Thank you very much. The first question is from the line of Neha from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Sir, my first question is on the India domestic formulation business. What is the seasonality in…

You're not audible. Can you please speak up?

Okay. Let me try speaking louder. So for the India formulation business, just wanted to get a sense on how the sea sonality was in this quarter. Because it seems like obviously chronic, we have done very well. But is it fair to assume that this growth could have been better if we had a normal season? How was it versus your expectation?

Hi Neha, good evening, Rajeev here. You're right. I mean, this time, Deepawali came a bit earlier than last year. This is one. Plus one more thing, basically once in every 5 years at mankind, we go for a deeper commercial excellence. And what's the meaning of that? In every 5 years, we find a bit of inefficiencies - things are not happening as per our system, and productivity problems are there. We start working on tha t side, and we don't shy away from working to make our foundation strongest.

So just to add on the season side, I think we saw a fairly decent season both in terms of chronic and acute season. So nothing much to call out. It's a regular season for us.

Okay. Understood. And just on the other expenses, we seem to have seen -- seasonally, if I look back, this quarter, we do see a step-up in other expenses, even if I adjust R&D. But this quarter there seems -- I know there is a one -off in the first quarter. But even adjusted for that, other expenses seems to have come down meaningfully quarter -on-quarter. So I just wanted to understand is there savings seen there? Because I thought we were -- we should increase the promotion spend, etc. So operating leverage being better than we had expected.

So you are right in your assessment, Neha. Other expenses in this quarter, they have been pretty controlled. Last quarter, there were 2 effects. One was, there was an impact of certain one-off acquisition-related costs, not to BSV but some others. And second was the impact , apart from one-off, we introduced 4 new divisions. So a bit of an investment went into that direction as well. In Q1, there was a bulge in the expenses, which has normalized in Q2.

Understood. And sorry, one last question on BSV. Now that we'll start integrating the asset, what are the milestones that we should look at in terms of margin improvement? I mean when can we start looking at probably improvement in MR productivity, probably the in -sourcing that we talked about, scope for price increases. What is the scope for margin if you think about a 1-year perspective or 2 years down the line based on your comfort of giving any margin guidance there?

So Neha, as per last commentary, there are various synergy levers in the business. But first, we have just closed the transaction. We just started integrating it. Our focus is to improve the growth of the mandate brands, both in India as well as international because we see that there's a lot of juice left. And if these products continue to see that kind of growth, the operating leverage will flow in, because gross margins also are good for these kind of products. So apart from the base business growth in this, there will be a couple of synergies. One is in terms of MR productivity, as you rightly said, the Rx business, the TTK portfolio. The MR productivity, as highlighted earlier, is much lower than the company average of BSV, so that's under 3 lakhs currently. We have some plans there, that can improve significantly in the immediate to near term to medium term. And secondly, there are manufacturing - CMO kind of opportunities plus a host of other things that would pan out in the next 12 to 24 months.

Prakash, what would be the gross margin for the BSV asset?

So gross margin-wise, I think on the consol front is in the region of Mankind, a little lower than company average, but it would -- if the mandate brands increase, I mean, the mandate brands are upwards of 70% plus.

Okay. But on a blended basis, it's slightly lower than Mankind?

Currently its slightly lower, yes.

So it is comparable to Mankind, a shade better than Mankind...

The next question is from the line of Amlan Das from Nomura India. Please go ahead.

Sir, my question is regarding the regulatory restrictions that you have written for the acute products. Could you please elaborate on that a bit?

So there are 2 products in 2 therapies. So first one is Codistar, which we've been highlighting for the last 4 quarters. So there is some impact there in this quarter as well. Going into Q3 and Q4, the impact will come down. In this quarter, particularly, there is one product in the gyn aec segment, which is Unwanted-72, which has also been impacted. So adjusted for that, I think the IQVIA number (mankind secondary sales) would have been 10% plus, which is currently 8.6%. So from an outperformance perspective, we would have still been 1.25x versus the IPM.

Okay. Sir, one more question on the Dydrogesterone project, what is the update there? How is the progress in the last quarter?

Okay, sure, sir. And one more question, if I m ay. In the exports, on one -off opportunities that was there in the last quarter. Is it continued? Or is it purely based on new launches and the base business, the growth.

So one-off opportunities where? Sorry, your question is not clear.

Sir, my question is that the export growth. Is it purely based on the base business growth and the new launches? Or has the one-off opportunity been continuing in that way that were mentioned in the last 2, 3 quarters?

So export business has seen good growth, both in the U.S. as well as ROW markets. The one- off opportunity, that is, again, as highlighted earlier, is smaller versus the base business.

The growth Guidance is expected to be int act, that is double -digit growth over the last year number.

The next question is from the line of Harith from Avendus Spark.

On BSV, now that we've closed the transaction, can you share some more details around the purchase price allocation, the breakup between intangible goodwill and the net assets acquired?

We have just started this exercise. So nothing more to add to what we have highlighted earlier , and this exercise is going to take some time. So on a very broad basis, what we can say is that whatever is the premium, anywhere between 27% to 33% would be allocated towards the goodwill portion.

Okay. Got it. And if you can also talk a bit about the performance that you've seen at BSV in the first half of FY '25, both in terms of growth and margins? And how we should think about BSV numbers for FY '25? If you could share some outlook, that would be helpful.

So we can share only top-level data points. From a top line perspective, the formulation business, which was 90% plus fiscal '24 sales has grown at about 13%, the German API business, which contributed 9% in FY24 has actually declined by 50%. So net -net, we have grown in the formulation business, which has led to EBITDA margin expansion, which was 23% reported last year to now 26%.

Okay. And is there some outlook that you can share for the second half or for the full year?

So I think, the closing has just happened and the guidance remains that business is expected to continue to see 15% plus growth with the improvement in EBITDA margins.

Okay. And lastly, on the Consumer Healthcare business, we've seen a 20% Y -o-Y growth, a strong performance. So how should we think about the sustainable growth for this business?

Yes. So Harith, on OTC business, although Q1 was a little impacted. So here, you may expect high single digit to low double digit for this financial year. And going forward, you may expect double-digit growth. And EBITDA margin will largely be in the range of 18% to 20%, as we have guided before.

The next question is from the line of Gagan Thareja from ASK Investment Managers.

First one is a clarification on BSV. If I go by the presentation figures that you gave last quarter, I think OPM stat ed there was 28% adjusted OPM. You talked of OPM's first half being 26% versus 23% reported last year. So I mean, like-for-like adjusted, what's BSV's operating margin for the first half of this year versus last year?

Yes. The adjusted EBITDA margin is 29%.

Versus first half last year would have been?

So it is in the region of 28%.

Okay. All right. Second one is on incremental interest and depreciation cost post the consolidation of BSV starting next quarter, if possible to enumerate and give some idea on that?

That's what we highlighted that the current purchase price allocation study is on the way. And we expect to close this excercise by end of this year. So by that time, you will get a fair idea as to what is the intangibles, which are getting amortized and how much is getting allocated to the goodwill. The premium what we expect on a very, very hig h level, is close to around 30% towards the goodwill.

Sorry, 30% would be towards Intangibles?

The balance should be towards the intangible s, but this has to be validated by the valuers. Currently, we have just started this exercise after closing.

Amortization would be done over what time frame?

You have to be a bit patient because this exercise is going to take time, because there are multiple intangibles and each intangible will have a particular time frame. So we will give you more color to this in our next investor call. By that time, we can talk about this with more certainty and clarity.

Okay. And basis the repayment tenures of the NCDs and the commercial paper, what would be the overall cumulative debt repayment annually you would be targeting in '25, '26 and '27?

As we highlighted that to maintain the financial prudence by FY '26, the overall debt should be less than 2x of the EBITDA level. Overall time frame, what we have kept is 3 years , within which we intend to liquidate the whole debt of INR10,000 crores. And the plan to accelerate the repayment is, one is through QIP – a part of the debt is going to be retired through that. And we have certain non -core assets for which we have initiated the process of liquidating those assets. So those proceeds will also be used to retire debt.

And what could be the equity -- possible equity dilution you would do to partly pay the debt?

So that will be close to INR3,000 crores, as per financial prudence, what we have worked out. This is subject to the formal approval and consideration by the Board. So that is the proposal which will be put across to the Board for their consideration and evaluation.

Okay. And final one from my side. Sir, the chronic acute mix will keep on mo ving in favor of chronic for Mankind's base business. Obviously, it comes, as you've already pointed out at 10% or more higher gross margins, which means that logically speaking, operating margin should have more headroom to improve unless you intend to c law it back in promotional spends. Likewise, there are operating levers in BSV. Is it fair to assume that both base business of Mankind as well as BSV will have an improving operating margin trajectory going ahead?

That's a fair assumption.

Is it possible for you to give some corridor or enumerate very broadly on ballpark what sort of improvement should we be looking at on an annual basis?

So the broad guidance what we have given going back to the guidance of 25% to 26% is for Mankind. And what we have been maintaining stance is that the BSV acquisition will be margin accretive. So the BSV margins should be better or comes out to be better than the Mankind margin. Also, you have to appreciate there are levers available, which can enhance the margin. But to quantify them at this stage, will be a bit premature. So we would like to maintain the same guidance of 25% to 26% for Mankind.

The next question is from the line of Bansi from JPMorgan.

So my question is on BSV. How should we think about growth in international markets for this portfolio? So I understand you've guided for 15% growth. And in the domestic market, you guys have a pole position with your distribution reach. But when we think about international markets, what I understand is that Philippines, Malaysia, these are the key markets for BSV as of today. So how should we think about growth in those markets? And would you need further investments to grow that part of the business?

Bansi, this is Prakash. So the question asked was for the second half of this year, where we talked about 15% plus growth. From a FY'26 perspective, when we see the full year, we expect the growth to further inch up to 15% to 20%. We are already seeing 20% plus growth in the international markets. So that should continue the momentum because these existing products will enter a lot many markets as the registrations are just taking place. So there's enough growth levers available to grow in the ASEAN markets, LatAm markets, MENA markets, so 20%-plus growth is what you could build from FY'26 onwards in the international markets.

So the first one will be more penetration in the existing market because the products they are present at is 1 to 2 player market. These are branded generic market s. So that is existing penetration in the existing markets and then the growth will propel further with entering into newer markets. So it's a two-pronged growth lever.

Bansi, I mean, we have just taken over this company and more we think ab out BSV more we feel very, very confident that this is a wonderful acquisition we have made. And it's always good to be a bit conservative initially so that we can make you happy later on. And as Prakash said that a lot of things will happen in BSV, TTK business will come, which is not a core BSV kind of a business, will be separated out - I mean, the right things will happen. At the same time, once we will come, some kind of acceleration in everything will happen. We're very confident about this.

Appreciate your comments, sir. And just on this, sir, there are a few products also in the R&D pipeline of BSV. So what should we think about time lines in terms of those products getting eventually launched? So would it be slightly longer term in 3 to 5 years' time frame?

In the case of R&D, it's always very premature to make any comments because it's kind of a journey without destination. But yes, when you look at th is at first hand, it tells us that a lot of optimism is there. That's all I can say. We don't know. I mean, it can happen in 3 years, it can happen in 5 years, we don't know. But we're quite optimistic about this.

Okay. And just lastly, on the margin bit. Prakash, how would the margin differ between domestic and international piece for BSV?

So the gross margins of international are a tad higher. Domestic margins are inching up with the mandate brands going up. Two, one of the questions asked, I think, Neha asked that question. So when I gave the number a tad lower than company average or around that was for last year. So the first half of this year, the gross margins have increased, as I mentioned, the mandate brands have seen higher growth versus the tail brands. So that i s the reason why gross margins and both EBITDA margins are higher than fiscal '24.

Okay. And because these are regulated in terms of pricing, is your pricing lower here in domestic market?

So some of the products are, because still a large portion, I think about 40% plus portfolio is still covered by DPCO. But since it is a single player market, they are able to take price hikes. So there's lot of price lever, but more so, it is more on the volume side. Still, we believe that the penetration level is still very low , g iven the BSV footprint. With Mankind coming in, the footprint increases pan-India. And there, we expect much more volume growth. Price would be a second lever to that.

The next question is from the line of Kunal from Axis Capital.

So there is a lot of headroom to grow in recent launches, such as - ophthalmology is one area, dermatology is another region where we have a lot of opportunity to grow. Then we have super specialty businesses like urology and neurology, where we feel that we have a lot of headroom to grow.

Just to add, the Mumbai division, which is the specialty chronic where there are super specialty divisions of cardio, diabeto, they are still under 3 lakhs, because they've been just launched 3, 4 years back. So there's a lot of headroom. So Mankind, if you see is a relatively younger company with 10-plus new division coming in the last 3 to 4 years, with about 3 lakh PCPM. The company average is more than 6.5. And the older divisions are INR9 lakhs to INR10 lakhs to INR12 lakhs plus and the newer division, which have launched last 3 to 4 years are around INR3 lakh plus/minus. So all these divisions have a lot of headroom to reach the company average, which in turn will improve the company average to much higher than the current levels.

So if you look at any new division of Mankind, most of the divisions are in the chronic side. And when Prakash said INR3 lakhs plus/minus productivity, the growth is 25% plus. And just multiply this in the next 2, 3 years' time, and you'll see that the productivity will go up many fold. We hope that these chronic divisions, special divisio ns will start giving us more productivity. I mean in every term, whether it's the profitability, whether it's top line, whether it's the bottom line, we'll catch up on many things.

Sure, that's helpful. But could you share what would be the productivity of the chronic division?

Your voice was not clear. Can you repeat your question?

I was asking, can you share what the productivity would be of the chronic division?

That's w hat we highlighted that only the specia lty division, which is chronic focused, the productivity is less than company average. But the legacy division, there is a mix of chronic as well as acute. So if you specifically ask that what is the chron ic productivity as a company as a whole level so that we are not able to capture and provide.

So Kunal, as you might have appreciated that Mankind is a very unique company, when they launched, the division itself had both acut e and chronic, which was a multi -specialty division. So that's why we are unable to carve out exact PCPM for acute and chronic. But what we are telling you is that the newer divisions which are specialty driven more focused towards MD s, DMs, KOLs, those are the newer divisions launched in the last 3, 4 years, which are around 3 lakh. But if you see the brands like Telmikind, Amlokind, these are more than INR400 crores, INR500 crores brand today and the PCPM sitting in the multi -specialty division would be in the region of INR8 lakhs to INR10 lakhs. So it's very difficult to carve out just for chronic.

But to add to Prakash point, around 5 years ago, our chronic contribution was ~28%. Now from 28%, it has gone up to 36%, 37%. So there's a jump in chronic from 28% to 36% in the last 4, 5 years.

Got it, sir. And just if I can carry on, on that point. When you add BSV to your portfolio, I mean, how should we see the sales force shaping up in the next 2 to 3 years? Would you be adding people because there is some overlap in terms of the prescribers? Do we see some sales force maybe, would there be layoff or anything of that kind?

Please understand. I mean, when you look at this, Mankind is a very unique company. We have different kind of functioning in Mankind. On one side, when you look at this, our traditional old mass divisions, where we have 1,700, 1,800 medical reps working from Delhi division, where we sell acute and chronic both. This is one side, the older one. Then we come to our consumer division, the second side. The third side basically is our specialty business, which we started 4 years back in 2019, 4 - 5 years back. When we say specialty, that means for all the chronic divisions, only chronic we sell over there. And now BSV. BSV is a totally different ball game. It is super specialty business, more towards critical side, more towards gynec side, more towards IVF side. So we'll hardly find any overlap. The only place in B SV where we are supposed to really work on is the TTK portfolio, where work has to be done on have 3-4 divisions. We are supposed to see how we basically play with that. Because these divisions will come to Delhi side as these are branded prescription products. So there, some kind of optimization will take place. We see 5 - 10% overlapping that's all, nothing more.

Just one point, if I may add. So BSV PCPM on an average last year was 6.5 . But if you carve out just the TTK, which was under 3, the remaining PCPM is upwards of INR8 lakhs.

The next question is from the line of Gagan Thareja: from ASK Investments.

Is it possible to give some idea of the contribution to your domestic sales from your in-licensed brands currently and how they have grown year-on-year?

So there is a significant growth across th e in -licensed brands. We are not calling out the percentage, but it is a very tiny percentage today. But we have seen very strong growth across older products, which were in-licensed like Neptaz, and also the recently launched products like Inclisiran as well as the Symbicort.

Okay. But is it reasonable to assume that this growth number would be much higher than the cumulative reported growth of the domestic piece?

So Gagan, please try to understand that whenever we go for any in-licensed product, the strategy is not only growth. The strategy is how to really make our presence in topmost doctor's chambers. So they become the spearhead of our marketing side, these in-licensed products help our marketing team in entering big doctor chambers. So that way we see in-licensed products. If you're selling branded generic product or some specialty products , but once you start selling these in-licensed products (a lot of science is there ), a lot of information is passed on to these doctors and they start listening to us. At the same time, it really enhances the rep utation of Mankind. So it's more of intangible, it's more of helping ou r marketing side rather than just looking at how much volume growth, how much growth is there. We don't feel like that. It's so tiny right now.

Okay, sir. And on the Panacea brands, I think last year, you grew very well. Have you been able to maintain that kind of growth momentum in the Panacea brands?

Same kind of growth. Yes, it's 25% plus.

Right. And exports last year, you had indicated that on that base, you will grow moderately this year, but first half growth has been very strong in exports. I think the base catches up in 4Q, but that would still mean that if you can continue at your current sort of quarterly run rate exports this year should also be very healthy in growth. Is that assessmen t correct? And secondly, on that base in FY'26, how should we look at exports for Mankind excluding BSV?

So Gagan, as you know, exports guidance is very difficult. But if you see, the U.S. generic cycle is pretty favourable and better than expected. And contribution of ROW sales have also picked up. So both of them contributing significantly to the overall growth. So we still be guiding for double digit. Let's see how we end. For FY'26, we'll come back to you in the Q4 quarter.

Yes. I mean 1H is very strong. So arithmetically, even if you maintain that sort of rate, we're still talking about a very good number in exports for this year. But be that as it may. Last question from my side. When you indicated noncore assets will be used to pay back a certain amount of debt , one - what will be potentially the scale of repayment that you can sort of get from monetizing these assets? And if possible, can you perhaps point out which are these? Are you talking about the resort and the real estate asset?

So these are the two hospitality units, one is the name of Mahananda, separate entity and one is broadway which are in the process of being liquidated.

Right. And what part of your debt can be repaid away from liquidating these assets broadly?

We have currently floated the RFP for sale of these assets. So what we are targeting that somewhere around INR600 crores to INR650 crores should be the consideration what we are looking at, which will be used for the purpose of retiring the debt.

The next question is from the line of Tushar from Motila l Oswal Financial Services. Please go ahead.

On the chronic therapy side, if you could share the price volume and new launches growth?

It's a very small base, and we are just catching up. We are still under index ed to the market. As Sheetal ji highlighted, market is at 38%, we are at 36%. So there's a lot of volume jump that is happening. At the same time, wherever there are price difference, we have taken the price hikes also. And as you know, we had increased our covered market presence from 62% 3 years, 4 years back to now 69%, 70%. Within that period, we have launched a lot of chronic portfolio, which is still catching up. F or example, within respiratory, we launched inhalation; within diabetes, we launched insulins. In cardiac, as you know, we launched these lipid lowering drugs as well as Neptaz. So there's a lot of addition that has happened in the last 3 years. They 're all catching up. So there's a lot of volume jump that is happening.

So if I exclude the BSV portfolio for tim e be ing and look at the prescription growth rate, considering these kind of products that are getting added in the chronic side. So wha t kind of growth prospects can be thought of for the pure domestic, let's say, prescription side of the business for next 2 to 3 years?

I mean 2 places, now 3 places, we are very bullish, these are very close to our heart. One is our consumer business. Second is our chronic side. Just try to see Mankind's position. I mean, a few years back, it was just 1%, 22 years back, our chronic share in our total share was only 1%. And today, it is 36%. How we have done it? We have just been continuously working on it. Our first priority basically is in the short-term period, how can we cross 40%, kind of a contribution from our chronic side. And in long term, why not more than 50% like our peers are doing it. That's the kind of aspiration we keep in our heart in chronic side because we know, one, it brings consistency. Second, it brings more profit, whatever new prescription you add that clearly gives you growth as well. So all in all, it's a fantastic thing. We learned this a bit late, but we're working on it. And that's one reason you always see that in chronic side, our growth is more than IPM always.

That's quite encouraging. So just connecting that to the profitability like in your earlier calls, you had highlighted Panacea, is now like 33% sort of an EBITDA margin out of profitability. So in a pecking order, putting it like chronic, acute, then consumer and then the ex ports and now Panacea, in terms of the EBITDA margins of these segments, if you could throw some light on this, Which are the ones which are more than the company average and which are the ones which are below company average?

So Panacea has been a successful acquisition where the EBITDA margin is much higher than the company's average, because that's a pure chronic play. And plus, at the time of acquisition, we were relying on Panacea to supply once they internalized, the margins improved further. So as we have earlier also called out, the margins are upward of 30% for the Panacea business. We don't do the profitability at the chronic segment or at the acute segment , we do a consolidated segmentation. And now we have started showing a separate business segment of consumer care. So if you look at the peckin g order broadly, Panacea is number one , t hen the core or the main business is number two . Then comes our OTC business, where we have given our guidance that the EBITDA margins will be in high teens. So that's how the pecking order is.

And exports, sir? Export will be below OTC?

Yes. So exports also lies somewhere between the high teens and the company average margin.

The next question is from the line of Alankar from Kotak Institutional Equities.

So it's been 5 years now since we set up our specialty team. While you did comment on the current PCPMs and the scope for improvement in the future, can you qualitatively comment on how has been the progress so far versus, say, our initial expectations, what have been the key learnings? And any specific therapeutic areas wherein you expect the performance could have been better and possibly there is more scope for improvement in the future?

5 years back, the specialty business es we launched and immediately after that the COVID happened. Don't forget that. It was only after a few months, COVID happened. So all in all, if I say almost 2 years were lost in COVID, so it's 3 years old journey. And when this kind of interval is there or interruption is there, certain things which you expect don't happen. People developed different kind of habits, post-COVID. So you keep on facing those challenges. In some of the divisions, the productivity has reached to 4.5 lakh and INR5 lakh. But in some of the divisions, I'd say, were not up to the expectations, productivity didn't reach to the right level. Our neuro business needs a lot of improvement. Again, we are working on the leadership side. Our one division in the diabetes side, we need a bit of improvement. But rest as a whole, things are quite good. I can tell you - 70%, 70% plus divisions are doing good. Some are doing very, very good. Some are doing very good and 30% are not in the category of our expectations. And there are always new challenges. Because it was the first kind of experience. We came to new therapies. So we learn and just keep working. We are living in a very dynamic world. Things change very, very fast, and we are also learning from it.

Understood, sir. That's helpful. The second one is it possible to share our performance in either this quarter as well as or maybe the first half, Mankind versus IPM in rural markets and Tier 1 towns?

So if we talk about Tier 2 to Tier 6 towns, our growth has been higher than the IPM growth in Q2. It has been 7.2% versus 6.9% of IPM. And if we take H1 as a whole, then it is 1.1x of IPM.

And for the Tier 1 towns, sir?

Understood sir. And one final question. So now that the confusion around the sale and distribution of emergency contraceptive pills has been resolved, do you expect sales for Unwanted-72 to recover completely in the current quarter, third quarter?

No. The issue of emergency contraceptive pill was that it was brought under price control. So I don't think that there was an issue that needed to be resolved. So there was price erosion and that is why the total numbers look so low.

The volume remains intact.

Volume is intact.

Understood. So basically, I mean, compared to our run rate before the second quarter, it will be -I mean, we'll have to work with a slightly lower pricing going forward as well?

Yes. Pricing has been revised downwards, yes, just for that.

The last question is from the line of Harith from Avendus Spark.

So on your initiative to launch products using DMF quality APIs, you mentioned that we've launched around 200 SKUs till date. So would you be able to share some color on the response to this initiative. Have we seen some kind of a positive impact on growth in these SKUs and do we have a goal in terms of number of SKUs that we'll cover in the near to medium term?

Yes, could you repeat the question again, please?

The initiative to launch products using international DMF quality APIs. You mentioned that we have launched almost 200 SKUs using these DMF quality APIs. So what I was asking was about the response to this initiative from doctors. How have they reacted to this? And do we have any goal in terms of number of SKUs.

Reaction is very, very positive. When we say that there is a growth in the chronic side more than the IPM, better than any other companies, it really means that it's not by just creating some kind of a specialized division. That specialized division is supposed to have some kind of a, I mean, a differentiated product. And when we sell DMF -grade API products, that's a differentiated product. So I mean, if you are a doctor, and if I say that whatever quality the Americans get, somebody living in Europe gets , if you get the same quality, right, at Indian prices. So that's quite impressive, actually. In 30 seconds, the call is done impact fully. Same Rosuvastatin, same other simple molecules, Telmisartan or sildenafil. But once you had DMF in that, it gives so much of credibility. It really opens the access to most sophisticated more super specialty doctors as well.

Okay. Last one. On the volume growth tha t you've shared for the quarter, 1.3% and this was closer to 2% in 1Q. So while we have outperformed the IPM in terms of volume growth, but historically, we have seen Mankind growing at 4% to 5%, maybe except FY '24. So where do you think this volume growth will settle at? I understand last few quarters, you had the impact of some regulatory restrictions. But if I think over the next 2 to 3 years, how should we think about volume?

I mean, everything is always in comparison. If IPM i s growing at a certain percentage, our growth is always relative to that. We wish to grow more and will definitely grow more in the future. That's -- I think we can say that. And I also mentioned you that time and again, we keep doing certain commercial ex cellence exercises. So whatever you're seeing right now is a bit muted despite of having more growth than IPM growth, I say it's still muted, we hope to catch up soon. We hope to have more volume growth as well in the future.

Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question for today's conference call. I would now like to hand the conference over to the management for their closing comments.

Thank you, everyone. For any further queries or clarifications, please feel free to write to us on investor.relations@mankindpharma.com. Thank you, and have a nice day.

Thank you so much.

On behalf of Mankind Pharma Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines. This transcript has some minor edits to enhance the understanding and readability and does not purport to be a verbatim record of the proceedings. Since it is a transcription, it may contain transcription errors. The Company takes no responsibility of such errors, although an effort has been made to ensure a high level of accuracy