshu will be -- and our Chairman rightly said, will -- what are the options that they're looking at? Will it be taken? I think that is completely not. That's a question you should -- you should probably ask to Bain Capital. I don't think it is premat ure. And you've seen us holding statements on this whole transaction. There are certain questions asked, which we have given responses to and we are awaiting clarification.

The next question is from the line of Prithviraj Patil from Investec.

So I had 2 questions. One, I wanted the option number for the quarter, the gold option number. And the second was what is the incremental yield on the gold loan?

Actually is around INR32 crores during the quarter. The yield currently stands around 18%.

Hello?

Auction is around INR32 crores during the quarter. Our current yield stands at 18%.

Hello?

Can you hear us?

Yes. So I just wanted the auction number and the incremental yield on gold?

So auction is around INR32 crores during the quarter and our current yield at 18% on gold loan book.

The next question is from the line of Pratik Kothari from Unique PMS.

Sir, one on opex again. So if we go back 3 years, 4 years at similar branch productivity of about INR10 crores, INR 11 crores where we are right now, the larger peer, Muthoot used to be materially lower than where we are. So if you can just highlight where is this mismatch? We are in the 5s, they were in the 3s at similar productivity, and I'm going back 4 years now. So if you can just highlight where is that mismatch? What can we do to improve between us?

So Mr. Pratik, I think I've laid out the various actions we are taking towards this. And as we roll out our strategy, as we roll out our operating plan for next year also. I think you'll have visibility going back 4 years, 5 years and comparing with competitors who did what, who did well, I don't think we want to do this on a call.

No because do we agree there's a mismatch and we want to work on that, but this is how our business is structured and this stays as it is?

No, we have answered that question, right? We have very strong aspirations of growth of the company. And when we lay out a strategy, you will see it for us. I mean, obviously, we are obviously not happy and we will never be happy with where we are. Our whole orientation will be always that we have to do better than what we are wherever we are at whatever stage we are, and that's our orientation. There is a lot of work to do, which we are working on, and the results will follow and we'll share with you the plan. As we get into next quarter, we'll share the plan with you.

Almost of the per branch AUM.

And you would have seen, I mean, even already you would have seen our per branch AUM from the beginning of the year to this year, we were a little behind. We know why we're behind. We have also explained to the reasons because we also followed a different pricing strategy as one of them, one of important things. We have taken those actions, and you will see that we are here to be a dominant player in the market in which we will be.

Correct. And this 4.25%, 4.5% stand-alone ROE, I mean, what time line did we give for that?

As we go into the second half of next year.

The next question is from the line of Bharat Singh, an Individual Investor.

I have one question. This -- like in Asirvad Finance, there is some impairment losses. We are booking like each quarter, we see the losses. So these losses is complete losses or in the later quarter, they will be cover up?

Yes. So the collection efforts are going on for the NPA book also. But you have seen that in MFI, once it is 90 DPD, the collection is very difficult. But a lot of effort is going on. We are taking the collection agencies also to improve the collection. But as the quality of book is improving, we will see a reduced credit cost in the coming quarters.

Yes, we should see reduced credit costs. And we have taken some impairment this time even on ASC book as a prudent measure, even though we did have to some small amounts. But -- and as I mentioned, the outlook is looking strong, sir.

Okay. My next question one is, like now Bain Capital, they are acquiring controlling stake in the company. So it will be from the promoter will be shifted to the Bain Capital. And also when this transaction will happen, there will be open offer. But as I read that this open offer will be -- was priced at INR236. But now price for the stock has already increased way higher. So when this open offer will come, there is a chance that Bain Capital will get more stake in the company?

These details are already given.

See promoters are not selling the stake. This is…

Okay.

Yes. This is entirely primary, right? So this is already -- it is told to the market about the plan of 9% equity now once the approval is received, then 9% through convertible warrants, which will be converted into equity in another 18 months. So they will have 18% stake. And the present promoters will have more than 28% stake, it will continue. So it will be -- the Bain is -- it will be a case of joint promoters, existing promoters along with Bain as a joint promoter.

As that was the last question for the day. I would now hand the conference over to Mr. V.P. Nandakumar for closing comments. Over to you, sir.

So thank you so much for your active participation as usual. Now this time, I hope you could hear more about the new CEO strategy also. I hope that will definitely help you to understand what the company will be in the coming 1 or 2 years' time. So thank y ou so much for the questions.

Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you all. Thank you very much, and thank you for your continued support.

Thank you. On behalf of DAM Capital Advisors Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.