Thank you very much, sir. First question is from the line of Gaurav from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you for taking my question. Congratulations on stellar results. My first question is on your improved growth outlook compared to the previous quarter. Obviously, this is supported by a very strong performance in Q1, but there is also assumption that you are building in from Q2 to Q4. So just trying to understand the confidence behind those assumptions, especially the metrics around insourcing, outsourcing that you alluded to in your comments also, which allows you to kind of improve the outlook from overall revenue perspective?

So, thank you, Gaurav, for the question. I'll take this one. See, Shadowfax is an organization where we typically work with enterprise customers. For enterprise customers, we typically get a fair degree of visibility, especially when we get into the sales season , around the kind of volumes one should expect, because necessary capacity have to be created in advance I think this is tru e with the large marketplaces where they also have some sort of in -house delivery ecosystems. Today we can proudly say that we have a fair degree of visibility and high degree of confidence on the numbers that we are projecting, and hence we are revising our estimates from a growth standpoint. Typically, all of our large enterprise customers give us forward projections so that those capacities can be created in due time. Now for the customers who do not have alternate ecosystems for delivery, who 100% depend on 3PL, it's largely a function of the investments and the growth outlook that we see from our existing tail of growth and the new customers that we are going to acquire. What we see is that our rapid investments and hiring of sales teams, investing into D2C brands, and the tailwinds that we are carrying for the last few quarters, the new customer growth looks to be quite aggressive and positive. And just to cut the answer to a short one, I think we are fairly confident on the numbers that we are looking at.

Got it. My second question is on the front-loading of the investments and capex. You gave a number of INR60 crores, which is pretty strong, like a high number for a quarter. Just trying to understand how much of this is because you have seen the upgrades to your current growth, because my assumption is all these current growth numbers are already backed up by the investments that you made last year. So, this upfronting of the investments, probably, has to do beyond FY27 outlook that you have in mind, which is why you were kind of upfronting some of these investments across the board, not just in terms of square feet of space, but also the dark store s that you talked about, the pin code coverage that you talked about, the large parcel pin code reach that you talked about.

Looks like you have upfronted the investments here. So obviously, that has to do with the confidence beyond just FY27. So, I'm just trying to reconcile the outlook with the investment s that you have made?

So, yes, Gaurav, I'll try to answer this question in multiple parts. But you are absolutely correct. I think our view on long-term growth outlook continues to stay quite aggressive and strong, and with every quarter that passes by, I think the confidence on the growth outlook is only going up right now. Now talking about investments, there are two kinds of investments that we have to do as an organization. One is around capex, and the other one is around opex, which largely comprises about people, trucks, and rentals. Speaking first about capex, you are absolutely right. A lot of our investments typically have to be front -loaded before the sales season, because in the sales season you typically see a huge peak, and the peak stabilizes post that. While last year was something interesting where post the peak also, we saw sequential growth, but typically we plan for capex for the peak season, and hence in the first two quarters of any financial year, you tend to see a higher capex outlay getting executed on the ground. Now within that, if you see the slide in our presentation, , we have not changed the nature of the capex. We are investing in the same set of products that we were doing in the previous year. 77% of the capex that we are talking about has gone into network and automation. To make it simple, network and automation typically means everything which is part of our sortation centers. So be it the sorting machines, be it the infrastructure, be it IT and any sort of electrical expenses from an infrastructure side. 77% of these expenses continue to be focused on the middle -mile capacity enhancements that we are doing. And you are right, these are , very long -term investments. Typically, these facilities, once you create, last for 5 plus years as well. So, we continue to make these kinds of investments. Secondly, again, you're right, we are expanding our pin codes. We are expanding our coverage into the deeper rural areas of the country, and that has an opex impact. But yes, all of these are continuous investments we are doing as we are seeing growth projections from our customers.

Got it. My last question is on some margin bridge, if possible, to give, because there are multiple elements that played out during the quarter, which is fuel price hikes, the labor cost escalations, some operating leverage that has come through your business, and there could be other factors as well. So, a broad bridge would be very helpful. Thank you.

Yes. Gaurav, I'll take that. So, see, essentially, as we said, because of the fuel hike, for the last few days in the quarter, we took that additional cost. So, as you see, our transportation cost has gone up from last quarter 18.7% to 18.8%. That's one cost increase that has happened. Partner expense from last quarter has again slightly increased because, there was a supply squeeze. Our hyper-local also grew at a faster pace, sequentially. So that's another area. If you see, the consumable cost also has gone up by 0.1 %, as some of the inputs are linked to crude

prices and hence some prices actually took off by middle of the quarter, so that's responsible for the 0.1% increase. And all other expenses put together saw 0.1% increase. But significant benefits have come from, say, lost shipment, where we did a huge amount of work in this quarter. So that's come down from 6.1% to 5.5%. In fact, what you see is not so straightforward because, had we not worked on improving our efficiencies, our costs, for example, transportation cost may have been higher than what it is today, our partner expenses could have been higher than what it is today, and even our employee benefit expenses could have been higher than what it is today. So, we saw that there is a higher cost incidence, and we said, "Okay, let's work harder to keep it within our limits." I don't know if that helps like a bridge, but that should give you a flavor.

No, this is helpful, Praveen. Just a follow-up. Is the full impact of the cost already reflected in the financials in Q1, or they're likely to come over the next two quarters? Thank you.

Yes, more or less it's reflected in quarter one. The costs may be higher, but we'll also have a little upside from the revenue coming in to neutralize that.

Thank you. Next question is from the line of Mukesh Saraf from Avendus Spark. Please go ahead.

Yes, good evening, and thank you for the opportunity. My first question is on the Express segment itself. Our network currently is largely set up for the large horizontal platforms, but obviously, your focus now is on the D2C as well as the Prime Large. So just trying to understand, how much of the existing network can kind of accommodate growth in these two sub -segments, or the majority of the growth here will have to come through, say, newer infrastructure and newer network that you're going to set up?

Thank you, Mukesh, for the question. I'll take this up. So, while we are setting up Prime and Prime Large sort of service lines, one thing we want to tell everyone over here is that there is no dedicated infrastructure for any particular service line or a particular line of customers. How we have solved this as a supply chain company is that for different lines of services, within the same infrastructure, within the same last -mile hub, sortation centers, or trucks, we have created prioritization based on what the customer needs. Not all customers are on the same SLA, as you would understand. So different customers have different SLAs. We call this segmented supply chain. So within the same supply chain, and within the same sort center, multiple SLA configurations run, and that orchestration is done by the in-house technology that we have created. We ensure that the brand which needs a same-day delivery can go within the same roof, versus, let's say, a low -value shipment, which again has to be shipped in a different configuration altogether. But as I said, there is no dedicated infrastructure that we have set up for any particular service line.

If you end up setting dedicated infrastructure, it has huge implications on operating leverage, and at the costing which our customers expect, the business could become completely unviable. We'll move to the next question from the line of Sachin Salgaonkar from BofA. Please go ahead.

Hi. Congrats management on great set of numbers. I have three questions. Let me go through them one by one. First question would be great if you guys could dissect the 38% growth you mentioned. Is this primarily getting driven by Express? Is it QC? Is it hyper -local? Any rough guide in terms of how the individual businesses could grow?

So, I think it's a combination of both the businesses. We are seeing upside in hyper-local as well as e-commerce. E-commerce, given the tailwinds with which we are coming, and with the new customers that we have acquired over the last two, three quarters, we believe that growth is going to sustain, and hence there is a readjustment on the target numbers. Similar sort of a view is applicable even for quick commerce, where we have seen upsides with newer customers like Amazon Now, where we believe that some of the benefits that we have seen now, we had not anticipated those two quarters back. And given the kind of business we are doing and the visibility we have with these customers, we have basically built those into our predictions now.

Got it. Pretty clear, Abhishek. Second question is more a follow -up on the comments on new customer growth you mentioned. Would love to understand how there is a mix change happening in your Express business between an e-commerce D2C vertical, let's say, as compared to a year back? And I did look at your market share in Express for this quarter versus last quarter. You did mention about a 28% to 30% market share versus a 27% to 29% last quarter. So, the question out here is, is this gain more at the expense of smaller players or a larger player?

Well, I think I'll answer the market share question first. What we are seeing in the market today is that the consolidation continues to strengthen between the two large players, and every quarter, the two large companies in the Express Parcel segment are continuing to gain market share, and that's something we have been observing as a trend over the last, probably, four to six quarters now. So, I think that's a trend that we've been seeing. Around your other question , again, D2C brands were a relatively smaller business for us 4 quarters back. 8 quarters back, it was virtually non-existent. 4 quarters back, it became a smaller number. Today, that has grown to almost 2.7 times. So, you can imagine that the D2C brands and the associated smaller businesses are growing significantly faster than the rest of the business.

Got it. Super clear. And third question is on the quick commerce side. And while we understand, let's say, how an e -commerce entity thinks about insourcing and outsourcing, because one of them is public, would love to actually understand from you a framework which you guys could help analysts and investors understand how these quick commerce platforms are thinking between insourcing and outsourcing.

There was a comment in your presentation where you talked about e -commerce platforms focusing more on outsourcing, but how do the incumbent quick commerce and food delivery guys think? Is there a rough proportion of their orders which they outsource, and is there something where they especially go to specialists like you for delivery?

Yes. Now, that's a very good question. I'll tell you about a larger point around outsourcing or having multiple supply chains in any given line of business, and what I'm going to say stands true for any sort of online business today, be it e-commerce, food delivery, or quick commerce. In this country, it is impossible for any supply chain to come up and say that we are the best supply chain every single minute of the day, every single pin code, every single route of this country. Our country is extremely complex. So having just a single supply chain to depend all your fortunes on is never a great idea. To manage for the end customer and to optimize your experience for the last customer, every supply chain tends to diversify and have multiple solutions. Same goes for quick commerce. While in quick commerce industry, we are the single largest 3PL operating today, where now we have a meaningful market share, and we believe our market share will be more than 50% today in the quick commerce outsourcing segment. Typically, all companies think about having us as an alternate supply partner, rather than a capability-driven supply chain. Because not every day their own in -house supply chains will always offer them the best SLAs. Now if for a marginal price increase, you are having access to a supply chain which meaningfully improves your customer experience, and you do not lose that customer in an extremely competitive environment to your competitor, it makes sense to outsource. What we are seeing is that customers can outsource even 20%-25% of the volumes if there are enough players available. Given we are the single largest player of the national scale right now, we have seen the outsourcing levels in the industry to be trending anywhere between 12% to 15% today. I hope it answers your question.

Abhishek, super clear. One quick follow-up for Praveen, more a bookkeeping question. Praveen, what is the impact of the minimum wage hike in the four states on your margins?

Yes, we have roughly taken about between INR2 crores to INR2.5 crores a month impact because of minimum wage impact coming from various states.

See, one thing also to understand about our business is that we necessarily don't always pay minimum wages to our contractual employees. A lot of people actually get incentives and markups on top of that, because hiring at minimum wage level is not the easiest at times. So typically, when the minimum wage correction happens, the delta, does not always transfer to your P&L.

Yes, thank you, and all the best.

Thank you. Next question is from the line of Dhruv Jain from Ambit Capital. Please go ahead.

Hi, team. Thanks for the opportunity, and congratulations on phenomenal numbers in such a challenging quarter. So, in this quarter, we've seen significant margin expansion . You also spelled out the guidance of about 38% to 40% top-line growth. Incrementally, does that also change your full -year guidance for your margin, because you've been talking about 100 to 200 basis points, and in a very challenging quarter, you've shown almost 100 basis points margin expansion. So how should we be thinking about this for the year ahead?

Yes, that's an interesting point. And see, we are not fundamentally changing our margin profile in the business. While we are catching up on growth faster, we still want to maintain the margin guidance that we had given at the start of this year. The way we think about our business is that we know this is a steady-state margin we want to hit at a certain time frame. Whatever excess profits we generate, we typically do one of the two things. Either we pass on some benefits back to our customers so that we can gain market share faster, or we invest that capital into newer capabilities, again, to grow faster. So, we have put a certain target of margin profile out for all shareholders. Beyond that, we just want to reinvest and accelerate as an organization.

Fair, Abhishek. The second question that I had was on your other logistics services. So, you spoke about integration happening in this quarter, but beyond FY27, how should we look at that segment from a 3-year or a 5-year perspective, from a growth standpoint? What are you trying to do, I mean, I know what you're trying to solve there, but just in terms of the opportunity, how should we think about it, because it's slightly different versus the first two things or the core businesses, so to speak?

Yes. So CriticaLog is an acquisition we did almost 1.5 years back, and there's been a lot of integrations completed between both the organizations as of today. See, the way we think about that business is, it's a value -added services capability for us, and not necessarily too different than the core supply chain that we run, but again, it's a different category of solutioning that we have created. Now for our strategy, the way we think about it is that anything and everything which helps us gain more mindshare of our existing customers is great for us. Creating more unique services like a critical logistics for our large or small marketplaces is something which is the core strategy around doing that acquisition. So, the way we typically follow is, once you acquire an organization, we give it some time for both the cultures to seep in. And only post that, we basically start cross selling the services between our customers. I can give you one example. There is an active conversation, which can potentially increase the revenue of CriticaLog as an organization by mid -teen percentage points, where one of our

existing customers has the problem of delivering extremely high value shipments, for which they were not using Shadowfax. However, they are willing to use CriticaLog because they have trust in our integration and our capabilities, and they are willing to consider our subsidiary to integrate with them and start that business. Now, the way we are looking at it is that this cycle will continue for the next 12 months, and post that is when we will see critical logistics to actually grow much faster than the Shadowfax core business, once branding, marketing, and th e cross-selling has happened. One thing that I also want everybody to understand is that, when you are selling critical logistics or a value-added service as a category, the sales cycles are phenomenally longer. If you're selling a low-value service, the sales cycles are typically shorter, but when a customer has to move an expensive item from their existing setup into a newer solution, it takes a lot of time, and a lot of convincing, but again as you would understand, typically with long sales cycles, the hook for those services is also much higher. I hope I answered your question.

Yes, yes. Thanks a lot, Abhishek, and all the best.

Next question is from the line of Abhishek Banerjee from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.

Hey. Hi. Thanks for the opportunity, and, again, congratulations on another superlative performance. Just a couple of questions from my side. First, on the point that you made on delivery riders doing reverse logistics, could you please expand on that a little bit? I didn't understand that.

Yes, Abhishek. So, this is where we have a technology where when a rider is at the doorstep, doing a pickup, he has to do quality checks, right? There was already an existing system in place where - technology used to assist him in ensuring that he's doing the right pickup . Because we are charging a premium, we are supposed to do a quality check and pick up the right product for our customer. Now we have used AI to enhance what he was already doing. So, the chances of him picking a wrong shipment have significantly reduced, which is , if you remember, in our lost shipment cost, we used to always say half of that is quality check cost. So that's the feature that is there.

Got it. So how much has your lost shipment cost come down as an overall percentage?

So, it's come down from 6.1% in the last quarter to 5.5% as a percentage of revenue.

And do you see it coming down further over the next year or so?

See, as we always said, right, there is enough scope here. Historically, this cost used to be around 4.5% to 5%, and then our target was to bring it down to about 3.5% to 4% in the long run. That target still remains. We will keep chugging at it every quarter and see how much it comes down by.

Got it. Well, and one last question to Abhishek. So, see, again, full credit to the entire team for this wonderful performance, but one question that kind of keeps coming up is, you are now a

listed player, and your core anchor customer is also a listed player who can obviously see your performance, your margins. Do you foresee any scenario where they ask you for even better pricing, just looking at your kind of margins? I mean, do you feel that there could be further pricing pressure on you from your core customers? And is that something that you are prepared to handle?

Yes, Abhishek, it's a question irrespective whether we are profitable or not, which we'll need to answer as a business at all moments of time. See, our customers are optimizing their cost and experience literally on every lane that they work on. So, if we are not competitive, we will anyways not get the desired volumes that we are delivering today. Staying competitive, building lean supply chains, and ensuring that the back -end operations are extremely efficient is what delivers profitability in our business. Having said that, for all our customers, , we have pricing rate cards where their cost of working with us will go down as they increase more volumes, because we pass on that sort of leverage back to them, as there's a certain amount of fixed cost in our business. So, as they give more volumes, they essentially end up saving cost, and that is what has been happening over the last few quarters as well.

Got it. Understood. Very helpful. Thank you so much. I'll move back in the queue.

Thank you. Next question is from the line of Mukesh Saraf from Avendus Spark. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi. Good evening again, and first of all, sorry, I got disconnected the previous time. I did hear your response, though. My second question is regarding the vertical dark stores, the vertical D2C business that you're building. Just trying to understand, will there be an overlap of this with the SDD business that you're doing on the D2C. Because both seem to be largely similar in terms of what value you're bringing in, which is quick delivery for the smaller brands? So, will there be a cannibalization there as you expand your dark stores? Would you help me understand that

Yes, that's a great question. Again, too early to comment on what the future is going to be a few years down the line, but see, largely, both cater to very different needs of the same customer . Typically, when you look at same -day delivery, same-day delivery offers that service in a city for close to about 1 million SKUs for a large marketplace. But, a dark store -led delivery, which is happening in an hour, will be possible for a maximum of 10,000 SKUs. So, the SKU width is very different for a same-day delivery versus a quick commerce kind of a model. Typically, these verticalized quick commerce platforms provide a specialized solution to the end customer, and I would say they are more in competition with the horizontal players, rather than

with the e -commerce same-day delivery sort of value propositions. The SKU spread is very different, and that's what we see from our customers as well.

Okay, okay. And just follow up on that, the cities that you're going to have these services, will there be an overlap there, or even the pin codes are very different?

So, I think the cities, and the customer is going to be probably the same. See, typically, if you think about the metro cities, in every metro city you should have the 1-hour proposition, same- day proposition, 3-day proposition. The SKUs tend to differ a lot.

Got it. All right. Thanks a lot for this, Abhishek. I'll get back in the queue.

Thank you. Next question is from the line of Atul Borse from JM Financial. Please go ahead.

Hi, team. First of all, congrats on great set of numbers. My first question is around the dark store operations. So, on the last call, you had mentioned that a dark store can generate roughly INR8 lakhs to INR15 lakhs per month revenue. So, any color on how much in Q1 it has contributed to the other segment revenue?

Atul, see, I think at this point, we may not want to disclose specific store-wise revenues. It's still a larger experiment we're doing. We're live in 47 stores. Broadly, I can say about , all the stores put together would be contributing to about 10% to 12% of our other logistics services revenues. But at a store level, as you can imagine, there are different types of customers, different SKUs, and the store size can range anywhere between 200-300 square feet to almost 3,000-4,000 square feet. So, the dynamics are very different for each store, but we will come back, I think, as this vertical matures, we will come back with more information that will help you.

Okay. And so for Amazon Now, we have started fulfilling, but are we seeing the Express volume also coming from Amazon in Q1?

Hi, Atul., so yes, Amazon Express Parcel volumes have also started. We are now live across multiple cities, and that number continues to compound as we enter into the sales season. But again, today the larger focus of the partnership is to really scale up the Amazon Now business. One additional fact, Amazon has now, entered the top 10 customer club for us.

Okay, okay. And one more follow -up on this. So, our realization in Express is still trending around INR50. With Amazon coming in and the D2C share rising, when do you see that this realization will start trending upwards?

See, again, I think realization over here is a function of a lot of factors, be it the average weight, or the distance of delivery, the type of service, value -added versus not, and obviously, the volumetric weight. So, if you were to compare on the same weight sort of a basis, if the business continues to gain more D2C volumes, it should ideally be increasing the realizations, but a lot of it is dependent on some of the other factors, which are weight, distance etc. which is typically not in the control of the logistics company.

Okay, yes. Thanks. Those were my questions, and best of luck.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will take this as a last question for the day. I now hand the conference over to the management for the closing comments.

Okay. Thank you, everyone, for joining in on a Friday evening. In case any of you have any sort of questions, you can directly reach out to us, and we'll be happy to engage over the next few weeks. Thank you, everyone, for joining in. Signing off. Thank you.

Thank you, sir. On behalf of Shadowfax Technologies Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you all for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines.