Good evening, everyone, and thank you for joining us on Finolex Cables Limited Q4 FY '25 Earnings Conference Call. Today, we have with us Mr. Mahesh Viswanathan, Director, CEO and Chief Financial Officer from Finolex Cables. Before we begin, I would like to state that some of the statements made in today's discussion may be forward-looking in nature. We will begin the call with the opening remarks from the management, after which we will have the forum open for an interactive Q&A session. As a reminder, all participant lines will be in the listen only mode and should you need assistance during this conference call, yo u may signal the operator by pressing star then zero on your touch tone phone. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Mahesh Viswanathan. Thank you, and over to you, sir.

Thank you, Neerav. Good afternoon, everybody. Thank you for joining on this call. I'm sure by now, you must have seen the results, reviewed them, dissected them. And you will have questions, I'll be happy to answer them. By way of introduction, the quarter has been dece nt. After a difficult second and third quarter, I think we have pulled back with a growth of about 14% quarter-on-quarter and 35% from the immediately preceding quarter. Profit numbers are also good. At INR208 crores, the profit before tax, the highest that we have seen so far per quarter. Margins were under pressure throughout the year. There has been a lot of volatility on the commodity side. And that, together with a few changes in the mix has resulted in a lower contribution, lower margin during the year. Some of it, we will be able to catch up. Those are timing differences, which we will be able to catch up. The rest, the product mix and so on, we'll have to see how to manage those in the future. Barring this short comments, I do not have much more by way of an introduction. So let's go straight into the Q&A session. So I'm open to questions now.

Thank you very much. The first question is from the line of Vidit Trivedi from Asian Market Securities. Please go ahead.

I have 2 questions. First is, could you please elaborate on the commercial potential and the margin profile of the e -beam products which were launched during the year? And second is, any guidance for the capex for this year and the coming year? And any update on the BharatNet opportunity?

Okay. So 3 questions, actually. On the e-beam project that was commissioned early this year, January. And we have launched 2 sets of products in the market. One is on the construction side, building were, which is our most premium wire, it has all the features, halogen-free flame resistant as well as e-beam cured. So in terms of life, minimum life of about 25 years. And in terms of performance, far superior to everything else that we have got so far. That was launched in -- towards the end of February. Simultaneously, we also launched the solar cables. There was a little bit of delay in getting the BIS approval, which we now have. So these are 2 offerings that are available at this point in time. We expect the pl an to generate revenue when it is in full steam of about INR 500 crores to INR600 crores per year from these 2 products. Newer products will add on to that revenue stream. So that's one question answered. Your second question was on the capex. Last year...

Sorry to interrupt you. Second was on the margin profile of these new launch products?

Okay. We still have to find the right pricing part for it. They have just been launched. So at the moment, the launch prices are quite attractive. But I think over the next 3 to 4 months as we see demand picking up, that is when our final pricing policy very much. So I think it's a little early to talk about that at this moment. The second part of your question was on capex. '24, '25, our capex has been about -- actual spend has been INR 236 crores. We had announced a INR 500 crores plan 2 years ago. Out of which about INR 160 crores was spent in '23, '24. 235 -- INR236 crores was spent in the last fiscal. The remaining part will be spent in the current year. Most of it -- so all those projects should get closed by the end of this fiscal. Additionally, always, there is a reinstatement capex of about INR40 crores, INR 50 crores. So that is something that will be spent. We're working on a few other plants, but not ready as yet to make an announcement. So once those are finalized, we'll come back. The last part of your question was on the BharatNet project. We had participated in -- as a consortium partner, we had taken part and we have placed bids in 2 of those circles Unfortunately, we did not -- our consortium did not get any place position in those 2 bits. However, many of the winners across the 16 circles, have used our manufacturers authorization to place their bids so we are in discussion with many of those winners, and we are hopeful of a decent level of business in the current and the next years.

Next question is from the line of Sonali Salgaonkar from Jefferies India.

So my first question is regarding the m ix change that you were talking about in your initial remarks. Maybe I understand what exactly have you changed in the production mix and what percentage does each end user segment account for...

In construction wide still accounts for the majority of sales, but what has changed in terms of mix is the stand-alone sales through in the form of standard boxes. That has come down vis -a- vis project sales. And as you know, project sales is where the price is discounted to some extent. So the composition of project sales to total has changed over the last few years, and this year was more pronounced. So that's the major reason.

No. Like the -- we do not sell directly to any project, we sell it through our distribution channel only. So in that sense, our sales are routed through the channel. However, we know that many of those sales are going 2 projects. And therefore, there is a discounting on the price.

Yes, very clear. So what is the mix right now of projects versus, say, 3 years back?

That would have changed maybe between -- about the 8% to 10%, that would be a shift.

So incremental delta 8% to 10% towards project?

Correct.

So my second question is regarding the BharatNet commentary that you made that many of the bidders, I didn't quite understand that. Are you saying that many of the bidders are going to use other optic fiber cables for that?

See, at this time around quite a few of the bidders are not actually producing optic fiber cable. So they will have to so urce their cables through from somebody. And therefore, they were allowed to use manufacturers authorization to place their bids. And this is not new it's happened in the past as well. But the numbers of non-OFC manufacturers have been more this time around.

And by when do you expect the volumes of OFC to pick up for this BharatNet?

I think the orders have recently been released. While the bid mechanics concluded sometime last November, the actual orders have been -- have gone out to the eventual winners sometime in March or April. So the procurement process is on -- they have 3 years to build and 10 years afterwards to service. So there is -- it is the procurement process has just started for most people.

Understood. Sir, my third question would be regarding pricing actions. Could you quantify what are the price increases that you've taken in Q4? And some April to now, has there been any pricing changes in cables and wire?

Well, we had one day before yesterday. So in the last fiscal, there were 12x when prices were revised only on wires. So it's almost once a month. There have been a few cases where -- about six cases where the prices were revised downwards and another 6x when the p rices went up. That is purely a reaction to the volatility that was there during the year on commodity prices. So net impact, I think costs would have gone up about 12.5% to 13%.

In the fiscal FY '25, right?

Yes. In the fiscal.

Effective yesterday, prices have changed by 3%.

Prices between, so upwards?

Yes.

Understood. Sir, my last question is regarding EHV. A lot has been talked about the solid opportunity in EHV. Any thoughts or plans to increase our projects there?

EHV, the growth prospects are still very good. There is concentration of requirements around the plus 160kV plus range. But as you know, these are projects which are very long in every part of that business, whether it is the tendering or the decisions on the tenders are subsequently on our and execution. Currently, I think the market size is approximately anywhere between $400 million to $500 million worth likely improvement towards $1.5 billion, $2 billion is not far-fetched. I think at this moment, we are reasonably placed in terms of ability to get orders. But then the business being -- a long lead time business, it takes more than 18 months, 20 months to complete a particular project and then more time to collect the monies around the project. So that's the nature of this particular business.

So currently, as of FY '25, how much of your revenue is coming from EHV?

That is in the JV. It's not in our books.

Next question is from the line of Manoj Gori from Equirus Securities.

So I have one question. If I look at the FY '25 performance and when I look at the other companies reporting the numbers and the commentaries probably somewhere we feel like we have underperformed in the via space, especially in the B2C side. And you just highlighted like some of the growth in FY '25 has been driven from the project business. So what are the areas? And what were the reasons which led to this underperformance versus peers probably how should we look at things in the coming tim e. Is this -- are these issues behind us, so probably will take some time for this underperformance to arrest and probably then grow in line or better than the industry?

Okay. My first statement was after a difficult second and third qu arter. So second and third quarter was difficult for us. First quarter was across the board. I think everyone faced a problem in terms of the in terms of the lack of enthusiasm from the market after the initial reports around the election. But subsequently, as others have gotten off the mark quicker than us. That is true. But I think we've done a fairly good fourth quarter. In terms of growth in the fourth quarter, our numbers are not very different from our peers. Some of them have larger volu mes, yes, but the growth numbers are not very different. So I think -- we have -- we had lagged in the second and third quarters, but have caught up in the fourth quarter. And I think that is something that is behind us right now.

Right, sir. S ir, secondly, if you look at from the demand perspective, what we are seeing is probably from last 2, 2.5 years, we are seeing wires relatively growing slower than cables…

This is true.

We are a wire dominant company. How do you see demand environment panning out from, let's say, FY '26 or FY '27 point of view? If you can break it into two parts, FY '26 and '27, both individually. And what would be the trigger? Because obviously, real estate, we have been talking a lot that there should be some pickup, but we are not seeing any major signs of revival of demand for is as a category. How should we see this?

I think there is -- if you look at the registration and other data that is there, there is definitely inventory reduction from the -- on the unit side. Simultaneously new projects are getting announced as they near completion is when the demand for wires would pick up. As you said, we were expecting the pickup to happen over at least the second half of last year, which is not. But I think with the kind of construction activity that is going on, it wouldn't be far -fetched to say that the current fiscal from the second half, you should see a revival in demand. Hopefully, the level of volatility that was there last year, doesn't continue through this year. If there is stability, then I think things would pick up. Yes. The business -- this is what I believe at this point in time. And I think you should see growth next year for sure and probably from the second half of this year.

Sir, lastly, if I may touch up on the margins. In Q3 and Q4, we have relatively done better on margin delivery. Should we assume that probably those margin pressures, which we are witnessing the worst is behind us. From year onwards, either this should be the base case margin profile and probably we might see gradual improvement.

I would say that there should be gradual improvement. I think if you look at our numbers over the last 5, 6 years, this '24, '25 w as probably the first year when the margins have taken a dip and then come back to -- and not yet come back to where it was, but going towards that. I do believe that most of the margin pressure related issues are behind us. We have addressed them as best as we can. And I think that from now, one should see stable to renewal growth over the next period.

Next question is from the line of Kaustav Bubna from BMSPL Capital.

Okay. So on the optic fiber business, there were a few measures that we were taking. The first one was to set up a preform facility. So the facility is ready. It's been mechanically installed and completed. We are waiting for the production trials to start that is slated for sometime this month. When that is over, then that should take about 2 to 3 months before the trials are over and the plant stabilizes. So from then onwa rds, then I think we have the product in the market as well as for our own consumption. So that would be the preform. The second step was on the fiber capacity increase. Fiber capacity -- the machine is expected sometime towards the second half of this ye ar. I think somewhere around December time frame and would take another 2 to 3 months to install and commission. So when that is done, fiber capacity will go up from the current 4 million kilometers to 6 million kilometers. The last stage was for adding an other line to the cabling capacity. The building is ready. But once the fiber line is commissioned, that's when those equipments would come in. But those are fairly simple to install, it should not take too much of time . Within 6 months , that can be made ready.

And could you speak a little bit about what's happening with pricing on the fiber side and...

The last fiscal fiber prices went through one of their lowest numbers. Partly, in view of the excess capacity as well as excess stocks available in China. While India had brought in additional duty, the prices kept falling, and I have even heard of $2.5 a kilometer kind of numbers at which price it's really unrealistic to produce. But having said that, over the last 2 to 3 months, we have seen a change in the way the fiber market has been developing. Globally, the consumption and demand related activities in the U.S. have strengthened very quickly, and there is a lot of demand in North America. There is also additional demand coming in from Europe. So we are seeing prices firming up now. So it's closer to $3.5 right now as opposed to $2.5, which was prevail ing for most of the year last year.

Next question is from the line of Saket Kapoor from Kapoor & Company.

To take the discussion forward on the OF and the OFC prices. So you were alluding to the fact that the prices for OFC has mov ed up from an average of 2.5 to 3.5. This is what just -- that is for the fiber and -- that is the fiber price, okay. Then what are the fiber cable prices, OFC prices?

That would depend on the design of the cable, right? So you might ha ve 2 fibers, 4 fibers, 288 fibers so the design mix, the price change. I mean there is no standard si ngle price for all the cables.

I'm saying there is no standard single price for all the cables be cause the price of the cable will depend on the design of the cable.

If we take the utilization levels for the optic fiber cable for our company and also for the country, domestically, how have the utilization levels been for the last fiscal? And what kind of uptick we have seen in the utilization levels for the current 2 months of this fiscal?

Last year, I think was fairly low across the board because government orders had been delayed. And like I mentioned earlier, while the tendering process for the Bharat Broadband project got completed sometime in November, orders have been released only sometime in March or April -- sorry, February or March. So orders to the cable manufacturers have not -- there were not much . So the utilization levels would have been fairly low last year, around 50%, 55%. This year, I think that should change because the delivery of those 16 circles is required to be done in 3 year s. And while there is fiber capacity, cabling capacity will have to catch up because peak capacity may not be sufficient. So I think the utilization levels will improve in the current and the next fiscal for sure.

Because I'm just coming to t he point by the comment by one of the leading optic fiber cable manufacturer in the country where in the ir release, they have mentioned about utilizing reaching the optimum level of, say, 90% to 100% by the month of July on the basis of what the tendering process has been. So are we also expecting those high levels of optic fiber cab le utilization by the first or the second quarter? Or what's the outlook currently for the same, sir?

Okay. My gut feel says that it would be more later than earlier. I think July is probably -- from where I stand, it's probably a little optimistic but later for sure.

Okay. For the later half, we can expect higher utilization level.

That's for sure, yes.

And thes e are on premise of both the global demand from the data centers and also the domestic demand coming up from the BharatNet tendering. These are the 2 demand drivers, the key demand drivers.

Correct. So the BharatNet project, which has b een tendered out recently, that only completes 16 circles. So this is Phase 3. There are other states which are doing it on their own. So for example, Gujarat, Maharashtra, I think Karnataka -- not Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Andhra they are all doing it on the ir own. So that is still expected to come shortly. Those DPRs are I understand currently being made. Gujarat had come out with the tender, but the others not yet. So that demand is going to drive the requirement of cables over the next 2 to 3 years. Besid es that, of course, there will be consumption in data centers. There is also consumption happening at the last mile connectivity. So as the 5G rollout happens or as the acceptance happens, there'll be more fiber - to-home applications. So that will also consume different kind of cables.

Okay. So in just a summary, we can conclude that the worst for the optic fiber cable demand and utilization levels are behind , and going ahead, the -- what seems to be coming 2, 3 years, they are going to run at full steam depending upon how and when the projects get opened up and for the process to continue.

Yes, I think it is a positive output for sure.

Okay. Sir, just a small question on the total capacity of optic fiber cable in the country, taking into account the type of capacity addition that has happened over the last few years, what is the total capacity? And where are we in terms of our market shares domestically?

Our shares have been around 11% in this market. Total capacity, I would be guessing if I make a number, I think I'll have to look up at those numbers before I say something right now. I can come back to you later.

So now on the electrical cable part of the story, sir, how are we seeing the demand drivers for the EHV cable and also the new setup being for the renewable segment that is leading to the new distribution line being set up. How are we seeing the demand drivers from there? And what portion of our revenue is derived from the EHV segment, the extra high voltage?

So like I mentioned earlier, the EHV part of the business is being done by a joint venture. So those numbers are not included in our stand-alone results, only the profit or losses accounted in our consolidated results. But EHV as a segment seems to be growing. I earlier mentioned that current level of the market is about $500 million. And we see that it can grow up to $2 billion in the next 4 to 5 years. So that's the potential that is there. Players, there are multiple players in India also now. And some of them are now entering the field with technology that we brought in 10 years ago or what Universal brought in 15 years ago. So there is definitely a place for multiple players at this point in time. The difference between the traditional wire business as well as this is that the gestation period in this business is fairly long. Each project takes anywhere between 12 to 24 months to complete. So your sales recognition is not at one point in time, it spreads over 24 months. So that's the challenge, and that's the business. So from an existing level of $500 million to a potential of $2 billion is the market size…

Sorry, I interrupted you. You wanted to conclude?

That is on the EHV part. You had another question, which is on the renewables. So we have -- like I mentioned earlier, we have introduced wires and cables, which are cured by e-beam. The application primarily was to address the solar power industry. Thes e are cables with an extremely long life. So if you expect, for example, a panel to last 25, 30 years, you would also expect the cables to last the same number of years. Otherwise, we'll have to keep changing the cables every so often. Once they're cured by E -beam, that results in a very long life for these cables. We have launched them in February, and we have recently got our certifications through BIS also. And we expect this industry to grow. I think currently, the volume of these cables that are sold are anywhere between 20,000 to 25,000 kilometers per month, and that can only increase given the fact that our government's target to improve the power generation from solar and wind generation is climbing and the targets for the future years are even higher than what they are today. So we do see a large potential in this space. Additionally, the E-beam facility, we have also launched a premium provider product. So this will go into building into construction, where we expect the life of the wire to be a minimum of 25 years. So that would also add to overall volumes, plus it would add to the premiumization of the product.

And sir, in this space, are these the E -beam cross -link solar PVs cables? Or what are the product portfolio...

These are cross-linked Polyethylene.

Come again, sir?

These are XLPE cured by E-beam.

Okay. So these are different electron beam and the one you mentioned at 2 different types.

No, no. The curing is done by an electron beam. So the cable is finished with XLPE, but it is -- after it is finished, it is cured the bar through an E-beam process.

Okay. So we have the entire setup to...

We have the setup. We have got 2 accelerators, one at NAV and the other one at 1.5 NAV. So we can pure multiple sizes of products through the machine.

And are we also in the submersible cable and the coaxial cables, sir?

We are in submers ible cables. We are in what we call 3 core flats. Those are basically some moment for submersible applications, so water and so on. And you talked about coaxial, yes, we have lines both in Goa as well as in our OFC factory. We are long -term suppliers to Ta ta Play to Sun TV to Airtel to most of the DTH operators.

So we can conclude that for at least for the segmented reporting for OFC part also, we are going to see improved margins going ahead with the utilization levels improving, and also the prices also for OF improving from -- by $1, as you mentioned. So in all, there are both the price as well as the demand pool that we are going to witness going ahead?

Yes, we should see those.

Okay. And sir, for the EHV cable, what is our just concluding, sir -- for the EHV cable, what is our market share and we're the dominant player, you did mention the name?

Okay. So like I said, again, the EHV part of the business, we do through a JV. We do not do i t directly in this entity. There, the dominant player in India so far has been Universal Cables. Currently, Universal is there. We are there. KEIs there. Polycab is there. Havells is there. But so far, only Universal and us, we have the vertical process t he others use horizontal process. All of them are acquiring equipment to put in vertical processes. It takes time. It takes about 2 years before it can get implemented. But things are moving.

And as in the hardness cable segment, are we also a player there or will participate?

We supply virus to the harness manufacturers. We supply our wires to…

What portion of our sales are -- do we derive from this segment? What kind of the market share we have? Or what is the size TAM, the target market?

The size -- currently, our s ize in this market is about INR400 crores, INR 500 crores. Most of the harness manufacturers are our customers. The overall market size will be much larger, but the dominant player here is Motherson.

Next question is from the line of [Swayam Ranawat 39:05] from Pinpoint Ex Capital.

Yes, sir. So my question is related to optical fiber. Like you mentioned that demand is picking up from domestically also and internationally and prices are more over bottomed out. So like, sir, what could be the capacity utilization for our company in preform and fiber capacity going forward? Like if you can give any ballpark percentage going forward?

So it will depend on how many projects get announced. So the comment that I made earlier was with reference to what is happening on the BharatNet project. And therefore, I do see that going forward, the requirement of cables would firm up, which means that downstream requirements also would follow similarly. You want the utilization to be as high as it can be. We had -- while when the project was being announced, we said if we operate at 70%, then the payback is in about 4.5 years or so. So right now, the preform factory is while it is mechanically completed, production is yet to start. The trials are going to start this month. So it will be another 3 months before the product is available. And the initial usage will be lower because as people get used to the production formalities, the processes. And only then they'll be able to ramp it up. So first year who is not going to be very high. But from the second year onwards, I expect at least a ramp-up to initially 60%, 70%.

Got it, sir. And sir, given that our capacity utilization will increase in future. So can we see some margin improvement over there? And if yes, then...

That is the reason why we went into this business because it is in a way a backward integration. It reduc es your dependency on someone else. It reduces imports. So today, when you buy the product, you want to buy it for a certain period of time, say, your inventory levels are much higher, whereas you make it on your own, then your inventory levels can be managed with lower numbers as well. So those are all savings that you will get -- so we definitely expect this project to result in attrition to the margins.

Got it, sir. And sir, if I'm correct, then our capacity would be finalized by this FY itself?

When you say finalized, what do you mean?

Either commercialize like it will be used for selling products?

So our intent when we set up this factory was the output of this factory would be used to make fiber on our own. Currently, we are importing the entire set of reforms from overseas. So once this factory goes live, then that import would stop and our initial requirement -- I mean our requirement would be met by internal production. That is h ow you get the margin accretion. And if there is excess capacity available, of course, we could sell the preforms out in the market as well.

And sir, you mentioned that 60%, 70% fiber utilization would be by next year?

No brief on my side.

Okay. Okay, sir. And sir, are we looking for export side also?

So far, we have been looking, but we have contracts with our suppliers who are also in that business overseas. So there are certain terri tories where we have mutually agreed that we will not compete in. And therefore, we have not been active there. But if I'm making the product myself, then those agreements are no longer relevant, and we could.

As there are no further questions, I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Viswanathan for closing comments.

So thanks, everyone, for participating in the conference. I hope I've been able to respond to your queries adequately. Thank you.

Thank you very much. On behalf of Finolex Cables Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.