Transformers And Rectifiers (India) Limited analyst Q&A

Yes. So when I was seeing the results, I can see that the cost of materials consumed has increased a bit disproportionate to the revenue. And I'm guessing that this is because of the copper price surge due to the Hormuz disruption. Could you throw some more light on what other raw materials is disrupted due to this Hormuz closure?

Avikshit, see, mainly copper is slightly disturbed. Other than that, not because of Hormuz issue, but because of overbooking for all other like ancillary parts like bushings and stuff, there is a slight disturbance plus the porcelain is made in gas -fired kiln, gas is also becoming slightly problem. So there is -- there are certain issues that we are facing because of Hormuz, but not very much.

Okay. Sure. And one more thing is that we are foraying into HVDC. And I wanted to understand the competitive landscape in HVDC from you. I've seen that a lot of MNC players are already in the thing. What is the competitive advantage that we have?

So there are only 4 major players in HVDC ; Hitachi, Siemens, GE and I think TBEA. But as TBEA is not able to compete with us in other tenders, only 3 major competitors are there. Other than that, we are the only players who are -- who will be entering into HVDC.

I'm sorry, but I couldn't quite decipher what the competitive advantage was.

HVDC is a very highly technical product. And because of the limited number of players in this HVDC side, the margins are also better in HVDC.

Okay. Sure. I was also reading Siemens' con -call that only about like 1 to 2 tenders are floated every year for HVDC. So what are our odds on getting that contracts compared to these 4 players that you just mentioned?

So yes, currently, there are only about 1 to 2 tenders of HVDC. But going further, the number of tenders that are going to be in pipeline should be around 10 to 12. Each tender should have about 3 units of HVDC. So there is a good scope in HVDC in the futu re -- coming future. And by that time, we will also be successfully empanelled in HVDC transformers.

Our next question comes from the line of Vaibhav Mishra from Finvestors.

Sir, my question is regarding this West Asia conflict. I mean, how can this affect or is it affecting us in any way like supply chain or from the delivery side? Are we affected in any way from this?

No. Basically, see, if you look at our export number, etc., there is very minimal exports that what we are currently doing. And from the West Asia region, there is a very minimal import that has been coming to India for us. So there is no major impact as far as this conflict is concerned. So the only issue that we are looking at is availability of gas for which -- for our fabrication units and stuff like that. But we are mitigating those issues also.

All right, sir. And sir, regarding the guidance, actually in the last 3 quarters, I think this is the second quarter where we have missed our g uidance like the revenue guidance of, I think, INR 2,600 crores in Q3 call, it was told. And also order book, it was very confidently said that the closing order book will be INR 8,000 crores but it's still INR 5,000 crores. So what is leading to this recently? TRIL, I mean has the history of not missing its guidance. So what is happening, for the last 2, 3 quarters?

So see we are deliberately not taking orders currently because , as we have previously told that we want to limit our exposure to not more than 18 to 24 months. And we want to be very selective in which orders we take in terms of delivery and in terms of the price that we quote. So we are being extremely selective of what orders to take. And we do not want to take any order which is beyond 24 months of delivery. So that is where we stand at right now. As long as we do not -- we are not free for next 24 months, we don't want to take any further orders -- because we want to be extremely selective for this.

Alright. But sir, this stand was in the last call itself, and that we were select ive and we were targeting the ratings?

We are maintaining our stand that we do not want to take any orders that are beyond 24 months.

All right, sir. And sir our backward integration plans that we have for the next time in Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, four quarters, are they on track? I mean is there any change in time lines of them?

No. That is all -- is on track. We already started the site preparation, plant & machinery, which is having a higher lead time has already been ordered. So by the starting of next financial year, we will start the impact of this backward integration plans that we have.

All right, sir. One last question, regarding FY27. So the revenue target that we have in mind for FY27 or the -- I mean consolidated margins that we are targeting for?

So I think as of now, we have not say, finalized what we will be looking at -- but what we can - - what we can say is around INR3,250 crores is what we are looking at currently.

Our next question comes from the line of Balasubramanian from Arihant Capital Markets.

Sir I'm trying to understand the gross margin side. In FY26, we have a gross margin of 31%, 32% kind of range. We are trying to reach 35% by FY28 and 40% with deeper integration. So I'm trying to understand like how this gross margin improved in terms of RIP bushing internalization, CTC internalization, CRGO s ourcing efficiency and price increases. Which central item comes the most weightage if you could share some clarity on that?

Yes. Currently, you are right, we are at 30%, 31% margin. And due to this capacity expansion that what we are doing at our Changodar and Moraiya project, plus the efforts that has been done to do the operational efficiencies, etc.. This will give us some margins in terms of next, say, 2 to 3 years, plus the backward integration plans, which will start from the next financial year, which will also give us some, say 200 bps to 300 bps of additional margin. So that's how we are looking at around, say, 35% margins.

I think a s a lready mentioned we are on track for backward integration s. So I'm trying to understand, I think we have a 60% increase in capacity of MVA and how the industry issues not remain resolved in terms of supply constraint. So whether we have all the sourcing agreements or MOU already in place for the incremental CRGO, bushing and CTC volumes?

Yes, we already have agreements in place.

Okay, sir. Okay. Sir my last question, if you could help us understand on furnace transformers, renewables and green hydrogen. On that furnace transformer side, we have seen market size only INR 200 crores to INR300 crores despite having high technical barriers and low competition. Why the addressable market is so small and whether we can expect substantial growth in those areas? And secondly, renewable side, the margins are at a lower level, for renewable transformers and solar transformers typically lower margins, whether we can be able to see the margin improvement or volu me improvement in those areas. On the green hydrogen side, I think we have not started any projects or any supplies. I'm trying to understand whether -- when we can expect demand for green hydrogen side, especially like any specific policy or project milestone or any tender awards or any state pipeline approvals are in place?

So as far as transformers or renewable energies is concerned, see with our backward integration and with 75,000 MVA manufacturing capacity, our purchasing power becomes significantly high. So the margin improvement there are going to be very high. I completely understand that right now, there is not much margin improvement there. There is not much margin improvement there. But with the backward integration and with purchasing power of 75,000 MVA, there should be a substantial decrease in our purchasing price. So this is going to affect our margins effectively. Green hydrogen, the projects are still not coming up live. We are also working at a few prototype transformers, which need to be short circuit tested and done some testing. So as soon as the projects come up live, we will start getting some feedback on the green hydrogen transformers.

On the furnace transformers side?

Furnace transformer we will see some improvement as the steel industry in India starts moving at a faster pace.

Okay, sir. Thank you.

Moderator, can we limit to one question per person, please, otherwise everybody won't get a chance.

Sure. Our next question comes from the line of Deepak Poddar from Sapphire Capital.

Yes. So extended monsoons was one of the biggest reasons in terms of delay in the usefulness of the plant.

Okay. Understood. And when is the Moraiya plant expected to come on stream?

Moraiya plant, we are planning after this year's monsoon.

So by 3Q FY27?

Yes.

Okay. So ideally, then your first half growth would be quite muted, right? Because already?

No. See, Moraiya, we still have -- we have -- Moraiya plant is working at about 75% plant utilization. So we are working on maximizing that plant utilization before we start anything else.

Okay. Understood. And what's the capex involving?

I'm sorry to interrupt you, sir, but please re-join the queue for more questions.

Is a follow-up, yes.

You may re-join. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ashish from Leo Capital.

So I have a question regarding how the industry works. So how fungible is installed MVA capacities across voltage classes? Can capacity allocated to, let's say, 220 kV be redeplo yed to higher kV or vice versa or are they largely dedicated voltage specific lines?

So see, basica lly, the capacity -- there are three things that wou ld -- from 400 kV, we can go down to 220 kV. From 220 kV, we will not be able to go up to 400 kV if the plant is not designed for 400. So let's say, testing facility, crane capacity, windin g machines capacity, there are four, five items because of which fr om 220 kV going up to 400 kV is going to be a challenge, but coming down from 400 kV to 220 kV is easy. So it's not vice versa, but from 400 kV to 220 kV, it can be done from 220 kV to 400 kV, as long as plant is not designed for 400 kV, it will not happen.

Okay. So to summarize, let's say, someone has a distribution transformer capacity in MVA that can't be scaled to a EHV 220 kV to 400 kV capacity?

No.

And what are the limitations exactly?

Crane capacity, le t's say, the building -- the height of the building, testing facilities, there are many factors, winding machine capabilities. There are many factors that will affect it.

Yes. So sir, my question is on the industry side, like due to the extended monsoon, RoW and approval delays in the overall industry, transmission in the equities industry. So are we seeing any slowdown in the capex or is it temporary or like one or two quarter execution spill over?

No. There won't be any delay as far as capex plan is concerned.

Okay. And we are not facing any delay in dispatching any order for the current order book and all?

No.

Our next question comes from the line of Vineet from Toro Wealth Managers.

Sir, my question is around the supply enhancement that has been going around in the entire power value chain, right? Like most of our vendors as well in the transformer value chain are enhancing the capacities. So I just wanted to know if -- like what's our view on like if we can negotiate with our suppliers when they have the increased capacity?

Sorry, Vivek, we didn't understand your question.

Sir, I mean, I'm asking this phase where the capacities are being enhanced by most of our vendors, what is our position in negotiating on prices with our suppliers?

See, Vineet, honestly, there is still hand to mouth in terms of most of the items that transformer manufacturing is concerned. So we can only negotiate in terms of delivery time for each product that we need. That is one of the basic negotiations that can happen currently.

So demand is so strong that only we can negotiate on the delivery time lines and all that is more or less the same?

Yes.

Our next question comes from the line of Yash Gupta, Ashit Kotecha Family Office.

My first question is on the capacity. Could you please help us understanding the trajectory of our upcoming capacity addition? Is it reasonable to expect that around 50% of the utilization will come by H2 FY27? And how should we think about capacity expansion plan over the next 2 to 3 years and how cash flow will be utilized from it?

Yes. See, basically, from Changodar facility will be up and running from this, say, quarter 2. And after that, we will take up this Moraiya plant expansion. So after these 2 plants, the capacity would be, say, from 40,000, it will go up to 75,000.

And how our utilization will be for second half of FY '27 and '28?

It would be roughly...

Yes, upcoming capacity Changodar will start from the H2. But initially, it would be low since it is a new plant, et cetera. But from the, say, next financial year, it would be running at around 75%, 80% capacity.

So I think by end of quarter 3, we should be almost at 80% capacity in Changodar plant.

But do you think it will impact our EBITDA margin in the first half and maybe Q3?

No. Because see, our orders are already in the pipeline and we are working on that. So that won't be any impact. It would be, in fact, definite ly, the quarter 3 numbers would be on a higher side because of the new capacities. But this say first half, that numbers would not be impacted by this.

And Yash, like we said before, we are very selective in what orders we want to take righ t now. We are not taking any orders that are beyond 24 months. So being selective on the number -- the type of orders that we are taking because there is not going to be any effect on the EBITDA of the company.

So sir, higher in Q3 means in terms of higher margin or the amount you are talking about?

Both -- not margin, but in terms of revenues.

So margin will be this only 16.5% to 17%?

Yes, margins will remain at 16.5% to 17%.

Okay, sure. Thank you, sir.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Yash Rathi from Mangal Keshav Service. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon and c ongratulations on good set of numbers. I wanted to -- so we are going backward integration on the CTC plant itself. So just wanted to understand, would that also require additional PGCR approval if we are using that for the captive purposes into our 465 and moving forward, when we get HVDC approval as well, we would be using our CTC for the captive purposes. So how the PGCIL approval would look like?

So PGCIL approval will definitely be needed and the plant that we are putting up for CTC and the plant that we will be putting up for pressboard, both these plants are world -class plants. So we have already taken into account what all PGCIL requires for approval of the plant. And since it is our own captive consumption, the approval becomes very easy in terms of from PGCIL.

Can we just get some timeline on the same? And also how much...

Timeline on getting approval from PGCIL?

I think within the month of starting the production capacity, we should get the approval. See, as it is PGCIL and we are also facing some issues regarding the deliveries of CTC conductor. So it is of utmost importance for PGC IL also to make sure that they have one more vendor in India, which delivers CTC production.

Okay. And just one more thing on the CTC front itself. So it won't cater to our whole production for the transformers. So how much we would still look to outsource or it would be enough to -- for our annual transformer manufacturing capabilities?

So the current plan is to cater to 100% need of T&R. And going forward, with certain more expansion, we will be also looking at selling in the market, third -party selling also we will be doing. So we will basically be also CTC suppliers to other transformer manufacturers.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Shubham Dhamsna from Thinksight Advisory. Please go ahead.

Sir, any update on the World Bank issue?

We have given our -- Mehul Shah will give you a reply.

Yes. So as per the time lines, etc., we have filed the reply to the World Bank, and we are awaiting the -- any response also. And recently also, we have filed that before taking any decision, etc ., we should be given an opportunity to be heard in person. So we are awaiting the feedback from the World Bank on this.

Okay. So when can we expect a reply?

I think it should be closed in 45 days. That's what our belief is.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Abhijeet Singh from Systematix. Please go ahead.

Thank you for the opportunity. Sir, my question is on HVDC. What is the scope of our offering in the HVDC scope overall? For example, the OEM typically has about 45% to 60% of the overall project cost. So you mentioned that you will be able to supply 3 to 4 units in a substation for HVDC. So what is the scope and percentage of the overall project cost for HVDC for us?

We didn't understand your question. Please, can you come back again?

Yes, sir. I mean out of the total project cost for an HVDC, what is our scope? What is our scope? So let's say, we are supplying HVDC transformer, right, 3 to 4 units per project. So what is that as a percentage of overall capex of the project?

Right, sir.

Because HVDC transfor mer is going to be the largest equipment and the most expensive equipment in the project. So around 40% should be our cost.

Right, sir. And sir, when do we expect the approval from PGCIL for this particular product?

So once we've successfully repaired this transformer and given back to PGCIL, after 6 months of working in satisfactory condition, PGCIL will start the process of approving us as one of the HVDC manufacturers in the country.

Right, sir. Sir, just one last thing.

I'm sorry, but please rejoin the queue for more questions. Our next question comes from the line of Prathmesh Salunkhe from PL Capital. Please go ahead.

Hi, sir. Thank you so much for the opportunity. Sir, my question is again on the HVDC space. I just wanted to understand now that we are -- now that we plan to supply only the equipment, the HVDC transformers in the projects, and it may take some time for the approvals to come in. And at the same time, I recall in the last few calls, management had mentioned that we are not really doing LCC or VSC. We are trying to come up with our own technology. So for next 2, 3 years, all the projects that are in the pipeline have already been established, whether as an LCC or VSC project. So how will TARIL be able to compete for these projects against the established MNCs?

What is LCC project?

Sir, technology of the HVDC, LCC and VSC?

So we are coming up with our own process of HVDC.

Yes. So sir, my question was the same since major -- there are 2, 3 projects in the pipeline, right, for next 2 to 3 years. So all those 2 or 3 projects have already been decided whether they are coming with LCC technology or VSC technology. So if the projects are coming in LCC and VSC and we are not supplying either of these technologies, how will TARIL will be able to participate in these tenders. So basically, we will have to wait for a project in -- for next 4, 5 years before we can participate. Is that the right understanding?

No, that is not the right. And there are other projects that are coming up with EPC contractors also where we will be participating.

Okay. So these projects will -- the EPC contractors, these projects will not primarily come from a player like PGCIL. Is that right?

All right, all right. Thank you. Thank you so much.

Thank you. Our next question com es from the line of Raj Sarraf from Finvestors. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity. Sir, I'm tracking and I'm invested in the company since last 2.5 years. I appreciate the journey that TARIL has been through. But sir, from last 1-year, what I'm seeing that there is a delay in some projects. If I compare the investor presentation of FY25 and now FY26, on the Chairman's comment. So what I can see that the capex -- all capex have been delayed by at least 1-year? And all the backward and all the integrations are also delayed with the same timeline and then the guidance also delayed. And when I watch interview, which is given by your Director of Finance, Mr. Chanchal Rajora, so that he guides on television and what we come through the conference call, there is a very significant difference in these two outcomes. So I want your take on that?

So what are you exactly referring to, if I may ask? Are you talking about the order input?

Sir, there are numerous things, sir, like order inflow. What you are mentioning that we are very concerned about the margins and the quality of the orders we are taking. Despite questioning on the same line to the Director of Finance, he then confidently on TV interviews, putting the number of 8,000 and close to 7,500 order book closer by FY26, the first thing. The second thing, the projects or capexs we are right now executing, the timeline of the project, which is right now delayed by at least 1-year, all the projects, vis-a-vis Changodar, or Moraiya? And the third thing is on the margin front, okay. What we are expecting as an investor from last 1-year that all the projects which are right now being done will increase the margin, whereas what we are going thr ough even in the last Q4, the recent concluded Q4, despite that we are having a greater number on the topline, the margin is still consistent, which we would have liked that it could have come the best margin of the year. So all these reasons, sir?

So as long as the outlook on the margin, we have always maintained that the margins will remain at 15% to 16%. We have never changed that. In terms of the order book, yes, we have miscalculated the orders that were supposed to be coming to us. And like we say, we are very careful in selecting which orders we really want to execute because right now, the market is such where we can be slightly choosy about what orders to take. As far as the new projects are concerned, there is a -- there was a delay because of extended monsoons, which has delayed the project by one quarter.

Okay, sir. And sir, on the guidance side also, sir, initially, when...

Sir, I'm talking about the guidance on the top line, sir, not on the order book, sir, which you have clarified now?

Top line, Mehul sir will give you an answer. Yes.

The top line, which was guided in the commencement of FY26 was 3,500, which was reduced midyear after very subdued Q2. That was again told 2,500 to 2,600. And even on the 3rd and 4th March, when Director of Finance came on television, and he reiterated the guidance that we are very sure that we will be closing about 2,500. So this INR 100 crores guidance is okay. But the confidence which has been shown initially in the year and right now, the tone of the management in this Q4 conference call is not matching?

Yes, that's true that initially we have targeted that number, but that has been later on revised, and we have categorically come up and revised that guidance during the quarter 2 conference call.

My point is that, sir, we are doing very phenomenally well. Let us be -- it's not to you, sir, be conservative and deliver more rather than being more...

We have realized -- Raj, we have realized this. And that is why this year, we have given an outlook of INR 3,250 crores, not beyond that.

Yes, sir, I will share this and thank you very much, sir. I'm concerned about the company because I'm invested for the last 2.5 years. Thank you very much.

Sure. Sure, Raj.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Karan Gupta from ACMIIL. Please go ahead.

Yes, so my question is more on the margin side. Considering the competitive bidding in the industry, what will be the margin on EBITDA level consol basis over 2 to 3 years? So this -- one thing is the competitive bidding in the industry. And the second thing is that you are doing the backward integration, and you're seeing 2% to 3% kind of lever in the margin you can get. So my point is in the next 2 to 3 years, what will be the margin side? It will be compensated by the backward integration you are doing or it will improve further from the mark of 16%, 17%?

Yes. See, as we are saying that the margins will remain in the range of, say, 15% to 17% as currently. And through this backward integration coming up, you may see some increase in that number.

About 200 bps to 300 bps, yes.

Yes. See, compared to our financial year '25 numbers, definitely the receivable number and inventory numbers are high. On the receivable side, I think due to this last minute, say, March numbers, we have missed certain collections. So in the in the first, say, first 15 to 16 days' time, we almost collected around INR 200-odd crores. So there are some delays as far as the utilities is concerned because their budgets, etcetera, has gone away by March. So they have released the payments in the new financial year.

So basically, payment has got delayed?

Yes.

Our next question comes from the line of Deekshant from DB Wealth.

You mentioned that we are looking at alternative sources for our gas, which will help us continue our production. What is it that we are doing to mitigate this risk right now so that our production can ramp up?

So we had invested a few years back in some laser cutting technology. We have also invested in plasma cutting technology. So all that is coming online, and this gas crisis has helped us improve our efficiency on those cutting CNC machines.

So instead of using gas as a power source, we will be using electricity as a power source?

Yes, that is correct.

Sir, is there an y other way that we can make sure that we don't hit into any problems for expanding our capacity because now that we are going to a new phase of expansion, this seems to be a risk that seems to be very likely?

What is the risk that we are talking about? The gas risk, are you talking about?

I mean anything that is going to make our production capacity go down or our capability to deliver go down. Gas is one of it, right?

No, no, no. There is no issue as such for the utilization of the capacities.

Okay, sir.

We don't see any risk in the utilization of the capacities, Deekshant.

Okay, sir. Thank you so much.

Our next question comes from the line of Aditya Vora from Sohum AMC.

So I had a question on margins. You alluded to the fact that I think 15%, 16% is a good number to look at currently. Structurally, I just wanted to understand that most of our peers, in spite of being in low kV class are doing superior ma rgins to us and also that t hey are not backward integrated? So what is the reason for our margins to be at 15%, 16%, where majority of the peers are 18%, 19% and even 20% to some extent. So that was the understanding which I wanted. And also at a time when the transformer industry is at an explosive growth, shouldn't we be getting better margins and faster growth?

Yes. See, this backward integration margins is yet to come into the picture. So this -- we are talking this margins, say, 15%, 17% i s without any margin improvement in terms of backward integration. But...

No, no, I understand what you are trying to say, but the peers also don't have backward integration. That is one. And secondly, what I'm trying to highlight is that peers are in relatively lower margin, lower kV class, while you are predominantly into 220 kV and above. So 220 kV and 400 kV is what you are targeting, while if I look at majority of our peers, they are getting to 220 kV or 400 kV? In fact, if you look at say Atlanta, it recently got into 400 kV Voltamp and others are getting there. So ideally, our margin structurally should be much higher than them. And I'm assuming even their backward integration, leaving aside, say Atlanta, their backward integration is the same as us. So I don't know why our margins are at only 15% structurally?

Yes, sir, that's the reason why we have stopped. We are very selective in terms of taking orders, etcetera, going forward. So as you must have seen these orders, we must be executing, which we have taken, say, 12 months, 15 months back. And that is the ma jor reason why we have decided that, yes, we will not take any orders which is coming our way. And we will be very selective in terms of margins, etcetera, as well as the delivery schedules, etcetera, are matching with our production lines. So that is the reason why we would be selective and our margins will improve.

Okay, sure. And just one thing on your guidance going forward. Would you l ike to give any guidance for FY'27 in terms of growth percentage, if not the absolute number?

It would be roughly around, say, 35%, 40% growth in terms of revenue.

Okay. And order book, any sense on that, considering you're curtailing incremental order inflow to focus on the quality of orders?

I think if we do INR3,250 crores, we will be, let's say, I don't know...

Other than putting these numbers, we would be like to restrict ourselves to -- we will take the order, say, up to 24 months.

Okay. And 35% to 40% is the revenue growth what you're talking for FY'27?

Yes.

Sir, my question is on the inquiries under negotiation PowerPoint presentation. That is INR23,000 crores that you have mentioned. Now you highlighted you are looking at orders only under 24 months. So of this INR23,000 crores, how much is under 24 months?

After quarter 1, there should be around INR 18,000 crores MVA order inquiry that will be in 24 months.

And sir, you confirmed that the receivables that have gone up by around INR 410 crores of – INR 200 crores of this INR410 crores have come in the first 15 days of April.

Yes, yes.

That has happened, right?

Yes.

Thank you. Thank you so much, sir. And that is it from me.

Yes. Moderator, we would like to take last few questions, please.

Our next question comes from the line of Neville S. Shroff an Individual Investor.

Sir, my question would be on the order book mix. So recently, we've seen a good amount of orders coming from the state utilities -- from the government utilities. So could you tell us that out of the outstanding order b ook of INR5,000 crores, how much percentage consists of these utility players and how much is the private portion?

So let's say, around 55% will be utilities, 20% will be EPC contractors and remaining all private customers.

Okay, sir. Got it. And another sir, now with backward integration facilities in place, which will be coming into effect from the first half of FY'27 and by -- and latest by FY'28. So that would lead to shorter lead times and also give us some cost advantag es. So would we be approaching more private players who still prefer Chinese suppliers for transformers or we'll stick to this mix?

No, we would be approaching many private customers. But provided we are getting deliveries and order inflow is going to be -- quality of the order inflow is going to be the key area of focus in the next year.

So we'll be taking the last question from Shashi Ranjan from Anandan Capital.

I heard that we have order book of around INR 5,000 crores approx. So in previous discussion, we also learned that we were not able to pass on to the rising cost because the order that was there was older one. So we couldn't revise upon the increased tariff. So how many such order book that we have, which are not giving us more margin out of that INR5,000 crores order book?

I think everything that has been there, we have already executed. So now we are -- since last 6 months, we have been very critically analyzing every order that we want to take and we are very selective in taking orders. So none of the orders that are in this INR5,500 crores have any issues in terms of our margins or costs.

And last one, sir, if you may allow, what is the current capacity that we are running at? And how far we intend to pull this capacity utilization in the next 2 quarters?

So we are currently running at around 75% capacity, which should go -- this year, we should go at around 95% capacity.

Ladies and gentlemen, due to time constraint, that was the last question. Any pending questions may be sent to the Transformers and Rectifiers (India) Limited Investor Relations team, and they will get back to you. With that, I'll hand the conference over to the management for the closing remarks. Thank you, and over to you, team.

Thank you once again for joining us today. I extend my heartfelt gratitude to all our stakeholders, customers, employees and Board members and investors and all of you who have attended thi s Investors call. Thank you very much, everybody.

Thank you so much, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, on behalf of N uvama Wealth Management Limited that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us and you may now disconnect your lines.