Thank you very much. We will now begin the question-and- answer session. We will take our first question from the line of Binay from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
FY2026 Q2
Hi, team. Congratulations on good set of numbers. I have two questions on the two things that you announced in this earnings. So, firstly, on the BKC side, you have talked about the revised structure with Leela focusing more on the hotel side and Brookfield more on the commercial side. Could you share your thought process on that, that what led to the change and link to that, INR 800 crore of CAPEX that you are talking about? Which year does it sort of start and how to think about that? That is the first question.
So, Binay, thanks for the question. Initially, the structure that we had discussed was that it was a mixed-use development with 50% of the hotel and office to be owned by Leela and 50% by Brookfield. Now we have looked at the revised structure as we spoke in the earlier call. 50% of the hotel now will be owned by Leela and the balance 50% of the hotel and the 100% office will be owned by Brookfield. The total capital contribution from Leela's side is around INR 800 crores for the CAPEX. We have already started spending the CAPEX because we are paying for the land lease to MMRDA and this CAPEX will be spent in the next 4 years and the thought was that we would be able to use the additional capital that could be freed up in near-term operating assets that will be ROCE accretive, Binay.
Binay, if I may come in, this is Ankur. Sites like these are unique. At the same time, it is a unique relationship between Brookfield, the promoter of Leela, as well as Brookfield as a very large real estate Company globally. And it is always prudent for palace properties to have ownership. We have always maintained that, that palaces should be held on The Leela balance sheet. They are highly accretive. As the presentation mentions, 16% yield-on cost is available to Leela on the hotel site through a combination of fees as well as the ownership. Now, this yield-on cost is lower on the office site given there is no HMA income. And hence, it is prudent that Leela focuses its capital into core business of hotel ownership and operations. But Brookfield provides synergy as well as capital support to ensure that the benefit at the site of higher FSI is available to Leela. You don't have to over-commit to a very large hotel, for example. We can commit to the ideal mix. Office will help the hotel and vice versa. And I think having ownership in the hotel and joint ownership at the hotel with the JV partner is a good thing for Leela, as well as not exposing Leela business to office risks is a prudent one. So, in our engagement with various stakeholders, that has been agreed and Brookfield has accepted to take the entire development of office on its side.
Right. So, the land is jointly shared between the two of you, right? For the whole site.
That is correct.
And then just linked to the second structure, the second deal that we announced in Dubai. One is that, again, we see Leela partnering with Brookfield. So, how to think about it going ahead? Will this be a template that we will see more and more? Or is it more where you see an opportunity and Leela doesn't have the balance sheet that Brookfield steps in?
I would say it is very unique for Leela to have a sponsor like Brookfield. It is very unique, not just for Leela in India, but it is unique globally, where the principal shareholder is able to, through these joint ventures, able to provide the support as well as strategic expansion. So, for example, in Dubai, it is an amazing transaction. Now, no hotel Company in India today can, on its own, take up a half a billion dollar transaction plus expansion capital or redevelopment capital. At the same time, it is very, very, very attractive. Entry yield is about 12.9 times. All of the money will be back through sale of residences. Effectively, the equity in the hotel portion will be marginal or almost nothing. So, highly attractive transaction. And Leela can generate significant management fees from this transaction. So, Leela gets the benefit of the sponsorship and the ownership that Brookfield provides and is able to access gateway properties, unique locations, amazing non -replaceable real estate, or virtually impossible to replace real estate and to be able to put its flag into these locations, earn management fees, and earn EBITDA at very attractive return on capital. You are talking about, on a stabilized basis, a low single-digit multiple EBITDA, which means very high double-digit return on capital, plus growth. So, you are talking about high 20s IRRs for both these transactions, which is almost impossible for a standalone hotel Company to access. But through a partnership with its sponsor, it is able to get these unique transactions done.
That is helpful. Actually, just putting all this together, how to th ink about Leela's own balance sheet in the coming years because the CAPEX intensity would inch up? So, any revised numbers on what sort of a , because most of these properties are actually the Dubai one is already operational. So, you will start getting some EBITDA from there, but the BKC…
A lot of EBITDA. A lot of EBITDA by the way. So, by the time the conversion happens , as I mentioned, this is at a 13, 12.5x multiple. So, it is highly cash accretive on day one. On the BKC asset capital, while we lay out the total capital of INR 800 crores, it will happen over 4 years, right? And as most construction projects go, a lot of capital is back-ended by the time finishing and other things happen. So, a lot of the capital is back -ended and Leela's balance sheet is still very, very strong to do the smaller deals and HMA contracts and key money etc., on its own. So, this is a prudent way, in a combined transaction for both of these put together for Leela is a fraction of what it will need to do if it was standing by its own balance sheet . Leela's balance sheet is very strong. Our rating is very strong our debt levels are very low and all of these transactions are being funded by cash available on its balance sheet right now.
Thank you. We will take our next question from the line of Sumit Kumar from JM Financial Institutional Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi. Good evening. Congratulations on a good set of numbers and the new Dubai acquisition. My first question is on the Dubai acquisition. If you could explain the point on the equity would be bought back with, the 25 % equity that Leela holds would be bought back from the sale of residences. So, how much would be the proceeds from such sale of residences and will that be an arm's length transaction when we do that and how are you thinking about that?
Let me just chime in here. Everything is arm's length. Everything is at the same basis. So, Leela is 25. Brookfield fund is 75. It is at the same basis. What we mentioned is that in the next two to three years, so the hotel consists of 370 odd keys and residences, the balance. Our business plan is to sell the residences. Now the capital gain and the net proceeds from that will ensure that the dividends back to shareholders, the two shareholders in 25/75 ratio is enough for the initial equity in its entirety to be returned, which means that Leela will end up owning a 25% stake. Now this is all subject to our business plans panning out, but we believe the market is very, very strong, which means we expect that dividends back or distributions back to Leela over the next three, maybe 3 plus years or maybe 3 minus years will be enough such that the equity invested in this property, net equity post the distribution over the next three odd years will be practically zero. So, Leela will end up owning a 25% stake in this resort of 360 odd keys for practically no equity over the next 3 years. It makes it very, very attractive and have a management contract that will generate 50 plus crores of annual income on top of it . So, it will own 25% stake and the HMA fees generating solid EBITDA and get all its money back through distributions . Everything is arm’s length. Everything is equitable . Everything is at the same basis as two to 25 as two shareholders would be.
And the second question is to Ravi. If you could give us the breakup of room revenue and F&B for this quarter and any sort of color on the RevPAR growth across properties, what properties drove this during the quarter grow this number?
So, Sumit, I will give you a breakup of the city and the resort . The city hotels RevPAR was almost 14% and resort were 10% for Quarter 2. And if I tell you H1, it was a city hotel that drove 14.5% and resort did 22.5%. Jaipur did a very healthy occupancy that drove the occupancy. It did early 60s from the last H1 of around 50%. So, that was driver. In terms of ADR, the hotel that did drive the ADR was Chennai, Bengaluru and Udaipur.
And the breakup of room revenues and F&B if you have?
So, room revenue, I can give it to you. The room revenue was INR 147 crores against last quarter of INR 130 crores. And F&B was INR 120 crores against last quarter of INR 113 crores.
That is all from my side.
Sir, congrats on the transaction and all the best for your international foray. S ir, would there be any further investment in Dubai property from Leela's side? And I also understand that the property was not having such a great review from the guests. So, is it that we will first renovate the hotel and apartments and then we will start to sell ? Some clarity on these , and how much could be the realization per residences?
Hi, Prashant. Like you said, it is an operating hotel and let me just give you a little bit about the asset. It has got 546 keys with a 63 square meter average room size and a great iconic location. So, this particular property is running at a high occupancy and to give you a market standpoint, all properties on the beachfront on the Jumeirah have a blended occupancy of close to 75% and an average rate of US$600 to US$700. This particular asset, we will have a CAPEX plan, which will deploy CAPEX to upgrade the asset quality, bring it up to The Leela brand standards. And the capital plan will be rolled out in a systematic and a phased out manner, knowing the fact that it is an operating hotel. This property is spread over 23 acres and has various wings. So, you can understand that we will work on this and develop a capital plan to ensure that we can be efficient about our CAPEX strategy. It is a good operating property with very good operating outcomes and customer feedback.
And on the residences part?
So, sorry, what about the residences?
On the residences also, would we start selling it after renovation or will we start selling it on as is where is basis? And what could be the realization on a broad assumption?
It will be post renovation and rebranding. And that will take some time. So, it won't be fair for us to comment upon the actual pricing today. But to your question, it will be post renovation upgrade as well as rebranding. Dubai is a very stellar market for residential ri ght now. And we expect that with the brand strength, it will only get better.
And apartments also will be as Leela residences.
That is correct.
That is right.
And sir, we would be shutting down hotel for renovation or it will be part renovation which typically is in case of soft refurb, how would the renovation pan out?
And sir, in the slide, investor presentation that you have shared, in a slide, there was mention of around…
Mr. Biyani, I request you to join back the queue, please , as we have other participants waiting for their turn.
This is the last question. So, the purchase price mentioned was $503 million. And then Leela is paying around $49 million for 25%. So, if you can explain these two figures, it would be great.
The total transaction value, the enterprise value is $503 million, which, as you mentioned, which will be funded through a combination of debt and equity. The total equity part out of this $503 million is $200 million. And our share of equity being 25% is $49 million. The balance will be through non-recourse debt.
We will take our next question from the line of Abhay Khaitan from A xis Capital. Please go ahead.
So, my first question is again on Palm Jumeirah asset. Firstly , want to understand given that it is already an operating asset and there might be some renovation , by when can we expect the numbers to start hitting in The Leela financials? And what could be the, I mean, you mentioned Rs. 50 crore of income from the management fees and then the 25% that come from the own room revenue that could be on top of it. So, if you can give a ballpark on how much can be the overall expectation of realization and by when can we start putting it?
So, as we clearly state, it is an operating hotel and has a strong demand and operating leverage already. We are expecting to close the deal in the next 30 to 40 days , and hence we will start earning revenue from day one. The hotel is currently generating approximately $40 odd millions of EBITDA. It would be rebranded post renovations to The Leela brand in 2027. I hope that answers your question.
Yes, perfect. And my second question is on the growth that we have seen in this quarter . So, basically, throughout the industry we have seen some slowdown in RevPAR growth particularly in the key metro cities whereas for Leela we have seen a very strong 14% RevPAR growth for the city hotels. Can you explain on what were the key drivers behind this major divergence and can we expect this to sustain going forward?
Just to set some context as we have always maintained, in Leela we have built a luxury ecosystem which is beyond just rooms and experiences, but also food and beverage, banqueting, retail and wellness. And we also have a very strong proprietary sales and distribution system , which has shown the value in this particular quarter as you speak. The industry in luxury has grown by 5%, but Leela has grown to approximately 14% to 17%, which is 3 times of what the normal luxury industry has grown in this quarter. This quarter we also had some big focus on driving direct business focusing on our website , which we started this journey a couple of quarters back and also ensuring that a lot of focus and intervention in new launches . We relaunched two new restaurants, Le Cirque as I spoke about earlier and the Qube in Leela Palace New Delhi. In Leela, it's always been about creating experiences which allow us not just a high net promoter score of 86 but also allow us to charge a delta and create a delta when it comes to pricing and guest feedback and repeat usage , which has a correlation to the RevPAR growth and to the EBITDA margins.
We will take our next question from the line of Achal Kumar from HSBC. Please go ahead.
I had three very quick questions. So, first of all, you mentioned that over this quarter operating leverage helped you significantly. So, 70% of flow-through to EBITDA. Just want to understand what was the source of this operating leverage, how big was it, and how much further operating leverage do you see still available to you guys in the system? My second question was about how do you see Bengaluru market, which is definitely one of the key market for you and recently with pressure in IT sector, any thoughts on that? And finally, I think to continue the previous question, one of the previous question, just want to understand when you say you are targeting INR 20 billion of EBITDA in FY '30, could you give a bit more color in terms of how sort of did you arrive that number? I mean, what kind of room inventory, what kind of RevPAR growth are you building in, and then how that would increase your debt levels or the CAPEX? Something on that sort would be helpful.
First, Leela operates at a very efficient operating flow -through and even if you look at the last two years, we have operated at 65% operating flow-through. This quarter, 70% flow-through was also impact of treasury income that came in from the cash that is available in the balance sheet, but even if I exclude the impact of treasury income, we are at a 67% flow-through in H1. That is reflected because of the RevPAR growth managed by the cost management efficiencies for in Chennai, for example, we have just launched a 2.5 Megawatts of solar plant. That ensures that our cost structures are always efficient . That allows for that 67% flow-through, and we expect that in the coming quarters as well, we will maintain these flow-through. Secondly on the Bengaluru market, if you see quarter-by-quarter we have improved our performance. If you look at Quarter 2, we did a 71% occupancy for Bengaluru, and the rate growth literally was 9% and RevPAR growth was 16%. So, quarter-by-quarter, we have improved the performance. There have been considerable CAPEX spend on Bengaluru and we have created a complete luxury ecosystem where rooms have been renovated. We launched Maharaja Ballroom. We had ZLB. Now we are launching, we have launched the entire luxury retail wing and the ARQ Club has also been launched in Bengaluru. In that market, there is literally zero luxury supply coming for me and demand is increasing. We are investing in the asset. The corporate travel is increasing and that hotel in every quarter will keep improving in terms of the business.
And I will kind of explain to you the bridge between where we started . I mean, the FY '25 numbers of EBITDA are known to you. We did INR 700 crores of EBITDA from FY '25. On a10% to 11% growth on RevPAR on same store, our existing ownership hotels should take us to an EBITDA of close to INR 1,200 crores by FY’30. Our value drivers plus the new pipeline that we are building on which we have already declared Agra, Ayodhya, Bandhavgarh, Ranthambore, Srinagar, without including BKC and Dubai as of now should give us another INR 250 crores of EBITDA, which takes us to close to INR 1,500 crores. Now the last INR 500 crores would come through new acquisitions and growing. Given the size of our balance sheet and our strategy in terms of growing our portfolio in the luxury space, we are evaluating several opportunities as we speak to ensure that by the time we reach FY’30, the last INR 500 crores will come from there.
Anuraag, I will just add to it. These two transactions that we have double clicked on today, the total capital committed net of the distributions which we expect back in the next three odd years, three, four years. So, fast forward four cycles, in about INR 800 crores of total capital invested, which is pretty insignificant in terms of the size of Leela’s business today, we will be generating close to INR 300 crores of EBITDA from that capital deployed, net of the distribution that we would see from these two projects itself. Now that is a very, very high ROI, ROC, whichever way you want to think about , you know, return on capital. And these are unique to Leela today. And we can replicate some of it. We can replicate it in a completely capital-light manner. We can replicate it in a partnership manner. We can replicate it to the extent it is required on Leela's own sources. But I think the INR 2,000 crores number is within our sights already. And I would like to believe that the business has potential to do even larger numbers without a lot of capital required. As these three examples show us, these are very, very, very unique to a business like Leela. I am not sure how many such opportunities are available to the market participants. Usually it is about a 15 multiple or 20 multiple or whatever people need to spend on buying a hotel, which really does not have any other operating levers attached to it. But that is not the case for Leela. I hope that answers your question.
Next question is from the line of Karan Khanna from Ambit Capital. Please go ahead.
Thanks for the opportunity and congrats for another great quarter. Firstly, two clarifications, Ravi. One, if you can help simplify the BKC development for us, what were the CAPEX commitments earlier and what would be the CAPEX now? I understand it will be INR 800 crores. But given that you won't be doing the commercial project over there, so is there any evaluation behind that at which this transaction has been done with the private entity? So, firstly, just clarification, Ravi, if you can help simplify the BKC development now, given that you were looking at 50% share in the hotel and the commercial project earlier, and now I think entirely 50% in the hotel. So, what kind of changes in terms of the overall CAPEX including land are we looking at for the BKC project? And second, given that now the entire commercial project will be developed by the private entity, so is there some evaluation done for that? Or is it reflected in the overall construction and land cost for the project?
Thanks, Karan, for the question. For the BKC, now with the revised structure that we have announced today, we are only focusing on the core hotel operation and as a result, 50% of the hotel will be owned by Leela, 100% of the office and 50% of the hotel wi ll be owned by Brookfield. Our total equity contribution, which is the land and the CAPEX , total capital contribution for the land and the hotel will be INR 800 crores and that will generate almost INR 150 crores- INR 155 crores in the stabilized year, INR 30-35 crores from the fees and the balance INR 120 crores from EBITDA, giving us 16% to 17% of YOC.
Sir, just a follow -up on just another clarification. When you look at the mid -teen EBITDA guidance for FY’26, if I look at first half itself, you have done about 34% and about 22% on operating EBITDA. So, are you expecting some moderation in terms of RevPAR or the margin in second half or is that more of a conservative guidance for second half of FY’26?
So, Karan in our last call, we had given guidance that we will do a mid to high teens of EBITDA. We are on track of achieving that by the end of the financial year. If you see our H1 performance, we have already done almost 30% EBITDA growth from H1. Almost a good part of the revenue comes from the H2 and we have a strong business on book setting and we are on track to achieve.
And just lastly, on this bridge from INR 1,500 crores to INR 2,000 crores, Anuraag, what sort of acquisition are you looking at? Will it be outright or will it again be a structure similar to what we are seeing in the Palm Jumeirah acquisition where essentially we will be looking at a part stake in a hotel where you will be partnering with Brookfield or the present entity towards the acquisition?
Karan, we just spoke about the two hotels, Dubai and BKC hotel itself will give us INR 300 crores of EBITDA. So, we just have to look at solving for INR 200 crores of EBITDA. There are a lot of potential deals that we are evaluating which can give us EBITDA post in the near term to mid term that will take care of INR 200 crores rather we should be able to do more with HMAs.
This is helpful, Ravi.
Next question is from the line of Vaibhav Muley from YES Securities. Please go ahead.
Hi, team. Congratulations on a strong set of numbers. My first question was on Dubai transaction. So, we have mentioned that $49 million would be the upfront capital required. So, how would the payment be made? Will it be through own cash and bank balance or do you plan to take incremental debt for this ? And about the non-recourse debt, what would be the finance cost and when will it start reflecting into the P&L? And what kind of incremental finance cost can we start seeing on the P&L?
So, Vaibhav, you know, the $49 million that we have to pay as our contribution will be funded from an internal accrual. We already have more than INR 1,000 crores of cash sitting in the balance sheet and the non-recourse debt we are finalizing the terms. We are discussing with the bankers and we will come with more details.
But when do we expect to finalize the, make the rest of the payment , sir? I mean, when can we see the incremental finance cost?
Incremental, first, the debt will not be consolidated because it is a 25% JV that we will have. So, debt will not be consolidated.
And secondly, on our EBITDA guidance of mid to high-teen growth for FY’26, we have a pretty strong base in terms of RevPAR for last year Q3 and Q4 where we did grow by 13% to 15%. So, are you confident that on a high base you will be able to achieve a stronger growth in terms of RevPAR, let's say sustain the growth of again mid-teens? And is there any sort of green shoots that you have started to see in terms of advanced bookings?
Already, we see a very strong and a robust pace and a momentum. The H2 of the year not just is one of the best cycles that we are going to have . There are also some big events that are planned in the country in the locations that we are present in. We are also seeing some green shoots, as you alluded to, of international business coming in, more celebration events and some very high impact large city events. All of that will contribute to continue the momentum that we have built up in H1 and grow from the same.
We will take our next question from the line of Sumanth Kumar from Motilal Oswal. Please go ahead.
So, I can understand Dubai investment is at a very attractive valuation. So, my question is, what is the thought process when we have a huge opportunity in India and we are entering into the Dubai market?
So, Sumanth, let me first tell you that as we have always been talking, the brand Leela is extremely well recognized and Dubai is a very important market for Leela, both for inbound, the feeder market, as well as from Leela guests who travel to Dubai, as you know. Secondly, this investment opportunity comes to us at a very attractive basis. We are getting 25% of ownership of the asset in one of the best locations on the beachfront in Palm Jumeirah at a very attractive basis, as Ankur mentioned, at 12.8 multiple of CY’25 EBITDA. Thirdly, the fee generations that we are anticipating, the management fee generation that we are expecting from this asset, given this location and our ability to command high ADRs and RevPARs in every hotel that we operate in, is going to be yielding us close to INR 55 crores to INR 65 crores in terms of stabilized management fee generations. And the equity comes back to us that we are deploying of $49 million that we spoke about earlier in two to three years through the sale of branded residences. So, the size of the opportunity, the location of the asset, the iconic nature, it ’s brand fit in the market that is of great interest to us, and the investment thesis, all of those make it a very, very compelling opportunity for us. And we continue to evaluate opportunities. As Ravi mentioned, we have the capacity in our balance sheet and to continue to look at growing our portfolio to the best opportunity that we can.
In India?
In India as well.
So, any further plan we have if we will get more opportunity we can invest in Dubai market?
It is too early to say that.
And how is the return ratio, apart from, say, going forward, if we will not get this kind of attractive valuation, will we invest or not?
This is Ankur. If we don't get attractive valuations, we will not invest. In any case, Leela's business is very largely focused on the India market and with adjacency to the source markets like Dubai where we can create outsized value for the business. But if you don't find attractive deals, whether it's in Dubai or anywhere else in the world, or even in India, we shall be patient and we shall wait.
In the growth perspective, when we talk about India ARR growth, you have an opportunity. Similar kind of growth opportunity you see in Dubai market?
In this specific location, yes. In this specific opportunity, yes. You know, India growth is the best in the world right now. So, I can't compare macro growth always. In any case, there are lots of markets in India where growth is not happening. There are lots of sectors in India where growth is not happening. So , we believe in the particular situation where we can add value, where the situation deserves our attention, and where we have the potential to have outsized returns. So, we can't be thematic about a particular country and a particular market in a particular deal situation. Thematically, India hospitality, India hospitality in the luxury space is a very long -term theme, in our opinion. And Leela is in the best position to play that theme for a very, very long time. As I mentioned, adjacencies will exist both in terms of feede r markets as well as in terms of markets where we can expand the brand. And opportunistically, our capital, which has a very high return attached to it.
Next question is from the line of Murtuza Arsiwalla from Kotak Securities. Please go ahead.
Just on the Dubai acquisition itself, the 182 residences are currently operational sort of rooms, and that will be sold off. And so the EBITDA numbers that we are looking at is after that sell - off. And again, if I were to look at the 400-odd crores of equity investment by Leela Palaces, if I were to simply equate that, when you talk about the two to three years of repayment through the sale of the residences, should I consider that equivalent to what the consideration you would get from sale of the villas? Is that understanding broadly in order?
On a 25% basis, yes , Murtuza, you are correct. We should be able to return the capital plus whatever more capital needs to be invested for the renovation work in the next three years. So, that money will be out and the hotel of 350 plus keys will still be owned 25% and the management contract on the entire estate will still belong to Leela.
We have our next question from the line of Raghav Malik from Jefferies. Please go ahead.
Just to follow up on the new properties , so if you could tell us a bit more about the current ownership of the Dubai Hotel and the reason for selling. And also just a clarification on the BKC projects. You said your contribution of CAPEX is INR 800 crores for 50% stake. So, is the total CAPEX then INR 1, 600 crores for Schloss would also be 50%? Sorry, Brookfield. Is that correct?
So, the CAPEX for the BKC Hotel, that is our capital contribution from both debt equity would be around INR 800 crores. That is 50% from the hotel side. The office side is 100% funded and owned by Brookfield Properties. So, they will be handling the CAPEX for the office side.
And on the ownership of the Dubai asset, it is owned by two families in the Middle East. They developed this asset in 2013 and are looking to sell it as it is in a JV and both partners want to exit.
And just on your guidance, so you gave the mid to high-teens EBITDA growth guidance for the years. If we may be adjust for the rentals and other operating income that is not in the base, would that be may be a mid-teens guidance then for EBITDA for FY’26?
Yes. So, even the guidance that we had given was for operating EBITDA, excluding treasury income, we will do a mid-teens to high-teens EBITDA growth by the end of the financial year.
And sorry, lastly, just on the RevPAR growth and room revenue growth, so there is a bit of a discrepancy, 13% and 12% respectively. So, what would that be on account of?
There is no discrepancy. You are looking at a 4% occupancy absolute growth. If you look at that growth will be around 6%, 7% and ADR is also around 7%, so that is 13%. Occupancy, you should not look at absolute. If you look at occupancy as a percentage growth, that will be 6% , and ADR is 7%, combination is 13% RevPAR growth.
And the room revenue growth is 12%. So, that is lower than RevPAR growth, right? That's the, like, what is the discrepancy there?
It is a rounding off. It is a rounding off.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will take that as last question for today. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Anuraag Bhatnagar, Whole-Time Director and CEO, for closing comments. Over to you, sir.
Thank you. Thank you, everyone, for being with us for this call. As we finish the first half of the year, we are very excited about what lies ahead in H2 of this year. The two big announcements that we made in this call, the Dubai acquisition and the restr ucturing of BKC, really creates a very strong platform for us and expands our platform internationally as well. Our focus on pure play luxury, our commitment to excellence, our focus in consistently strengthening our luxury ecosystem through award-winning F&B, wellness, and other offerings considerably increases our capacity to earn premiums and charge premiums. So, thank you all for being there in this call and looking forward to a great H2 ahead.
Thank you, members of the Management team. On behalf of Leela Palaces Hotels & Resorts Limited, that conclude this conference. Thank you for joining us and you may now disconnect your lines. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This transcript has been edited for readability and does not purport to be a verbatim record of the proceedings.